1. Borden AG, Rechtman AM, Gershon-Cohen G. The normal cervical lordosis. Radiology 1960 74:806-9.
2. Gore DR, Sepic SB, Gardner GM. Roentgenographic findings of the cervical spine in asymptomatic people. Spine 1986 11:521-4.
3. Hardacker JW, Shuford RF, Capicotto PN, et al. Radiographic standing cervical segmental alignment in adult volunteers without neck symptoms. Spine 1997 13:1472-80.
4. Boyle JJ, Milne N, Singer KP. Influence of age on cervicothoracic spinal curvature: an ex vivo radiographic survey. Clin Biomechanics 2002 17:361-7.
5. Kuntz C, Levin LS, Ondra SL, et al. Neutral upright sagittal spinal alignment from the occiput to the pelvis in asymptomatic adults: a review and resynthesis of the literature. J Neurosurg Spine 2007 6:104-12.
6. Suda K, Abumi K, Ito M, et al. Local kyphosis reduces surgical outcomes of expansive open-door laminoplasty for cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Spine 2003 12:1258-62.
7. Uchida K, Nakajima H, Sato R, et al. Cervical spondylotic myelopathy associated with kyphosis of sagittal sigmoid alignment: outcome after anterior or posterior decompression. J Neurosurg Spine 2009 11:521-8.
8. Pickett GE, Mitsis DK, Sekhon LH, et al. Effect of a cervical disc prosthesis on segmental and cervical spine alignment. Neurosurg Focus 2004 17:E5.
9. Johnson JP, Lauryssen C, Cambron HO. Sagittal alignment and the Bryan cervical artificial disc. Neurosurg Focus 2004 17:E14.
10. Suk KS, Kim KT, Lee JH, et al. Sagittal alignment of the cervical spine after the laminoplasty. Spine 2007 32:E656-60.
12. Knott PT, Mardjetko SM, Techy F. The use of the T1 sagittal angle in predicting overall sagittal balance of the spine. Spine J 2010 10:994-8.
13. Lee SH, Kim KT, Seo EM, et al. The influence of thoracic inlet alignment on the craniocervical sagittal balance in asymptomatic adults. J Spinal Dis Tech 2012 25:E41-7.
15. Oshima Y, Takeshita K, Taniguchi Y, et al. Effect of preoperative sagittal balance on cervical laminoplasty outcomes. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2016 41:E1265-70.
16. Cho JH, Ha JK, Kim DG, et al. Does preoperative T1 slope affect radiological and functional outcomes after cervical laminoplasty? Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2014 15 39:E1575-81.
17. Fujiwara H, Oda T, Makino T, et al. Impact of cervical sagittal alignment on axial neck pain and health-related quality of life after cervical laminoplasty and in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy or ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament. A prospective comparative study. Clin Spine Surg 2018 31:E245-51.
18. Sakai K, Yoshii T, Hirai T, et al. Cervical sagittal imbalance is a predictor of kyphotic deformity after laminoplasty in cervical spondylotic myelopathy patients without preoperative kyphotic alignment. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2016 41:299-305.
19. Ferch RD, Shad A, Cadoux-Hudson TA, et al. Anterior correction of cervical kyphotic deformity: effect on myelopathy, neck pain, and sagittal alignment. J Neurosurgery Spine 2004 100:13-9.
20. Gwin DE, Iannotti CA, Benzel EC, et al. Effective lordosis: analysis of sagittal spinal canal alignment in cervical spondylotic myelopathy. J Neurosurgery Spine 2009 11:667-72.
22. Cabraja M, Abbushi A, Koeppen D, et al. Comparison between anterior and posterior decompression with instrumentation for cervical spondylotic myelopathy: sagittal alignment and clinical outcome. Neurosurg Focus 2010 28:E15.
23. Liu S, Lafage R, Smith JS, et al. Impact of dynamic alignment, motion and center of rotation on myelopathy grade and regional disability in cervical spondylotic myelopathy. J Neurosurg Spine 2015 23:690-700.
24. Yoshida G, Alzakri A, Pointillart V, et al. Global spinal alignment in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Spine 2018 43:E154-62.
25. Sasso RC, Metcalf NH, Hipp JA, et al. Sagittal alignment after Bryan cervical arthroplasty. Spine 2011 36:991-6.
26. Guerin P, Obeid I, Gille O, et al. Sagittal alignment after single cervical disc arthroplasty. J Spinal Dis Tech 2012 25:10-6.
