Skip to main navigation Skip to main content
  • E-Submission
  • Contact us

NS : Neurospine

OPEN ACCESS
ABOUT
BROWSE ARTICLES
FOR AUTHORS

Page Path

1
results for

"Wyatt B. David"

Article category

Publication year

Keywords

Authors

Funded articles

"Wyatt B. David"

Original Article

Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:

Include:

Cement Augmentation of Vertebral Compression Fractures May Be Safely Considered in the Very Elderly
Neurospine. 2021;18(1):226-233.   Published online March 31, 2021
Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:
Include:
Cement Augmentation of Vertebral Compression Fractures May Be Safely Considered in the Very Elderly
Neurospine. 2021;18(1):226-233.   Published online March 31, 2021
Close
Objective
The objective of the current study was to perform a retrospective review of a national database to assess the safety of cement augmentation for vertebral compression fractures in geriatric populations in varying age categories.
Methods
The 2005–2016 National Surgical Quality Improvement Program databases were queried to identify patients undergoing kyphoplasty or vertebroplasty in the following age categories: 60–69, 70–79, 80–89, and 90+ years old. Demographic variables, comorbidity status, procedure type, provider specialty, inpatient/outpatient status, number of procedure levels, and periprocedure complications were compared between age categories using chi-square analysis. Multivariate logistic regressions controlling for patient and procedural variables were then performed to assess the relative periprocedure risks of adverse outcomes of patients in the different age categories relative to those who were 60–69 years old.
Results
For the 60–69, 70–79, 80–89, and 90+ years old cohorts, 486, 822, 937, and 215 patients were identified, respectively. After controlling for patient and procedural variables, 30-day any adverse events, serious adverse events, reoperation, readmission, and mortality were not different for the respective age categories. Cases in the 80- to 89-year-old cohort were at increased risk of minor adverse events compared to cases in the 60- to 69-year-old cohort.
Conclusion
As the population ages, cement augmentation is being considered as a treatment for vertebral compression fractures in increasingly older patients. These results suggest that even the very elderly may be appropriately considered for these procedures (level of evidence: 3).

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  Crossref logo
  • Surgical management of spinal metastases from primary lung carcinoma: demographics, clinical characteristics, and outcomes—A retrospective analysis
    Jun Li, Yuhan Zheng, Xiaohua Lv, Rong Zeng, Yating Zhao, Yucheng Xiang, Ke Zhan, Congcong Liu, Houqing Long, Ke Chen
    Frontiers in Surgery.2026;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Advantages of TiRobot-assisted surgery in the treatment of osteoporotic thoracolumbar compression fractures: a meta-analysis based on multiple clinical indicators
    Yu Liu, Zidong Xia, Huiling Chen, Jian Wang, Mengtian Cao, Guohang Shen, Mingyuan Fan, Kaiyong Wang, Yang Chen, Yupei Dai
    Journal of Robotic Surgery.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Spinal augmentation for vertebral body fractures in the elderly population
    Alexander R. Evans, Taylor Niznik, Chao Li, Zachary A. Smith
    GeroScience.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • The future of ambulatory surgery for geriatric patients
    Mary Ann Vann
    Best Practice & Research Clinical Anaesthesiology.2023; 37(3): 343.     CrossRef
  • What are the risk factors for a second osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture?
    Sang Hoon Hwang, Pyung Goo Cho, Kyoung-Tae Kim, Keung Nyun Kim, Sang Hyun Kim, Sung Hyun Noh
    The Spine Journal.2023; 23(11): 1586.     CrossRef
  • Beyond Pain Relief: An In-Depth Review of Vertebral Height Restoration After Balloon Kyphoplasty in Vertebral Compression Fractures
    Siddharth K Patel, Sohael Khan, Ventaktesh Dasari, Suvarn Gupta
    Cureus.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Risk of Revision After Vertebral Augmentation for Osteoporotic Vertebral Fracture: A Narrative Review
    Shinji Takahashi, Hiroyuki Inose, Koji Tamai, Masayoshi Iwamae, Hidetomi Terai, Hiroaki Nakamura
    Neurospine.2023; 20(3): 852.     CrossRef
  • The Effectiveness of Vertebral Height Restoration Based on the Vertebroplasty Procedure Used to Treat Osteoporotic Vertebral Fractures
    Kunio Yokoyama, Naokado Ikeda, Hidekazu Tanaka, Yutaka Ito, Akira Sugie, Makoto Yamada, Masahiko Wanibuchi, Masahiro Kawanishi
    Neurospine.2023; 20(4): 1159.     CrossRef
  • Treatment for Osteoporotic Vertebral Fracture - A Short Review of Orthosis and Percutaneous Vertebroplasty and Balloon Kyphoplasty
    Masahiro Kawanishi, Hidekazu Tanaka, Yutaka Ito, Makoto Yamada, Kunio Yokoyama, Akira Sugie, Naokado Ikeda
    Neurospine.2023; 20(4): 1124.     CrossRef
  • Commentary on “Utilization of Vertebroplasty/Kyphoplasty in the Management of Compression Fractures: National Trends and Predictors of Vertebroplasty/Kyphoplasty”
    Sahir S. Jabbouri, Peter G. Whang
    Neurospine.2023; 20(4): 1140.     CrossRef
  • Difference in the Cobb Angle Between Standing and Supine Position as a Prognostic Factor After Vertebral Augmentation in Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures
    In-Suk Bae, Byung Gwan Moon, Hee In Kang, Jae Hoon Kim, Cheolsu Jwa, Deok Ryeong Kim
    Neurospine.2022; 19(2): 357.     CrossRef
  • Kyphoplasty: why, when and how?
    Umile Giuseppe Longo, Rocco Papalia, Sergio De Salvatore, Valentina Piccioni, Vincenzo Denaro
    International Journal of Bone Fragility.2022; 2(1): 41.     CrossRef
  • 11,311 View
  • 222 Download
  • 11 Web of Science
  • 12 Crossref