Skip to main navigation Skip to main content
  • E-Submission
  • Contact us

NS : Neurospine

OPEN ACCESS
ABOUT
BROWSE ARTICLES
FOR AUTHORS

Page Path

3
results for

"Patrick C. Hsieh"

Article category

Publication year

Keywords

Authors

Funded articles

"Patrick C. Hsieh"

Commentary

Minimally Invasive Surgery

Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:

Include:

A Commentary on “Beyond the Microscope: Is Endoscopic Discectomy the Next Gold Standard for Lumbar Disc Herniation?”
Neurospine. 2026;23(1):80-81.   Published online January 31, 2026
Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:
Include:
A Commentary on “Beyond the Microscope: Is Endoscopic Discectomy the Next Gold Standard for Lumbar Disc Herniation?”
Neurospine. 2026;23(1):80-81.   Published online January 31, 2026
Close
  • 2,266 View
  • 42 Download

Original Articles

Health Services Research

Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:

Include:

International Practice Patterns in the Surgical Management of Primary Lumbar Disc Herniation: An AO Spine Cross-Sectional Study
Neurospine. 2026;23(1):31-39.   Published online January 31, 2026
Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:
Include:
International Practice Patterns in the Surgical Management of Primary Lumbar Disc Herniation: An AO Spine Cross-Sectional Study
Neurospine. 2026;23(1):31-39.   Published online January 31, 2026
Close
Objective
This study aimed to characterize international practice patterns in the surgical management of primary lumbar disc herniation (LDH) among AO Spine surgeons.
Methods
A cross-sectional online survey was distributed in September 2024 to AO Spine members. The questionnaire collected detailed information on demographic characteristics, surgical indications, preferred techniques, and approaches for primary LDH treatment. Data on specialty, practice setting, fellowship training, and surgical case volume were analyzed using univariate and multivariate logistic regression to identify significant associations between surgeon characteristics and treatment preferences.
Results
A total of 714 surgeons participated, representing diverse regions: North America (9.0%), Latin America (18.7%), Europe & Southern Africa (34.7%), Middle East & Northern Africa (12.8%), and Asia Pacific (24.8%). Neurological status was the most critical factor influencing early operative treatment in nonurgent cases, while bladder/bowel dysfunction and severe motor deficits were the primary indications in urgent scenarios. The majority of respondents (54.2%) preferred a mini-open technique—using either a surgical microscope or loupes—with partial laminotomy (58.1%) and partial discectomy (63.2%) being the most frequently performed procedures. Regional variations and differences in surgeon training were significantly associated with the choice of surgical approach and overall case volume.
Conclusion
The findings reveal substantial variability in the surgical management of primary LDH across regions and specialties. This comprehensive dataset underscores the need for standardized, evidence-based guidelines to harmonize treatment strategies and optimize patient outcomes.
  • 3,175 View
  • 160 Download
  • 1 Web of Science

Degenerative Spinal Diseases

Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:

Include:

Open Versus Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery in the Treatment of Single-Level Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis: An AO Spine Global Cross-Sectional Study
Neurospine. 2025;22(1):40-47.   Published online March 31, 2025
Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:
Include:
Open Versus Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery in the Treatment of Single-Level Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis: An AO Spine Global Cross-Sectional Study
Neurospine. 2025;22(1):40-47.   Published online March 31, 2025
Close
Objective
This study aims to assess global trends in the use of open surgery versus minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for the treatment of single-level L4–5 degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis (DLS).
Methods
A cross-sectional online survey issued by the AO Spine Knowledge Forum Degenerative was conducted among AO Spine members between July and September 2023. Participants were presented with 3 clinical cases of L4–5 grade 1 DLS, each with varying degrees of stenosis and instability. The survey captured surgeon demographics and preferences for open versus MIS approaches. Statistical analysis, including chi-square tests and logistic regression, was performed to explore associations between surgical choices and surgeon demographics.
Results
A total of 943 surgeons responded, with 479 completing the survey. Open surgery was the preferred approach in all 3 cases (58.8%, 57.3%, and 42.4%, respectively), particularly in cases involving central and bilateral foraminal stenosis. MIS was the second most common choice, particularly for unilateral foraminal stenosis with mild instability (38.8%). Surgeons’ preferences varied significantly by region, age, and fellowship training, with younger and fellowship-trained surgeons more likely to prefer MIS.
Conclusion
The study highlights the continued predominance of open surgery for DLS, especially in complex cases, despite the growing acceptance of MIS. Significant regional and demographic variations in surgical preferences suggest the need for tailored guidelines and standardized training protocols to optimize patient outcomes. Future research should focus on the long-term efficacy of these approaches and the impact of evolving technologies on surgical decision-making.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  Crossref logo
  • Minimally Invasive Options for Spondylolisthesis
    Chibuikem A. Ikwuegbuenyi, Mousa Hamad, Ibrahim Hussain, Roger Härtl
    Neurosurgery Clinics of North America.2026; 37(1): 39.     CrossRef
  • Long-term comparative study of Open-TLIF, MIS-TLIF, and UBE-TLIF in single-level degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis
    Jian Luo, Lihua Shen, Changshen Bao, Zhichao Gao
    European Journal of Medical Research.2026;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Clinical Efficacy Of Sodium Heptasaponin Combined With Diosmin In Postoperative Patients Undergoing Posterior Open Surgery For Degenerative Diseases Of The Spine: A Retrospective Study
    Canglu Wu
    Pakistan Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences.2026;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Current Trends and Future Directions in Lumbar Spine Surgery: A Review of Emerging Techniques and Evolving Management Paradigms
    Gianluca Galieri, Vittorio Orlando, Roberto Altieri, Manlio Barbarisi, Alessandro Olivi, Giovanni Sabatino, Giuseppe La Rocca
    Journal of Clinical Medicine.2025; 14(10): 3390.     CrossRef
  • 7,020 View
  • 117 Download
  • 4 Web of Science
  • 4 Crossref