27. Faldini C, Pagkrati S, Leonetti D, et al. Sagittal segmental alignment as predictor of adjacent-level degeneration after a Cloward procedure. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2011 469:674-81.
28. Hansen MA, Dip G, Kim HJ, et al. Does postsurgical cervical deformity affect the risk of cervical adjacent segment pathology? Spine 2012 37:S75-84.
29. Snowden R, Miller J, Saldon T, et al. Does index level sagittal alignment determine adjacent level disc height loss? J Neurosurg Spine 2019 31:579-86.
30. Park MS, Kelly MP, Lee DH, et al. Sagittal alignment as a predictor of clinical adjacent segment pathology require surgery after anterior cervical arthrodesis. The Spine J 2014 14:1228-34.
31. Hilibrand A, Tannenbaum D, Graziano G, et al. The sagittal alignment of the cervical spine in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Pediatr Orthop 1995 15:627-32.
32. Canavese F, Turcot K, De Rosa V, et al. Cervical spine sagittal alignment variations following posterior spinal fusion and instrumentation for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Eur Spine J 2011 12:1411-8.
36. Charles YP, Sfeir G, Matter-Parrat V, et al. Cervical sagittal alignment in idiopathic scoliosis treated by posterior instrumentation and in situ bending. Spine 2015 40:E419-27.
37. Shimizu T, Cerpa M, Lehman RA, et al. Reciprocal change in sagittal profiles after adolescent idiopathic scoliosis surgery with segmental pedicle screw construct. A full-body X-ray analysis. Spine 2019 44:1705-14.
38. Janusz P, Tyrakowski M, Kotwicki T, et al. Cervical sagittal alignment in Scheuermann disease. Spine 2015 23:E1226-32.
40. Berthonnaud E, Dimnet J, Roussouly P, et al. Analysis of the sagittal balance of the spine and pelvis using shape and orientation parameters. J Spinal Disord Tech 2005 18:40-7.
41. Lee SH, Son ES, Seo EM, et al. Factors determining cervical spine sagittal balance in asymptomatic adults: correlation with spinopelvic balance and thoracic inlet alignment. Spine J 2015 15:705-12.
43. Smith JS, Shaffrey CI, Lafage V, et al. Spontaneous improvement of cervical alignment after correction of global sagittal balance following pedicle subtraction osteotomy. J Neurosurg Spine 2012 17:300-7.
45. Thompson W, Cogniet A, Challali M, et al. Analysis of cervical sagittal alignment variation after lumbar pedicle subtraction osteotomy for severe imbalance: study of 59 cases. Eur Spine J 2018 27:S16-24.
46. Neuman B, Harris A, Jain A, et al. Reciprocal changes in cervical alignment after thoracolumbar arthrodesis for adult spinal deformity. Spine 2019 44:E1311-6.
47. Smith JS, Lafage V, Schwab FJ, et al. Prevalence and type of cervical deformity among 470 adults with thoracolumbar deformity. Spine 2014 39:E1001-9.
52. Lee JH, Park YK, Kim JH. Chronic neck pain in young adults: perspective on anatomic difference. The Spine J 2014 14:2628-38.
54. Iyer S, Nemai VM, Nguyen J, et al. Impact of cervical sagittal alignment parameters on neck disability. Spine 2016 41:371-7.
55. Suk KS, Kim KT, Lee SH, et al. Significance of chin brow vertical angle in correction of kyphotic deformity of ankylosing spondylitis patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2003 28:2001-5.
57. Villavicencio AT, Babuska JM, Ashton A, et al. Prospective, randomized, double-blind clinical study evaluating the correlation of clinical outcomes and cervical sagittal alignment. Neurosurg 2011 68:1309-16.
58. Protopsaltis TS, Scheer JK, Terran JS, et al. How the neck affects the back: changes in regional cervical sagittal alignment correlate to HRQOL improvement in adult thoracolumar deformity patients at 2-year follow-up. J Neurosurg Spine 2015 23:153-8.
59. Hyun SJ, Kim KJ, Jahng TA, et al. Clinical impact of T1 slope minus cervical lordosis after multilevel posterior cervical fusion surgery. Spine 2017 42:1859-64.
60. Vavruch L, Hedlund R, Javid D, et al. A prospective randomized comparison between the Cloward procedure and a carbon fiber cage in the cervical spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2002 27:1694-701.
61. Lee SH, Lee JC, Tauchi R, et al. Influence of the number of cervical fusion levels on cervical spine motion and health-related quality of life. Spine 2016 41:E474-80.
