Objective
Bracing after lumbar discectomy surgery (LDS) is a controversial topic with paucity of related scientific literature. Previous surveys on spine surgeons’ preferences were limited both in geographical coverage and number of respondents. The aim of this study is to fill this gap in the literature.
Methods
An international online survey among AO Spine members regarding the postoperative recommendations for bracing (PoBr), activity restriction (AR), and associated factors, was performed.
Results
A total of 703 spine surgeons participated in the survey of which 34% recommended PoBr, with half of them reported usage for 4 weeks. Main influencing variables were being from Europe/South Africa region, greater extent of bony decompression, and larger amount of excised disc material. Seventy-nine percent of the respondents recommended postoperative AR. Prolonged standing, prolonged sitting, and driving were usually restricted for 2 weeks. Bending, twisting, lifting, and low-intensity physical activities for 3 months, while high-intensity physical activities and direct contact sports for 6 months were restricted.
Conclusion
Despite recent literature insights showing limited evidence of efficacy, 34% and 80% of a large cohort of international surgeons practice bracing and recommend AR after LDS for variable durations. Extensive bony decompression and radical discectomy significantly influenced the decision to brace, similarly endoscopic approaches and radical discectomy influenced the decision to restrict activity. These findings emphasize the persistent evidence-practice gap and the wide variability on the global level. More randomized controlled trials are warranted on this topic to reach an evidence-based recommendation.

Objective
This study aimed to characterize international practice patterns in the surgical management of primary lumbar disc herniation (LDH) among AO Spine surgeons.
Methods
A cross-sectional online survey was distributed in September 2024 to AO Spine members. The questionnaire collected detailed information on demographic characteristics, surgical indications, preferred techniques, and approaches for primary LDH treatment. Data on specialty, practice setting, fellowship training, and surgical case volume were analyzed using univariate and multivariate logistic regression to identify significant associations between surgeon characteristics and treatment preferences.
Results
A total of 714 surgeons participated, representing diverse regions: North America (9.0%), Latin America (18.7%), Europe & Southern Africa (34.7%), Middle East & Northern Africa (12.8%), and Asia Pacific (24.8%). Neurological status was the most critical factor influencing early operative treatment in nonurgent cases, while bladder/bowel dysfunction and severe motor deficits were the primary indications in urgent scenarios. The majority of respondents (54.2%) preferred a mini-open technique—using either a surgical microscope or loupes—with partial laminotomy (58.1%) and partial discectomy (63.2%) being the most frequently performed procedures. Regional variations and differences in surgeon training were significantly associated with the choice of surgical approach and overall case volume.
Conclusion
The findings reveal substantial variability in the surgical management of primary LDH across regions and specialties. This comprehensive dataset underscores the need for standardized, evidence-based guidelines to harmonize treatment strategies and optimize patient outcomes.

Objective
This study aims to assess global trends in the use of open surgery versus minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for the treatment of single-level L4–5 degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis (DLS).
Methods
A cross-sectional online survey issued by the AO Spine Knowledge Forum Degenerative was conducted among AO Spine members between July and September 2023. Participants were presented with 3 clinical cases of L4–5 grade 1 DLS, each with varying degrees of stenosis and instability. The survey captured surgeon demographics and preferences for open versus MIS approaches. Statistical analysis, including chi-square tests and logistic regression, was performed to explore associations between surgical choices and surgeon demographics.
Results
A total of 943 surgeons responded, with 479 completing the survey. Open surgery was the preferred approach in all 3 cases (58.8%, 57.3%, and 42.4%, respectively), particularly in cases involving central and bilateral foraminal stenosis. MIS was the second most common choice, particularly for unilateral foraminal stenosis with mild instability (38.8%). Surgeons’ preferences varied significantly by region, age, and fellowship training, with younger and fellowship-trained surgeons more likely to prefer MIS.
Conclusion
The study highlights the continued predominance of open surgery for DLS, especially in complex cases, despite the growing acceptance of MIS. Significant regional and demographic variations in surgical preferences suggest the need for tailored guidelines and standardized training protocols to optimize patient outcomes. Future research should focus on the long-term efficacy of these approaches and the impact of evolving technologies on surgical decision-making.