Objective Posterior fossa decompression is the treatment of choice in type 1 Chiari malformation (CM-1) without bony instability. Although surgical fixation has been recommended by a few authors recently, comparative studies to evaluate these treatment strategies using objective outcome tools are lacking.
Methods Seventy-three patients with pure CM-1 (posterior fossa bony decompression [PFBD], n = 21; posterior fossa bony and dural decompression [PFBDD], n = 40; and posterior fixation [PF], n = 12) underwent a postoperative outcome assessment using Chicago Chiari Outcome Score (CCOS). Logistic regression analysis detected predictors of an unfavorable outcome.
Results Minimally symptomatic patients generally underwent a PFBD while most of the clinically severe patients underwent a PFBDD (p = 0.049). The mean CCOS score at discharge was highest in the PF (12.0 ± 1.41) and lowest in PFBDD group (10.98 ± 1.73, p = 0.087). Patients with minimal preoperative clinical disease severity (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 4.58; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.29–16.31) and PFBDD (AOR, 7.56; 95% CI, 1.70–33.68) represented risks for an unfavorable short-term postoperative outcome. Though long-term outcomes (CCOS) did not differ among the 3 groups (p = 0.615), PFBD group showed the best long-term improvements (mean follow-up CCOS, 13.71 ± 0.95), PFBDD group improved to a comparable degree despite a poorer short-term outcome while PF had the lowest scores. Late deteriorations (n = 3, 4.1%) occurred in the PFBDD group.
Conclusion Minimally symptomatic patients and PFBDD predict a poor short-term postoperative outcome. PFBD appears to be a durable procedure while PFBDD group is marred by complications and late deteriorations. PF does not provide any better results than posterior fossa decompression alone in the long run.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
C1-C2 Fixation for Chiari with Syringomyelia Associated with Atlantoaxial Instability, Atlantooccipital Assimilation and an Anomalous Vertebral Artery Course Chirag Jain, Nupur Pruthi World Neurosurgery.2024; 191: 37. CrossRef
Low versus High Intracranial Compliance in Adult Patients with Chiari Malformation Type 1–Comparison of Long-Term Outcome After Tailored Treatment Radek Frič, Geir Ringstad, Per Kristian Eide World Neurosurgery.2023; 173: e699. CrossRef
Chiari Syndrome: Advances in Epidemiology and Pathogenesis: A Systematic Review Raquel Rodríguez-Blanque, Cristina Almazán-Soto, Beatriz Piqueras-Sola, Juan Carlos Sánchez-García, Andrés Reinoso-Cobo, María José Menor-Rodríguez, Jonathan Cortés-Martín Journal of Clinical Medicine.2023; 12(20): 6694. CrossRef
Individualized Functional Decompression Options for Adult Chiari Malformation With Syringomyelia and A Novel Scale for Syringomyelia Resolution: A Single-Center Experience Shiyuan Han, Bo Hou, Zhimin Li, Feng Feng, Yongning Li, Jun Gao Neurospine.2023; 20(4): 1501. CrossRef
Letter to the Editor. Outcome prediction and assessment after surgery in CM-I: there is more to it than meets the eye Kuntal Kanti Das, Jaskaran Singh Gosal, Deepak Khatri, Arun K. Srivastava Journal of Neurosurgery.2022; 136(3): 934. CrossRef
Commentary on “Frailty Status Is a More Robust Predictor Than Age of Spinal Tumor Surgery Outcomes: A NSQIP Analysis of 4,662 Patients” Moon-Jun Sohn Neurospine.2022; 19(1): 63. CrossRef
Relationship Between Syrinx Resolution and Cervical Sagittal Realignment Following Decompression Surgery for Chiari I Malformation Related Syringomyelia Based on Configuration Phenotypes Chunli Lu, Longbing Ma, Jian Guan, Zhenlei Liu, Kai Wang, Wanru Duan, Zan Chen, Hao Wu, Fengzeng Jian Neurospine.2022; 19(4): 1057. CrossRef
Role of Atlas Assimilation in the Context of Craniocervical Junction Anomalies Andrei Fernandes Joaquim, Alécio Cristino Evangelista Santos Barcelos, Jefferson Walter Daniel World Neurosurgery.2021; 151: 201. CrossRef
Objective The conventional criteria for defining the basilar invagination (BI) focus on the relationship of odontoid tip to basion and opisthion, landmarks that are intrinsically variable especially in presence of occipitalised atlas. A universal single reference line is proposed that helps in unequivocally establishing the diagnosis of BI, may be relevant in establishing both Goel types A and B BI, as well as in differentiating a ‘very high’ from ‘regular’ BI.
