Skip to main navigation Skip to main content
  • E-Submission
  • Contact us

NS : Neurospine

OPEN ACCESS
ABOUT
BROWSE ARTICLES
FOR AUTHORS

Page Path

2
results for

"Arun K. Srivastava"

Article category

Publication year

Keywords

Authors

"Arun K. Srivastava"

Original Article

Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:

Include:

A Universal Craniometric Index for Establishing the Diagnosis of Basilar Invagination
Neurospine. 2021;18(1):206-216.   Published online January 25, 2021
Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:
Include:
A Universal Craniometric Index for Establishing the Diagnosis of Basilar Invagination
Neurospine. 2021;18(1):206-216.   Published online January 25, 2021
Close
Objective
The conventional criteria for defining the basilar invagination (BI) focus on the relationship of odontoid tip to basion and opisthion, landmarks that are intrinsically variable especially in presence of occipitalised atlas. A universal single reference line is proposed that helps in unequivocally establishing the diagnosis of BI, may be relevant in establishing both Goel types A and B BI, as well as in differentiating a ‘very high’ from ‘regular’ BI.
Methods
Study design – case-control study. In 268 patients (group I with BI [n = 89] including Goel type A BI [n = 66], Goel type B BI [n = 23], and group II controls [n = 179]), the perpendicular distance between odontoid tip and line subtended between posterior tip of hard palate-internal occipital protuberance (P-IOP line) was measured. Logistic regression analysis determined factors influencing the proposed parameter (p < 0.05).
Results
In patients with a ‘very high’ BI (n = 5), the odontoid tip intersected/or was above the P-IOP line. In patients with a ‘regular’ BI (n = 84), the odontoid tip was 6.56 ± 3.9mm below the P-IOP line; while in controls, this distance was 12.53 ± 4.28 mm (p < 0.01). In Goel type A BI, the distance was 7.01 ± 3.78 mm and in type B BI, it was 5.07 ± 4.19 mm (p = 0.004). Receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis identified 9.0 mm (8.92–9.15 mm) as the cut-point for diagnosing BI using the odontoid tip-P-IOP line distance as reference.
Conclusion
The odontoid tip either intersecting the P-IOP line (very high BI) or being < 9 mm below the P-IOP line (Goel types A and B BI) is recommended as highly applicable criteria to establish the diagnosis of BI. This parameter may be useful in establishing the diagnosis in all varieties of BI.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  Crossref logo
  • A review and commentary on congenital anomalies of the craniocervical junction
    Aaron S McAllister, Eric A Sribnick
    Pediatric Radiology.2026; 56(6): 1254.     CrossRef
  • Pediatric complex Chiari I Malformation—how complex is it?
    Amparo Saenz, Honglin Zhu, Jasneet Dhaliwal, Sniya Sudhakar, Kshitij Mankad, Dominic Thompson, M. Zubair Tahir
    Child's Nervous System.2026;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Basilar Invagination Diagnosis, Classification, and Radiology
    Onur Yaman, Mehmet Zileli, İdris Avci, Zan Chen, June Ho Lee, Geraldo Sá-Carneiro, Francesco Costa, Said Ait Ben Ali, Fernando Dantas, Joachim Oertel, Massimiliano Visocchi, Jutty Parthiban, Atul Goel, Ricardo Botelho, Oscar L. Alves