62. Bao H, Varghese J, Lafage R, et al. Principal radiographic characteristics for cervical spinal deformity. A Health-related quality of life analysis. Spine 2017 42:1375-82.
63. Lau D, DiGiorge AM, Chan AK, et al. Applicability of cervical sagittal vertical axis, cervical lordosis and T1 slope on pain and disability outcomes after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion in patients without deformity. J Neurosurg Spine 2020 23:23-30.
64. Harrison DE, Harrison DD, Cailliet R, et al. Cobb method or Harrison posterior tangent method. Which to choose for lateral cervical radiograph analysis. Spine 2000 16:2072-8.
65. Cobb JR. Outlines for the study of scoliosis. In: Edwards JW editors. Instructional course lecture. Vol 5. Ann Arbor (MI): American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons; 1948. p.261-75.
66. Polly DW Jr, Kilkelly FX, McHale KA, et al. Measurement of lumbar lordosis. Evaluation of intraobserver, interobserver, and technique variability. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1996 21:1530-6.
67. Ames CP, Smith JS, Eastlack R, et al. Reliability assessment of a novel cervical spine deformity classification system. J Neurosurg Spine 2015 23:673-83.
68. Diebo BG, Challier V, Henry JK, et al. Predicting cervical alignment required to maintain horizontal gaze based on global spinal alignment. Spine 2016 23:1795-80.
70. Protopsaltis TS, Lafage R, Vira S, et al. Novel angular measures of cervical deformity account for upper cervical compensation and sagittal alignment. Clin Spine Surg 2017 30:E959-67.
75. Protopsaltis TS, Ramchandran S, Tishelman JS, et al. The importance of C2 slope, a singular marker of cervical deformity, correlates with patient-reported outcomes. Spine 2019 45:184-92.
76. Choi CS, Lee DH, Hwang CJ, et al. Effectiveness of C2 incidence angle for evaluating global spinopelvic alignment in patients with mild degenerative spondylosis. World Neurosurg 2019 127:e826-34.
77. Kim SW, Kim TH, Bok DH, et al. Analysis of cervical spine alignment in currently asymptomatic individuals: prevalence of kyphotic posture and its relationship with other spinopelvic parameters. Spine J 2018 18:797-810.
79. Yukawa Y, Kato F, Suda K, et al. Normative data for parameters of sagittal spinal alignment in healthy subject: an analysis of gender specific differences and changes with aging in 626 asymptomatic individuals. Eur Spine J 2018 27:426-32.
80. Yoshimoto H, Ito M, Abumi K, et al. A retrospective analysis of subaxial sagittal alignment after posterior C1-C2 fusion. Spine 2004 29:175-81.
81. Mukai Y, Hosono N, Sakaura H, et al. Sagittal alignment of the subaxial cervical spine after C1-C2 transarticular screw fixation in rheumatoid arthritis. J Spinal Dis Tech 2007 20:436-41.
83. Hey HWD, Lau ET, Tan K, et al. Cervical alignment variations in different posture and predictors of normal cervical kyphosis. Spine 2017 42:1614-21.
86. Weng C, Wang J, Tuchman A, et al. Influence of T1 slope on the cervical sagittal balance in degenerative cervical spine. An analysis using kinematic MRI. Spine 2016 41:185-90.
88. Kim HJ, Lenke LG, Oshima Y, et al. Cervical lordosis actually increases with aging and progressive degeneration in spinal deformity patients. Spine Deform 2014 2:430-14.
89. Yoshida G, Yasuda T, Togawa D, et al. Cranopelvic alignment in elderly asymptomatic individuals. Spine 2014 39:1121-7.
91. Oe S, Togawa D, Nakai K, et al. The influence of age and sex on cervical spinal alignment among volunteers aged over 50. Spine 2015 40:1487-94.
92. Iyer S, Lenke LG, Nemani VM, et al. Variations in sagittal alignment parameters based on age. A prospective study of asymptomatic volunteers using full-body radiographs. Spine 2016 41:1826-36.
93. Park MS, Moon SH, Kim TH, et al. Radiographic comparison between cervical spine lateral and whole-spine lateral standing radiographs. Global Spine J 2016 6:118-23.
94. Machino M, Yukawa Y, Imagama S, et al. Age-related and degenerative changes in the osseous anatomy, alignment, and range of motion of the cervical spine. A comparative study of radiographic data from 1016 patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy and 1230 symptomatic subjects. Spine 2016 41:476-82.
