 |
|
Commentary: Artificial Intelligence for Adult Spinal Deformity
Lawrence G. Lenke
Neurospine. 2019;16(4):695-696. Published online 2019 Dec 31 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14245/ns.19edi.020
|
|
Citations to this article as recorded by
 From the Spinopelvic Parameters to Global Alignment and Proportion Scores in Adult Spinal Deformity
Yongjae Cho, Dae Jean Jo, Seung-Jae Hyun, Jin Hoon Park, Na Rae Yang
Neurospine.2023; 20(2): 467. CrossRef Artificial Intelligence to Preoperatively Predict Proximal Junction Kyphosis Following Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery: Soft Tissue Imaging May Be Necessary for Accurate Models
Graham W. Johnson, Hani Chanbour, Mir Amaan Ali, Jeffrey Chen, Tyler Metcalf, Derek Doss, Iyan Younus, Soren Jonzzon, Steven G. Roth, Amir M. Abtahi, Byron F. Stephens, Scott L. Zuckerman
Spine.2023; 48(23): 1688. CrossRef Artificial intelligence for adult spinal deformity: current state and future directions
Rushikesh S. Joshi, Darryl Lau, Christopher P. Ames
The Spine Journal.2021; 21(10): 1626. CrossRef The Important Role of Paraspinal Muscle Quality for Maintaining Sagittal Balance While Walking: Commentary on “Correlation of Paraspinal Muscle Mass With Decompensation of Sagittal Adult Spinal Deformity After Setting of Fatigue Post 10-Minute Walk”
Kyung-Hyun Kim
Neurospine.2021; 18(3): 504. CrossRef Commentary on “Characteristics and Risk Factors of Rod Fracture Following Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis”
Junseok Bae
Neurospine.2021; 18(3): 455. CrossRef
|