    Spine.2025; 50(11): E200.     CrossRef
  • Evaluation of Angular Parameters of Craniocervical Junction and Establishing their Relevance in the Diagnosis of Basilar Invagination
    Kulwant Singh, Vikrant Yadav, Ravi Shankar Prasad, Anurag Sahu, Nityanand Pandey
    Indian Journal of Neurosurgery.2025; 14(02): 148.     CrossRef
  • Current update and trend of 3D printing in spinal surgery: A bibliometric analysis and review of literature
    Rieva Ermawan, Hubertus Corrigan, Nanang Wiyono
    Journal of Orthopaedics.2024; 50: 22.     CrossRef
  • Forensic evaluation of craniometric characteristics of the Kazakhstan population
    Saule A. Mussabekova, Anastasiya O. Stoyan, Xeniya E. Mkhitaryan, Saule B. Zhautikova
    Journal of Oral Biology and Craniofacial Research.2024; 14(4): 370.     CrossRef
  • Chamberlain's Line Violation in Basilar Invagination Patients Compared with Normal Subjects: A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis
    Andrei F. Joaquim, Alécio Cristino Evangelista Santos Barcelos, Jefferson Walter Daniel, Ricardo Vieira Botelho
    World Neurosurgery.2023; 173: e364.     CrossRef
  • Risk Factors of Postoperative Cerebrospinal Fluid Leak After Craniovertebral Junction Anomalies Surgery: A Case-Control Study
    Yu Xiao, Bing Wang, Yulian Chen, Lingqiang Chen, Zhenkai Lou, Zhiqiang Gong
    Neurospine.2023; 20(1): 255.     CrossRef
  • Intra-articular Distraction Versus Decompression to Treat Basilar Invagination Without Atlantoaxial Dislocation: A Retrospective Cohort Study of 54 Patients
    Boyan Zhang, Maoyang Qi, Zong Xin, Yueqi Du, Can Zhang, Zhenlei Liu, Jian Guan, Zuowei Wang, Fengzeng Jian, Wanru Duan, Zan Chen
    Neurospine.2023; 20(2): 498.     CrossRef
  • Characteristics and evaluation of C1 posterior arch variation for transpedicular screw placement between patients with and without basilar invagination
    Lu-Ping Zhou, Chen-Hao Zhao, Zhi-Gang Zhang, Jin Shang, Hua-Qing Zhang, Fang Ma, Chong-Yu Jia, Ren-Jie Zhang, Cai-Liang Shen
    European Spine Journal.2023; 32(10): 3547.     CrossRef
  • Posterior one is not the only approach
    Jayesh Sardhara
    Journal of Spinal Surgery.2022; 9(1): 6.     CrossRef
  • Ideal entry point and trajectory for C2 pedicle screw placement in basilar invagination patients with high-riding vertebral artery based on 3D computed tomography
    Lu-Ping Zhou, Ren-Jie Zhang, Zhen-Fei Jiang, Er-Xu Tao, Jin Shang, Cai-Liang Shen
    The Spine Journal.2022; 22(8): 1281.     CrossRef
  • Characteristics and Comparisons of Morphometric Measurements and Computed Tomography Hounsfield Unit Values of C2 Laminae for Translaminar Screw Placement Between Patients With and Without Basilar Invagination
    Lu-Ping Zhou, Jin Shang, Zhi-Gang Zhang, Zhen-Fei Jiang, Hua-Qing Zhang, Chong-Yu Jia, Ren-Jie Zhang, Cai-Liang Shen
    Neurospine.2022; 19(4): 899.     CrossRef
  • Commentary on “A Universal Craniometric Index for Establishing the Diagnosis of Basilar Invagination”
    Mehmet Bilgin Eser, Begumhan Baysal
    Neurospine.2021; 18(3): 644.     CrossRef
  • Reply to Commentary on “A Universal Craniometric Index for Establishing the Diagnosis of Basilar Invagination”
    Jayesh Sardhara, Sanjay Behari
    Neurospine.2021; 18(3): 646.     CrossRef
  • 14,796 View
  • 547 Download
  • 15 Web of Science
  • 15 Crossref

