Objective Spinal stenosis is a prevalent condition; however, the optimal surgical treatment for central lumbar stenosis remains controversial. This study compared the clinical outcomes and radiological parameters of 3 surgical methods: unilateral laminectomy bilateral decompression with unilateral biportal endoscopy (ULBD-UBE), conventional subtotal laminectomy (STL), and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF).
Methods This retrospective study included 86 patients, divided into ULBD-UBE (n=34), STL (n=24), and MIS-TLIF (n=28) groups. We evaluated demographics and perioperative factors and assessed clinical outcomes using the visual analogue scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and neurogenic intermittent claudication (NIC). Radiological parameters assessed included lumbar lordosis, L4S1 Cobb angle (L4S1), T12S1 Cobb angle (T12S1), increased cross-sectional dural area (CSA), dynamic angulation (DA), dynamic slip (DS), and development of postoperative instability.
Results The ULBD-UBE group showed a significantly shorter hospital stay duration and operation time and reduced blood loss than the other groups (p<0.001). ULBD-UBE group showed a trend towards greater VAS and ODI improvement at 1 month and postoperative NIC symptom relief. Radiologically, MIS-TLIF group exhibited lower postoperative DA and DS (p<0.001), indicating higher postoperative stability. Postoperative instability was lower in the ULBD-UBE group (2.9%) than in the STL group (16.7%) and similar to the MIS-TLIF group (0.0%) (p=0.028). The CSA was highest in the MIS-TLIF group (295.5%) compared to that in the other groups (ULBD-UBE, 216.3%; STL, 245.2%) (p<0.001).
Conclusion Compared to other procedures, ULBD-UBE is a safe, effective, and viable surgical procedure for treating lumbar central stenosis.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Bilateral versus Unilateral Decompression in Single-Level Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Degenerative Spondylolisthesis: A Retrospective Comparative Study Lu-ming Nong, Jian-jian Yin, Gong-ming Gao, Nan-wei Xu, Gong-yin Zhao, Yu-qing Jiang, Long Han World Neurosurgery.2026; 206: 124784. CrossRef
Comparison of paraspinal muscle changes after biportal endoscopic and microscopic lumbar discectomy or decompression Ki-Han You, Sang-Min Park, Daniel Park, Min-Seok Kang, Seung-Yeon Jeong, Sun-Ho Cha, Samuel Cho, Hyun-Jin Park European Spine Journal.2026;[Epub] CrossRef
O‐Arm Navigation Enhances Facet Preservation Without Compromising Clinical Outcomes in UBE Decompression for Radiographically Stable Adult Degenerative Scoliosis: A Single‐Center Comparative Study Yi Liu, Yiwei Xie, Zhibao Chen, Ruijun Xu, Haojie Chen, Xiaojian Ye, Jiangming Yu Orthopaedic Surgery.2026; 18(6): 1203. CrossRef
A minimally invasive robotic spinal surgical system for anterior lumbar nerve decompression Qingxiang Zhao, Xiandi Wang, Xin Zhong, Runfeng Zhu, Peizhi Zhou, Dan Pu, Baitao Lin, Tao Li, Shiyuan Sui, Haonan Zhou, Yuxi Cheng, Hao Zheng, Henry K. Chu, Jiancheng Zeng, Kang Li Science Robotics.2026;[Epub] CrossRef
Totally endoscopic trans‑superior articular process lumbar interbody fusion: A case series on the development and preliminary evaluation of an innovative minimally invasive lumbar spine surgical technique Hualv Liu, Junjie Li, Yuhao Gao, Shilei Qin, Pengfei Han, Yunfeng Xu Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine.2025; 30(1): 1. CrossRef
Bilateral–Contralateral Endoscopic Decompression as a Fusion-Deferral Strategy in Upper Lumbar Stenosis: A Structural Rationale and Conditional Framework—A Technical Note with Cases Review Dong Hyun Lee, Sang Yeop Han, Seung Young Jeong, Il-Tae Jang Journal of Clinical Medicine.2025; 14(16): 5726. CrossRef
Reply Letter: A Commentary on “Comparative Outcomes of Biportal Endoscopic Decompression, Conventional Subtotal Laminectomy, and Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Lumbar Central Stenosis” Jeong-Yoon Park Neurospine.2025; 22(3): 875. CrossRef
Efficacy of unilateral biportal endoscopy vs. unilateral portal endoscopy for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis Yongjia Yu, Yuguang An, Chang Liu, Kemin Wang, Wuqiao Liang, Huazhong Gan, Zhaoju Hong, Qingmei Zhang, Maolin He, Daqin Feng Frontiers in Surgery.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
A Commentary on “Comparative Outcomes of Biportal Endoscopic Decompression, Conventional Subtotal Laminectomy, and Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Lumbar Central Stenosis” Xiangge Liu Neurospine.2025; 22(3): 873. CrossRef
Comparison of unilateral biportal endoscopic lumbar fusion and modified minimally invasive tubular lumbar fusion for lumbar disc herniation: a two-year retrospective study Jialong Qi, Mingxiang Liu, Tao Shan, Zhou Dong, Guosong Han, Zhihao Ni, Ke Zheng, Li Ma, Zhidong Zhang Frontiers in Neurology.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Objective The study compared the morphometric changes of the cervical spinal cord using dynamic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) and assessed the correlation with kinematic changes, cord cross-sectional area (CSA), and high signal intensity (SI) on T2-weighted imaging (T2WI).
Methods Patients with CSM were evaluated through dynamic MRI for sagittal and axial CSA changes of the cervical cord, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) reserve ratio, degree of cord impingement, cord compression rate, range of motion (ROM), and severity of SI on T2WI. The degree of cord impingement was evaluated using the Muhle grading system. Clinical outcomes were assessed using Japanese Orthopaedic Association scoring and Nurick grade.