Methods Study design – case-control study. In 268 patients (group I with BI [n = 89] including Goel type A BI [n = 66], Goel type B BI [n = 23], and group II controls [n = 179]), the perpendicular distance between odontoid tip and line subtended between posterior tip of hard palate-internal occipital protuberance (P-IOP line) was measured. Logistic regression analysis determined factors influencing the proposed parameter (p < 0.05).
Results In patients with a ‘very high’ BI (n = 5), the odontoid tip intersected/or was above the P-IOP line. In patients with a ‘regular’ BI (n = 84), the odontoid tip was 6.56 ± 3.9mm below the P-IOP line; while in controls, this distance was 12.53 ± 4.28 mm (p < 0.01). In Goel type A BI, the distance was 7.01 ± 3.78 mm and in type B BI, it was 5.07 ± 4.19 mm (p = 0.004). Receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis identified 9.0 mm (8.92–9.15 mm) as the cut-point for diagnosing BI using the odontoid tip-P-IOP line distance as reference.
Conclusion The odontoid tip either intersecting the P-IOP line (very high BI) or being < 9 mm below the P-IOP line (Goel types A and B BI) is recommended as highly applicable criteria to establish the diagnosis of BI. This parameter may be useful in establishing the diagnosis in all varieties of BI.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
A review and commentary on congenital anomalies of the craniocervical junction Aaron S McAllister, Eric A Sribnick Pediatric Radiology.2026; 56(6): 1254. CrossRef
Pediatric complex Chiari I Malformation—how complex is it? Amparo Saenz, Honglin Zhu, Jasneet Dhaliwal, Sniya Sudhakar, Kshitij Mankad, Dominic Thompson, M. Zubair Tahir Child's Nervous System.2026;[Epub] CrossRef
Basilar Invagination Diagnosis, Classification, and Radiology Onur Yaman, Mehmet Zileli, İdris Avci, Zan Chen, June Ho Lee, Geraldo Sá-Carneiro, Francesco Costa, Said Ait Ben Ali, Fernando Dantas, Joachim Oertel, Massimiliano Visocchi, Jutty Parthiban, Atul Goel, Ricardo Botelho, Oscar L. Alves Spine.2025; 50(11): E200. CrossRef
Evaluation of Angular Parameters of Craniocervical Junction and Establishing their Relevance in the Diagnosis of Basilar Invagination Kulwant Singh, Vikrant Yadav, Ravi Shankar Prasad, Anurag Sahu, Nityanand Pandey Indian Journal of Neurosurgery.2025; 14(02): 148. CrossRef
Current update and trend of 3D printing in spinal surgery: A bibliometric analysis and review of literature Rieva Ermawan, Hubertus Corrigan, Nanang Wiyono Journal of Orthopaedics.2024; 50: 22. CrossRef
Forensic evaluation of craniometric characteristics of the Kazakhstan population Saule A. Mussabekova, Anastasiya O. Stoyan, Xeniya E. Mkhitaryan, Saule B. Zhautikova Journal of Oral Biology and Craniofacial Research.2024; 14(4): 370. CrossRef
Chamberlain's Line Violation in Basilar Invagination Patients Compared with Normal Subjects: A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis Andrei F. Joaquim, Alécio Cristino Evangelista Santos Barcelos, Jefferson Walter Daniel, Ricardo Vieira Botelho World Neurosurgery.2023; 173: e364. CrossRef
Risk Factors of Postoperative Cerebrospinal Fluid Leak After Craniovertebral Junction Anomalies Surgery: A Case-Control Study Yu Xiao, Bing Wang, Yulian Chen, Lingqiang Chen, Zhenkai Lou, Zhiqiang Gong Neurospine.2023; 20(1): 255. CrossRef
Intra-articular Distraction Versus Decompression to Treat Basilar Invagination Without Atlantoaxial Dislocation: A Retrospective Cohort Study of 54 Patients Boyan Zhang, Maoyang Qi, Zong Xin, Yueqi Du, Can Zhang, Zhenlei Liu, Jian Guan, Zuowei Wang, Fengzeng Jian, Wanru Duan, Zan Chen Neurospine.2023; 20(2): 498. CrossRef
Characteristics and evaluation of C1 posterior arch variation for transpedicular screw placement between patients with and without basilar invagination Lu-Ping Zhou, Chen-Hao Zhao, Zhi-Gang Zhang, Jin Shang, Hua-Qing Zhang, Fang Ma, Chong-Yu Jia, Ren-Jie Zhang, Cai-Liang Shen European Spine Journal.2023; 32(10): 3547. CrossRef
Posterior one is not the only approach Jayesh Sardhara Journal of Spinal Surgery.2022; 9(1): 6. CrossRef
