Objective There is a lack of literature on indirect decompression in uniportal endoscopic posterolateral transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (EPTLIF). Our aim is to evaluate the dimensions of the spinal canal and contralateral foramen before and after EPTLIF.
Methods This is a retrospective study of patients who underwent EPTLIF in a tertiary spine centre over a 2-year period. The cross-sectional area of the spinal canal and the contralateral foramen at the level of fusion were measured on magnetic resonance imaging scan at 1-day postoperation and at the final follow-up. Patients were grouped according to the decompression performed as per the clinician’s judgement.
Results One hundred fifty-two levels of fusion were performed in 120 patients. There was a statistically significant clinical improvement in visual analogue scale and Oswestry Disability Index scores postoperation. The measurements of the spinal canal area were 106.0 mm2, 138.8 mm2, and 195.5 mm2; while contralateral foraminal area were 73.2 mm2, 104.4 mm2, and 120.7 mm2 at preoperation, 1-day postoperation, and at the final follow-up, respectively (p < 0.001). For the subgroup analyses, spinal canal area measurements for the bilateral decompression cohort (n = 35) were 57.0 mm2, 123.9 mm2, and 191.8 mm2; for the ipsilateral decompression cohort (n = 42) were 89.3 mm2, 128.9 mm2, 183.3 mm2; and for the cohort without any decompression and only cage inserted (n = 75) were 138.3 mm2, 151.2 mm2, and 204.1 mm2 (p < 0.001). Contralateral foraminal area measurements were 73.3 mm2, 106.4 mm2 and 120.4 mm2 in the bilateral decompression cohort; 69.5 mm2, 99.0 mm2, 116.9 mm2 in the ipsilateral decompression cohort; and 75.1 mm2, 106.5 mm2, 122.9 mm2 in the cohort without any decompression (p < 0.001).
Conclusion Indirect decompression of both the spinal canal and the contralateral foramen can be achieved via EPTLIF. Decompression on an asymptomatic contralateral side is not necessary.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Computed tomography imaging for exploring the appropriate angle of a visible Trephine in endoscopic spine lumbar interbody fusion Wei Wang, Yukai Cui, Xiaohao Sun, Wen Yin, Xilong Cui, Haiyang Yu, Wenjie Diao, Wenbo Diao, Wei Jiao European Spine Journal.2026; 35(6): 3448. CrossRef
Robot-assisted unilateral biportal endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion for lumbar spondylolisthesis: ipsilateral direct with contralateral indirect decompression Han Yi, Siyang He, Senglin Zhang, Peng Liu, Shu Lin, Kun Zhang, Jiang Hu, Fei Wang, Fang Tang, Wei Zhang BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders.2026;[Epub] CrossRef
Outcomes in Lumbar Fusion Patients Stratified by the Clinical and Radiographic Degenerative Spondylolisthesis (CARDS) Classification System Justin J Turcotte, Jane C Brennan, Parimal Rana, Andrea H Johnson, Chad Patton Cureus.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Trends in degenerative lumbar spinal surgery during the early COVID-19 pandemic in Republic of Korea: A national study utilizing the national health insurance database Woon Tak Yuh, Jinhee Kim, Mi-Sook Kim, Jun-Hoe Kim, Young Rak Kim, Sum Kim, Chun Kee Chung, Chang-Hyun Lee, Sung Bae Park, Kyoung-Tae Kim, John M. Rhee, Young San Ko, Chi Heon Kim, Kentaro Yamada PLOS ONE.2024; 19(6): e0305128. CrossRef
Can unilateral-transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion replace the traditional transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion procedure for lumbar degenerative disc diseases?: a single center matched case-control mid-term outcome study Sajan Karunakar Hegde, Appaji Krishnamurthy Krishnan, Vigneshwara Badikkillaya, Sharan Talacauvery Achar, Harith Baddula Reddy, Akshyaraj Alagarasan, Rochita Venkataramanan Asian Spine Journal.2024; 18(6): 846. CrossRef