Review Article

APCSS special Topic-Craniovertebral Junction Surgery

Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:

Include:

Is Cervical Stabilization for All Cases of Chiari-I Malformation an Overkill? Evidence Speaks Louder Than Words!
Neurospine. 2019;16(2):195-206.   Published online June 30, 2019
Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:
Include:
Is Cervical Stabilization for All Cases of Chiari-I Malformation an Overkill? Evidence Speaks Louder Than Words!
Neurospine. 2019;16(2):195-206.   Published online June 30, 2019
Close
Chiari I malformation is characterized by the downward displacement of cerebellar tonsils through the foramen magnum. While discussing the treatment options for Chiari I malformation, the points of focus include: (1) Has the well-established procedure of posterior fossa decompression become outdated and has been replaced by posterior C1–2 stabilization in every case? (2) In case posterior stabilization is required, should a C1–2 stabilization, rather than an occipitocervical fusion, be the only procedure recommended? The review of literature revealed that when there is bony instability like atlantoaxial dislocation (AAD), occipito-atlanto-axial facet joint asymmetry or basilar invagination (BI) associated with Chiari I malformation, one should address the anterior bony compression as well as perform stabilization. This takes care of the compromised canal at the foramen magnum and re-establishes the cerebrospinal fluid flow along the craniospinal axis; and also provides treatment for CVJ instability. In the cases with a pure Chiari I malformation without AAD or BI and with completely symmetrical C1–2 joints, however, posterior fossa decompression with or without duroplasty is sufficient to bring about neurological improvement. The latter subset of cases with pure Chiari I malformation have, thus, shown significant (>70%) rates of neurological improvement with posterior fossa decompression alone. A C1–2 posterior stabilization is a more stable construct due to the strong bony purchase provided by the C1–2 lateral masses and the short lever arm of the construct. However, in the cases with significant bleeding from paravertebral venous plexus; a very high BI, condylar hypoplasia and occipitalized atlas; gross C1–2 rotation or vertical C1–2 joints with unilateral C1 or C2 facet hypoplasia, as well as the presence of subaxial scoliosis; maldevelopment of the lateral masses and facet joints (as in very young patients); or, the artery lying just posterior to the C1–2 facet joint capsule (being endangered by the C1–2 stabilization procedure), it may be safer to perform an occipitocervical rather than a C1–2 fusion.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  Crossref logo
  • Pediatric complex Chiari I Malformation—how complex is it?
    Amparo Saenz, Honglin Zhu, Jasneet Dhaliwal, Sniya Sudhakar, Kshitij Mankad, Dominic Thompson, M. Zubair Tahir
    Child's Nervous System.2026;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Posterior C1–C2 screw-rod salvage for Chiari I malformation with atlantoaxial instability after failed foramen magnum decompression
    Shengli Guo, Luokai Huangfu, Guangyu Qiao
    Journal of Craniovertebral Junction and Spine.2026; 17(4): 392.     CrossRef
  • Atlantoaxial Instability Could be Observed in Patients with Chiari Malformation
    Daisuke Umebayashi, Sho Nishii, Naoya Hashimoto
    Spinal Surgery.2026; 40(2): 140.     CrossRef
  • Incidence and Management of Basilar Invagination With Associated Chiari I Malformation
    Jörg Klekamp, Oscar L. Alves, Mehmet Zileli, Joachim Oertel, Onur Yaman, Salman Sharif, Massimiliano Visocchi, Atul Goel, Ricardo Botelho
    Spine.2025; 50(11): 786.     CrossRef
  • Surgical Management of Chiari 1.5 in Children: A Truly Different Disease?
    Ignazio G. Vetrano, Arianna Barbotti, Tommaso Francesco Galbiati, Sabrina Mariani, Alessandra Erbetta, Luisa Chiapparini, Veronica Saletti, Laura G. Valentini
    Journal of Clinical Medicine.2024; 13(6): 1708.     CrossRef
  • Technical Considerations in Surgical Fixation of Jefferson Fracture
    Hitesh Kumar Gurjar, Hitesh Inder Singh Rai, Shashwat Mishra, Kanwaljeet Garg