95. Tang R, Ye IB, Cheung ZB, et al. Age-related changes in cervical sagittal alignment. Spine 2019 44:E1144-50.
100. Kusakabe T, Endo K, Aihara T, et al. Difference in cervical sagittal alignment between the standing and sitting positions. J Orthop Sci 2019 24:1005-9.
101. Hey HWD, Teo AQA, Tan K, et al. How the spine differs in standing and in sitting-important considerations for correction of spinal deformity. Spine J 2017 17:799-806.
102. Lee HJ, Kim JH, Kim IS, et al. Physiologic cervical alignment change between whole spine radiographs and normal standing cervical radiographs. World Neurosurg 2019 122:e1222-7.
103. Núñez-Pereira S, Hitzl W, Bullmann V, et al. Sagittal balance of the cervical spine: an analysis of occipitocerivcal and spinopelvic interdependence, with C-7 slope as a marker of cervical and spinopelvic alignment. J Neurosurg Spine 2015 12:16-23.
104. Tamai K, Buser Z, Paholpak P, et al. Can C7 slope substitute the T1 slope? An analysis of cervical spine raiographs and kinematic MRIs. Spine 2018 43:520-5.
106. Ye IB, Tang R, Cheung ZB, et al. Can C7 slope be used as a substitute for T1 slope? A radiographic analysis. Global Spine J 2020 10:148-52.
107. Jun HS, Chang IB, Song JH, et al. Is it possible to evaluate the parameters of cervical sagittal alignment on cervical computed tomographic scans? Spine 2014 39:E630-6.
108. Paholpak P, Nazareth A, Hsieh PC, et al. Kinematic evaluation of cervical sagittal balance and thoracic inlet alignment in degenerative cervical spondylolisthesis using kinematic magnetic resonance imaging. Spine J 2017 17:1272-84.
110. Zhang J, Buser Z, Abedi A, et al. Can C2-6 Cobb angle replace C2-7 Cobb angle? An analysis of cervical kinetic magnetic resonance images and X-rays. Spine 2018 44:240-5.
113. Passias PG, Vasquez-Montes D, Poorman GW, et al. Predictive model for distal junctional kyphosis after cervical deformity surgery. Spine J 2018 18:2187-94.
115. Lee SH, Kebaish KM, Sponseller PD. Upper thoracic osteotomy for cervical deformity. In: Ames CP, Riew KD, Smith JS, Abumi K editors. Cervical spine deformity surgery. New York: Thieme; 2019. p.100-10.
118. Virk S, Passias P, Lafage R, et al. Intraoperative alignment goals for distinctive sagittal morphotypes of severe cervical deformity to achieve optimal improvements in health-related quality of life measures. Spine J 2020 201267-75.
119. Murata K, Kenji E, Suzuki H, et al. Spinal sagittal alignment in patients with dropped head syndrome. Spine 2018 43:E1267-73.
120. Endo K, Kudo Y, Suzuki H, et al. Overview of dropped head syndrome (combined survey report of three facilities). J Orthop Sci 2019 24:1033-6.
123. Song J, Cui ZY, Chen ZH, et al. Analysis of the effect of surgical treatment for the patients with Hirayama disease from the perspective of cervical spine sagittal alignment. World Neurosurg 2020 133:e342-7.
124. Ajello M, Marengo M, Pilloni G, et al. Is it possible to evaluate the ideal cervical alignment for each patient needing surgery? An easy rule to determine the appropriate cervical lordosis in preoperative planning. World Neurosurg 2017 97:471-8.
125. Staub BN, Lafage R, Kim HJ, et al. Cervical mismatch: the normative value of T1 slope minus cervical lordosis and its ability to predict ideal cervical lordosis. J Neurosurg Spine 2019 30:31-7.
128. Nojiri K, Matsumoto M, Chiba K, et al. Relationship between alignment of upper and lower cervical spine in asymptomatic individuals. J Neurosurg 2003 99(1 Suppl):80-3.
129. Endo K, Suzuki H, Sawaji Y, et al. Relationship among cervical, thoracic, and lumbopelvic sagittal alignment in healthy adults. J Orthopaedic Surg 2016 24:92-6.
130. Guo Q, Ni B, Yang J, et al. Relation between alignments of upper and subaxial cervical spine: a radiological study. Acta Orthop Trauma Surg 2011 131:857-62.
132. Attiah M, Gaonkar B, Alkhalid Y, et al. Natural history of the aging spine: a cross-sectional analysis of spinopelvic parameters in the asymptomatic population. J Neurosurg Spine 2020 32:63-8.