Ideal entry point and trajectory for C2 pedicle screw placement in basilar invagination patients with high-riding vertebral artery based on 3D computed tomography Lu-Ping Zhou, Ren-Jie Zhang, Zhen-Fei Jiang, Er-Xu Tao, Jin Shang, Cai-Liang Shen The Spine Journal.2022; 22(8): 1281. CrossRef
Characteristics and Comparisons of Morphometric Measurements and Computed Tomography Hounsfield Unit Values of C2 Laminae for Translaminar Screw Placement Between Patients With and Without Basilar Invagination Lu-Ping Zhou, Jin Shang, Zhi-Gang Zhang, Zhen-Fei Jiang, Hua-Qing Zhang, Chong-Yu Jia, Ren-Jie Zhang, Cai-Liang Shen Neurospine.2022; 19(4): 899. CrossRef
Commentary on “A Universal Craniometric Index for Establishing the Diagnosis of Basilar Invagination” Mehmet Bilgin Eser, Begumhan Baysal Neurospine.2021; 18(3): 644. CrossRef
Reply to Commentary on “A Universal Craniometric Index for Establishing the Diagnosis of Basilar Invagination” Jayesh Sardhara, Sanjay Behari Neurospine.2021; 18(3): 646. CrossRef
Objective Joint manipulation for craniovertebral junction instability is often hindered by the C2-ganglion (C2G). Our study aims to compare the surgical outcome among patients with or without C2G preservation and discuss the technical nuances.
Methods We did a prospective, bicentric study and included all the operated patients with craniovertebral junction anomaly. The outcome was assessed by the Pain Numeric Rating Scale, Patient Satisfactions Score, and Stony Brook Scar Evaluation Scale. The fusion was assessed using Lenke fusion grade.
Results One hundred seventy-one patients (88 in group A and 83 in group B) were included. The most common symptom was spastic quadriparesis (n = 165, 96.5%) with median Nurick grade 3.3. Thirteen patients had suboccipital numbness and 12 patients had paraesthesia. Mean blood loss in group A was 490 ± 96.2 mL and group B was 525 ± 45.7 mL; median operative time was 217.9 and 162.2 minutes in the groups A and B, respectively (p < 0.05). At the follow-up (median, 46.8 months), Lenke fusion grade A was achieved in 92.4% and grade B in 7.6%. A trend suggesting better functional outcomes (numbness, parestheisa, scar outcome, and postoperative ulcer formation) in group A was seen with all 6 patients, who underwent O-C2 fixation, developed pressure sore.
Conclusion Our results support ganglion preservation, especially in the subset of patients where occipital plating is required. Although the study fails to show any statistical significance, we suggest that one should always start with an ‘intent’ of preservation as the functional outcome is better.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Cutting the Cord: Risks, Rewards, and Techniques of C2 Nerve Ligation Arun K. Movva, Kaitlyn L. Hurka, Julia Kaniuk, Rushmin Khazanchi, William B. Marcus, Jake A. Morales, Joshua M. Tennyson, Daniel E. Herrera, Mark A. Plantz, Jason Tegethoff, Tyler Compton, Henry Hilow, Parth Desai, Srikanth N. Divi, Wellington K. Hsu, Alp Contemporary Spine Surgery.2025; 26(11): 1. CrossRef
An institutional study on accuracy of freehand cervical C1 C2 screws placement by knock and drill technique in craniovertebral anomalous bony anatomy: An evaluation of more than 600 screws based on SGPGI screw accuracy criteria Sudhir Bisan Sasapardhi, Pawan Kumar Verma, Arun Kumar Srivastava, Kuntal Kanti Das, Ashutosh Kumar, Priyadarshi Dikshit, Ved Prakash Maurya, Kamlesh Singh Bhaisora, Anant Mehrotra, Awadhesh Kumar Jaiswal, Prabhaker Mishra, Sanjay Behari, Raj Kumar, Harsh Journal of Craniovertebral Junction and Spine.2024; 15(1): 83. CrossRef
Safety and efficacy of the new modified technique for c2 nerve root resection in 3d fluoroscopy navigated instrumentation in the cranio-cervical junction Lukas Bobinski, Linda Sandberg, Frida Bylander, Hampus Hållberg, Anders Berglund, John M. Duff Acta Neurochirurgica.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
C2 Nerve Root Preservation During Posterior Fixation for Instability Secondary to Congenital Craniovertebral Junction Anomalies: Feasibility Factors and Related Outcomes Shivanna Puneeth, Madhivanan Karthigeyan, Pravin Salunke, Chirag Panchal, Mandeep Singh Kataria World Neurosurgery.2022; 157: e94. CrossRef