    Indian Journal of Neurotrauma.2023; 20(02): 140.     CrossRef
  • Full‐endoscopic technique for posterior fossa decompression in Chiari malformation type I: An anatomical feasibility study in human cadavers
    I. Dolas, A. G. Yorukoglu, A. Sencer, Tugrul Cem Unal, C. I. Gulsever, A. Aydoseli, Y. Aras, P. A. Sabanci, S. Ruetten
    Clinical Anatomy.2023; 36(4): 660.     CrossRef
  • Manual Therapy and Exercise for the Management of Chronic Neck Pain With Multiple Neurovascular Comorbidities: A Case Report
    Zach Mayo, Christopher Keating
    Cureus.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • C1-2 Fusion in Atlantoaxial Dislocation and Basilar Invagination with and without Chiari Malformation: Clinical/Radiological and Craniometric Results
    Haitao Zhu, Rui Xu, Shengxi Wang, Haijian Xia, Yi Yan, Yongzhi Xia
    World Neurosurgery.2023; 175: e1017.     CrossRef
  • A rare clinical case of syringomyelia progression in the presence of Chiari I malformation following the surgery
    E. E. Rostorguev, N. S. Kuznetsova, A. A. Maslov, V. E. Hatyushin, B. V. Matevosyan, G. A. Reznik, O. V. Pandova, E. V. Shalashnaya
    South Russian Journal of Cancer.2023; 4(3): 44.     CrossRef
  • Mobility Assessment Using Multi-Positional MRI in Children with Cranio-Vertebral Junction Anomalies
    Flavie Grenier-Chartrand, Maxime Taverne, Syril James, Lelio Guida, Giovanna Paternoster, Klervie Loiselet, Kevin Beccaria, Volodia Dangouloff-Ros, Raphaël Levy, Timothée de Saint Denis, Thomas Blauwblomme, Roman Hossein Khonsari, Nathalie Boddaert, Sandr
    Journal of Clinical Medicine.2023; 12(21): 6714.     CrossRef
  • Research process, recap, and prediction of Chiari malformation based on bicentennial history of nomenclature and terms misuse
    Yunsen He, Mengjun Zhang, Xiaohong Qin, Caiquan Huang, Ping Liu, Ye Tao, Yishuang Wang, Lili Guo, Mingbin Bao, Hongliang Li, Zhenzhen Mao, Nanxiang Li, Zongze He, Bo Wu
    Neurosurgical Review.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Relevance of C1/2 Facet Configurations and Clivus-Canal-Angles for Adult Patients with Chiari I Malformation with and without Basilar Invagination
    Jörg Klekamp
    World Neurosurgery.2022; 162: e156.     CrossRef
  • Development and Validation of a Multivariable Model to Predict Surgical Outcome in Patients with Chiari malformations
    Shishir Kumar, Komal P. Chandrachari, Kiran Mariswamappa, Shibu V. Pillai, Vishwas H. Vijayendra, Sathyanarayana Lale, Thimappa Hegde
    Neurology India.2022; 70(3): 905.     CrossRef
  • The management of Chiari malformation type 1 and syringomyelia in children: a review of the literature
    Veronica Saletti, Mariangela Farinotti, Paola Peretta, Luca Massimi, Palma Ciaramitaro, Saba Motta, Alessandra Solari, Laura Grazia Valentini
    Neurological Sciences.2021; 42(12): 4965.     CrossRef
  • Prognostic significance of C1–C2 facet malalignment after surgical decompression in adult Chiari malformation type I: a pilot study based on the Chicago Chiari Outcome Scale
    Michael Lumintang Loe, Tito Vivas-Buitrago, Ricardo A. Domingo, Johan Heemskerk, Shashwat Tripathi, Bernard R. Bendok, Mohamad Bydon, Alfredo Quinones-Hinojosa, Kingsley Abode-Iyamah
    Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine.2021; 34(2): 171.     CrossRef
  • Chiari malformation type I and basilar invagination originating from atlantoaxial instability: a literature review and critical analysis
    Arthur Wagner, Lukas Grassner, Nikolaus Kögl, Sebastian Hartmann, Claudius Thomé, Maria Wostrack, Bernhard Meyer
    Acta Neurochirurgica.2020; 162(7): 1553.     CrossRef
  • The battle against an invisible enemy
    Manjul Tripathi, Sandeep Mohindra
    Acta Neurochirurgica.2020; 162(11): 2923.     CrossRef
  • Central Atlantoaxial Instability: A New Clinical Entity?
    Justin S. Smith
    Neurospine.2019; 16(2): 212.     CrossRef
  • The Role of Atlantoaxial Instability on Chiari, Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament, Spondylosis and Stenosis
    K. Daniel Riew
    Neurospine.2019; 16(2): 214.     CrossRef
  • 13,596 View
  • 245 Download
  • 26 Web of Science
  • 20 Crossref