Skip to main navigation Skip to main content
  • E-Submission
  • Contact us

NS : Neurospine

OPEN ACCESS
ABOUT
BROWSE ARTICLES
FOR CONTRIBUTORS

Page Path

1
results for

"So Kato"

Article category

Publication year

Keywords

Authors

"So Kato"

Original Article

Regular Issue

Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:

Include:

Surgeon Preference Regarding Wound Dressing Management in Lumbar Fusion Surgery: An AO Spine Global Cross-Sectional Study
Neurospine. 2024;21(1):204-211.   Published online March 31, 2024
Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:
Include:
Surgeon Preference Regarding Wound Dressing Management in Lumbar Fusion Surgery: An AO Spine Global Cross-Sectional Study
Neurospine. 2024;21(1):204-211.   Published online March 31, 2024
Close
Objective
To evaluate the global practice pattern of wound dressing use after lumbar fusion for degenerative conditions.
Methods
A survey issued by AO Spine Knowledge Forums Deformity and Degenerative was sent out to AO Spine members. The type of postoperative dressing employed, timing of initial dressing removal, and type of subsequent dressing applied were investigated. Differences in the type of surgery and regional distribution of surgeons’ preferences were analyzed.
Results
Right following surgery, 60.6% utilized a dry dressing, 23.2% a plastic occlusive dressing, 5.7% glue, 6% a combination of glue and polyester mesh, 2.6% a wound vacuum, and 1.2% other dressings. The initial dressing was removed on postoperative day 1 (11.6%), 2 (39.2%), 3 (20.3%), 4 (1.7%), 5 (4.3%), 6 (0.4%), 7 or later (12.5%), or depending on drain removal (9.9%). Following initial dressing removal, 75.9% applied a dry dressing, 17.7% a plastic occlusive dressing, and 1.3% glue, while 12.1% used no dressing. The use of no additional coverage after initial dressing removal was significantly associated with a later dressing change (p < 0.001). Significant differences emerged after comparing dressing management among different AO Spine regions (p < 0.001).
Conclusion
Most spine surgeons utilized a dry or plastic occlusive dressing initially applied after surgery. The first dressing was more frequently changed during the first 3 postoperative days and replaced with the same type of dressing. While dressing policies tended not to vary according to the type of surgery, regional differences suggest that actual practice may be based on personal experience rather than available evidence.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  Crossref logo
  • Duration of Wound Coverage for the Prevention of Surgical Site Infections After Surgery: A Systematic Review of Current Evidence With Meta‐Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials
    Moira D. Cruickshank, Kirsty Loudon, Paul D. Manson, George Ramsay, Miriam G. Brazzelli
    International Wound Journal.2026;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • The AO Spine Knowledge Forums: A Decade of Impactful Spine Research
    Klaus John Schnake, Michael G. Fehlings, Niccole Germscheid, Shekar Kurpad, Ilya Laufer, Stephen J. Lewis, Gregory D. Schroeder, S. Tim Yoon, Charles G. Fisher
    Global Spine Journal.2025; 15(7): 3039.     CrossRef
  • Two-week post-operative dressing: balancing cost and surgical site infection risk in orthopaedic procedures
    Musa Muhammad, Aliyu M. Maigoro, Lamidi Jimoh, Rabiu A. Rufai, Oni N. Salawu, Shamsuddeen Muhammad, Sani A. Giade, Kabir B. Jatto, Shem B. Yilleng
    International Journal of Research in Orthopaedics.2025; 12(1): 30.     CrossRef
  • 6,876 View
  • 128 Download
  • 2 Web of Science
  • 3 Crossref