Surgical Versus Conservative Management for Treating Unstable Atlas Fractures: A Multicenter Study Jun Jae Shin, Kwang-Ryeol Kim, Joongkyum Shin, Jiin Kang, Ho Jin Lee, Tae Woo Kim, Jae Taek Hong, Sang-Woo Kim, Yoon Ha Neurospine.2022; 19(4): 1013. CrossRef
Prophylaxis of occipital pressure sores in patients after elective spinal surgery in a pandemic condition Piotr Tederko, Victoria Perovic-Kaczmarek, Robert Gasik, Beata Tarnacka Rheumatology.2022; 60(2): 153. CrossRef
Commentary on “A Prospective, Single-Blinded, Bicentric Study, and Literature Review to Assess the Need of C2-Ganglion Preservation - SAVIOUR’s Criteria” James S. Harrop Neurospine.2021; 18(1): 96. CrossRef
8,214
View
149
Download
7
Crossref
Review Article
APCSS special Topic-Craniovertebral Junction Surgery
Chiari I malformation is characterized by the downward displacement of cerebellar tonsils through the foramen magnum. While discussing the treatment options for Chiari I malformation, the points of focus include: (1) Has the well-established procedure of posterior fossa decompression become outdated and has been replaced by posterior C1–2 stabilization in every case? (2) In case posterior stabilization is required, should a C1–2 stabilization, rather than an occipitocervical fusion, be the only procedure recommended? The review of literature revealed that when there is bony instability like atlantoaxial dislocation (AAD), occipito-atlanto-axial facet joint asymmetry or basilar invagination (BI) associated with Chiari I malformation, one should address the anterior bony compression as well as perform stabilization. This takes care of the compromised canal at the foramen magnum and re-establishes the cerebrospinal fluid flow along the craniospinal axis; and also provides treatment for CVJ instability. In the cases with a pure Chiari I malformation without AAD or BI and with completely symmetrical C1–2 joints, however, posterior fossa decompression with or without duroplasty is sufficient to bring about neurological improvement. The latter subset of cases with pure Chiari I malformation have, thus, shown significant (>70%) rates of neurological improvement with posterior fossa decompression alone. A C1–2 posterior stabilization is a more stable construct due to the strong bony purchase provided by the C1–2 lateral masses and the short lever arm of the construct. However, in the cases with significant bleeding from paravertebral venous plexus; a very high BI, condylar hypoplasia and occipitalized atlas; gross C1–2 rotation or vertical C1–2 joints with unilateral C1 or C2 facet hypoplasia, as well as the presence of subaxial scoliosis; maldevelopment of the lateral masses and facet joints (as in very young patients); or, the artery lying just posterior to the C1–2 facet joint capsule (being endangered by the C1–2 stabilization procedure), it may be safer to perform an occipitocervical rather than a C1–2 fusion.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Pediatric complex Chiari I Malformation—how complex is it? Amparo Saenz, Honglin Zhu, Jasneet Dhaliwal, Sniya Sudhakar, Kshitij Mankad, Dominic Thompson, M. Zubair Tahir Child's Nervous System.2026;[Epub] CrossRef
Posterior C1–C2 screw-rod salvage for Chiari I malformation with atlantoaxial instability after failed foramen magnum decompression Shengli Guo, Luokai Huangfu, Guangyu Qiao Journal of Craniovertebral Junction and Spine.2026; 17(4): 392. CrossRef
Atlantoaxial Instability Could be Observed in Patients with Chiari Malformation Daisuke Umebayashi, Sho Nishii, Naoya Hashimoto Spinal Surgery.2026; 40(2): 140. CrossRef
Incidence and Management of Basilar Invagination With Associated Chiari I Malformation Jörg Klekamp, Oscar L. Alves, Mehmet Zileli, Joachim Oertel, Onur Yaman, Salman Sharif, Massimiliano Visocchi, Atul Goel, Ricardo Botelho Spine.2025; 50(11): 786. CrossRef
Surgical Management of Chiari 1.5 in Children: A Truly Different Disease? Ignazio G. Vetrano, Arianna Barbotti, Tommaso Francesco Galbiati, Sabrina Mariani, Alessandra Erbetta, Luisa Chiapparini, Veronica Saletti, Laura G. Valentini Journal of Clinical Medicine.2024; 13(6): 1708. CrossRef
