Objective To evaluate the direct costs of various spinal surgical procedures within 1 year of follow-up and to compare the profiles of neurosurgeons and orthopedic surgeons.
Methods All spinal procedures performed within a 10-month period in patients covered by a private insurance company were included. Costs related to the spinal interventions were systematically registered in the company database. Associated costs during the 1-year follow-up were recorded.
Results In total, 1,862 patients were included, with a total cost of €11,050,970, of whom 34.8% underwent noninstrumented lumbar decompression (€3,473), 27.1% dorsolumbar instrumented fusion (€6,619), 14.6% nucleoplasty (€1,323), 13.5% cervical surgery (€4,463), 3.4% kyphoplasty (€4,200), 2.9% scoliosis (€15,414), 1.2% oncologic surgery (€5,590), 0.5% traumatic compression (€7,844), and 4.7% (€1,343) other minor interventions (mainly rhizotomies). Approximately 42% of patients required reinterventions within the first year, with a global extra cost of €7,280,073; 11% were referred to the pain clinic, with a €114,663 cost; 55.5% were men; and the most common age range of patients who received an intervention was 65–75 years. Neurosurgeons performed 60% of all interventions. Noninstrumented lumbar operations were performed by neurosurgeons twice as often as instrumented operations, and they performed 76% of cervical operations. Orthopedic surgeons performed 2.5 times more instrumented than noninstrumented lumbar operations, and almost all scoliosis and rhizotomy procedures.
Conclusion The direct costs of spinal surgery in Spain were generally lower than those reported in other European Union countries and the United States. Neurosurgeons and orthopedic surgeons had different spine surgical profiles and costs.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Wound Closure and Wound Dressings in Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery From the AO Spine Surveillance of Post-Operative Management Shin Oe, Ganesh Swamy, Martin Gagliardi, Stephen J. Lewis, So Kato, Christopher I. Shaffrey, Lawrence G. Lenke, Yukihiro Matsuyama Global Spine Journal.2025; 15(1): 152. CrossRef
Comparative assessment of surgical outcomes and cost-efficiency between orthopedic surgeons and neurosurgeons in degenerative lumbar spine surgery: a systematic review with pairwise and proportional meta-analysis Yixi Wang, Rui Zhang, Qiuyuan Huang, Yang Xiao, Alafate Kahaer, Paerhati Rexiti, Ming Xia Neurosurgical Review.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
A Retrospective Cohort Analysis Comparing the Costs of Ankle Fracture Fixation in Orthopaedics and Podiatry in a U.S. Medicare Limited Data Set James Meyers, Peter Campbell, Alexander Lieber, Joshua Luginbuhl, Nicole Zubizarreta, Eric Gokcen, Jashvant Poeran, Meghan Kelly Foot & Ankle International.2024; 45(11): 1279. CrossRef
Direct medical costs after surgical or nonsurgical treatment for degenerative lumbar spinal disease: A nationwide matched cohort study with a 10-year follow-up Chi Heon Kim, Chun Kee Chung, Yunhee Choi, Juhee Lee, Seung Heon Yang, Chang Hyun Lee, Sung Bae Park, Kyoung-Tae Kim, John M. Rhee, Moon Soo Park, Dean Chou PLOS ONE.2021; 16(12): e0260460. CrossRef
Letter: Cost-Effectiveness Research in Neurosurgery: We Can and We Must John J Y Zhang, Keng Siang Lee Neurosurgery.2020; 86(6): E587. CrossRef
Neurosurgery versus orthopedic surgery: Who has better access to minimally invasive spinal technology? Alfredo José Guiroy, Matias Pereira Duarte, Juan Pablo Cabrera, Nicolás Coombes, Martin Gagliardi, Alberto Gotfryd, Charles Carazzo, Nestor Taboada, Asdrubal Falavigna Surgical Neurology International.2020; 11: 385. CrossRef
First
Prev