Results The study included 191 patients (113 males) with a mean age of 55.34 ± 12.09 years. The lowest sagittal CSF reserve ratio and cord occupation rate were observed during extension. Cord impingement and SI change were more prevalent in extension-positioned MRI. There was no difference between ROM on dynamic radiographs and dynamic MRI. Preoperative cervical ROM was greater in patients with intensely high SI change.
Conclusion Dynamic MRI is useful for evaluating neck movement. Patients with high SI had greater ROM before surgery but worse outcomes after. Neck extension exacerbated cervical stenosis and cord compression compared to flexion, and cervical spinal motion contributed to the severity of CSM. Cervical spinal motion should be carefully evaluated, particularly in hyperextension, to prevent worsening of CSM.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Dynamic K-Line Status and Surgical Outcomes in Multilevel Cervical OPLL: A Multicenter Comparative Study Jun Jae Shin, Sun Joon Yoo, Se Jun Park, Dong Kyu Kim, Hyun Jun Jang, Bong Ju Moon, Kyung Hyun Kim, Jeong Yoon Park, Sung Uk Kuh, Dong Kyu Chin, Keun Su Kim, Chang Kyu Lee, Keung Nyun Kim, Tae Woo Kim, Yoon Ha Journal of Clinical Medicine.2026; 15(2): 520. CrossRef
Dynamic Cervical Myelopathy Misleading on Neutral Imaging: The Role of Flexion–Extension MRI Leonardo Anselmi, Donato Creatura, Mario De Robertis, Ali Baram, Emanuele Stucchi, Gabriele Capo, Jad El Choueiri, Federico Pessina, Maurizio Fornari, Carlo Brembilla Journal of Clinical Medicine.2026; 15(4): 1333. CrossRef
Intramedullary Strain During Neck Extension is Associated with Microstructural Spinal Cord Injury in Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy Mahmudur Rahman, Karthik Banurekha Devaraj, Balaji Harinathan, Omkar Chauhan, Matthew Budde, Narayan Yoganandan, Aditya Vedantam Annals of Biomedical Engineering.2026;[Epub] CrossRef
Predictive factors for outcomes of anterior-only surgery in multilevel pincer-type cervical spondylotic myelopathy: The role of the posterior compression score Lin Xie, Wenbo Wu, Kun Wang, Yu Song, Xianlin Zeng, Cao Yang, Xiaobo Feng Journal of Orthopaedics.2026; 75: 305. CrossRef
The Role of Dynamic Cervical Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Determining the Level of Posterior Decompression in Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy Luay Şerifoğlu, Abdulmutalip Karaaslanlı World Neurosurgery.2025; 195: 123698. CrossRef
T2-weighted MRI high signal in cervical spondylotic myelopathy is associated with dynamic change Xiangzhen Kong, Zhenchuan Liu, Kangle Song, Keyu Pan, Yuanqiang Zhang, Jianlu Wei, Lei Cheng Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
X-ray Diagnostics of Degenerative Spinal Canal Stenosis at the Cervical Level (Literature Review) V. S. Petrova, P. V. Seliverstov, V. A. Sorokovikov, S. N. Larionov Radiology - Practice.2025; (2): 28. CrossRef
Weight-bearing MRI of the cervical spine: A scoping review of clinical utility and emerging applications Jonathan Verderame, Muhammad Shakib Arslan, Farhan Mukhtar, Zaheer Abbas European Journal of Radiology Open.2025; 15: 100694. CrossRef
Evaluation of Cases Diagnosed with Cervical Myelopathy or Syringomyelia Referred with a Preliminary Diagnosis of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Nimet Ucaroglu Can Online Türk Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi.2025; 10(3): 239. CrossRef
Posture-dependent assessment of whole-spine curvature with a rotatable cryogen-free 1.5T MRI and automated Cobb angle analysis Shiying Ke, Hengyuan Guo, Yulin Wang, Jichang Zhang, Pengfei Xu, Jianjun Zheng, Bin Chen, Chendie Yao, Thomas Meersmann, Chengbo Wang European Spine Journal.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Dynamic MRI in Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: A Systematic Review of Radiological Markers, Correlations, and Outcomes Ali Baram, Jad El Choueiri, Carlo Brembilla, Francesca Pellicanò, Lorenzo De Rossi, Leonardo Di Cosmo, Mario De Robertis, Emanuele Stucchi, Donato Creatura, Gabriele Capo, Maurizio Fornari, Marco Riva, Letterio S. Politi, Federico Pessina Journal of Clinical Medicine.2025; 15(1): 265. CrossRef
Flexion K-Line Status Predicts Surgical Strategy in Multilevel Cervical Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament: A Multicenter Comparison of Laminoplasty and Laminectomy With Fusion Jun Jae Shin, Sun Joon Yoo, Se Jun Park, Dong Kyu Kim, Hyun Jun Jang, Bong Ju Moon, Kyung Hyun Kim, Jeong Yoon Park, Sung Uk Kuh, Dong Kyu Chin, Keun Su Kim, Yong Eun Cho, Chang Kyu Lee, Dong Ah Shin, Seong Yi, Keung Nyun Kim, Joongkyum Shin, Yoon Ha Neurospine.2025; 22(4): 937. CrossRef
From the Editor-in-Chief: Featured Articles in the June 2024 Issue Inbo Han Neurospine.2024; 21(2): 373. CrossRef
Commentary on “Radiological and Clinical Significance of Cervical Dynamic Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy” Aydin Sinan Apaydin, Khoi Than Neurospine.2024; 21(2): 455. CrossRef
First
Prev