Technical Considerations in Surgical Fixation of Jefferson Fracture Hitesh Kumar Gurjar, Hitesh Inder Singh Rai, Shashwat Mishra, Kanwaljeet Garg Indian Journal of Neurotrauma.2023; 20(02): 140. CrossRef
Full‐endoscopic technique for posterior fossa decompression in Chiari malformation type I: An anatomical feasibility study in human cadavers I. Dolas, A. G. Yorukoglu, A. Sencer, Tugrul Cem Unal, C. I. Gulsever, A. Aydoseli, Y. Aras, P. A. Sabanci, S. Ruetten Clinical Anatomy.2023; 36(4): 660. CrossRef
Manual Therapy and Exercise for the Management of Chronic Neck Pain With Multiple Neurovascular Comorbidities: A Case Report Zach Mayo, Christopher Keating Cureus.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
C1-2 Fusion in Atlantoaxial Dislocation and Basilar Invagination with and without Chiari Malformation: Clinical/Radiological and Craniometric Results Haitao Zhu, Rui Xu, Shengxi Wang, Haijian Xia, Yi Yan, Yongzhi Xia World Neurosurgery.2023; 175: e1017. CrossRef
A rare clinical case of syringomyelia progression in the presence of Chiari I malformation following the surgery E. E. Rostorguev, N. S. Kuznetsova, A. A. Maslov, V. E. Hatyushin, B. V. Matevosyan, G. A. Reznik, O. V. Pandova, E. V. Shalashnaya South Russian Journal of Cancer.2023; 4(3): 44. CrossRef
Mobility Assessment Using Multi-Positional MRI in Children with Cranio-Vertebral Junction Anomalies Flavie Grenier-Chartrand, Maxime Taverne, Syril James, Lelio Guida, Giovanna Paternoster, Klervie Loiselet, Kevin Beccaria, Volodia Dangouloff-Ros, Raphaël Levy, Timothée de Saint Denis, Thomas Blauwblomme, Roman Hossein Khonsari, Nathalie Boddaert, Sandr Journal of Clinical Medicine.2023; 12(21): 6714. CrossRef
Research process, recap, and prediction of Chiari malformation based on bicentennial history of nomenclature and terms misuse Yunsen He, Mengjun Zhang, Xiaohong Qin, Caiquan Huang, Ping Liu, Ye Tao, Yishuang Wang, Lili Guo, Mingbin Bao, Hongliang Li, Zhenzhen Mao, Nanxiang Li, Zongze He, Bo Wu Neurosurgical Review.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Relevance of C1/2 Facet Configurations and Clivus-Canal-Angles for Adult Patients with Chiari I Malformation with and without Basilar Invagination Jörg Klekamp World Neurosurgery.2022; 162: e156. CrossRef
Development and Validation of a Multivariable Model to Predict Surgical Outcome in Patients with Chiari malformations Shishir Kumar, Komal P. Chandrachari, Kiran Mariswamappa, Shibu V. Pillai, Vishwas H. Vijayendra, Sathyanarayana Lale, Thimappa Hegde Neurology India.2022; 70(3): 905. CrossRef
The management of Chiari malformation type 1 and syringomyelia in children: a review of the literature Veronica Saletti, Mariangela Farinotti, Paola Peretta, Luca Massimi, Palma Ciaramitaro, Saba Motta, Alessandra Solari, Laura Grazia Valentini Neurological Sciences.2021; 42(12): 4965. CrossRef
Prognostic significance of C1–C2 facet malalignment after surgical decompression in adult Chiari malformation type I: a pilot study based on the Chicago Chiari Outcome Scale Michael Lumintang Loe, Tito Vivas-Buitrago, Ricardo A. Domingo, Johan Heemskerk, Shashwat Tripathi, Bernard R. Bendok, Mohamad Bydon, Alfredo Quinones-Hinojosa, Kingsley Abode-Iyamah Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine.2021; 34(2): 171. CrossRef
Chiari malformation type I and basilar invagination originating from atlantoaxial instability: a literature review and critical analysis Arthur Wagner, Lukas Grassner, Nikolaus Kögl, Sebastian Hartmann, Claudius Thomé, Maria Wostrack, Bernhard Meyer Acta Neurochirurgica.2020; 162(7): 1553. CrossRef
The battle against an invisible enemy Manjul Tripathi, Sandeep Mohindra Acta Neurochirurgica.2020; 162(11): 2923. CrossRef
Central Atlantoaxial Instability: A New Clinical Entity? Justin S. Smith Neurospine.2019; 16(2): 212. CrossRef
The Role of Atlantoaxial Instability on Chiari, Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament, Spondylosis and Stenosis K. Daniel Riew Neurospine.2019; 16(2): 214. CrossRef
First
Prev
