Neurospine


Loss of Mass and Surface Topography in 3-Dimensional-Printed Solid Titanium Cages Upon Impaction: An In Vitro Model: Tien Tran, Ian M Singleton, Victor Ungurean Jr, Andrea Rowland, Anna Martin, Oluwatodimu Richard Raji, Dimitriy G. Kondrashov; Neurospine. 2025;22(1):173-184. Published online March 31, 2025; DOI: https://doi.org/10.14245/ns.2448990.495; Full text PubReader ePub PDF

Minimally invasive surgery
Effect of Cage Material and Size on Fusion Rate and Subsidence Following Biportal Endoscopic Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Ki-Han You, Samuel K. Cho, Jae-Yeun Hwang, Sun-Ho Cha, Min-Seok Kang, Sang-Min Park, Hyun-Jin Park; Neurospine. 2024;21(3):973-983. Published online September 30, 2024; DOI: https://doi.org/10.14245/ns.2448244.122
Web of Science 1 Crossref 4; Full text PubReader ePub PDF

Lumbosacral spine
Three-Dimensional-Printed Titanium Versus Polyetheretherketone Cages for Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Systematic Review of Comparative In Vitro, Animal, and Human Studies: Neal A. Patel, Sinead O’Bryant, Christopher D. Rogers, Candler K. Boyett, Sachiv Chakravarti, Julian Gendreau, Nolan J. Brown, Zach A. Pennington, Neill B. Hatcher, Cathleen Kuo, Luis Daniel Diaz-Aguilar, Martin H. Pham; Neurospine. 2023;20(2):451-463. Published online June 30, 2023; DOI: https://doi.org/10.14245/ns.2346244.122
Web of Science 14 Crossref 15; Full text PubReader ePub PDF

Minimally invasive surgery
Comparison Between 3-Dimensional-Printed Titanium and Polyetheretherketone Cages: 1-Year Outcome After Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Interbody Fusion: Do-Yeon Kim, O-Hyuk Kwon, Jeong-Yoon Park; Neurospine. 2022;19(3):524-532. Published online September 30, 2022; DOI: https://doi.org/10.14245/ns.2244140.070
Web of Science 23 Crossref 25; Full text PubReader ePub PDF

Search