Objective Contact casting with plaster bandages is a standard technique for thoraco-lumbo-sacral orthosis (TLSO) fabrication. However, this hands-on process depends on the operator’s skill as well as requires a close physical contact, involving potential risks of coronavirus and influenza virus infection and the patient’s personal space violation. Recently, noncontact, highly accurate molding technology using 3-dimensional (3D) digital scanning has been developed. Although 3D scanning is widely applied for limb orthosis, its spinal application mainly focuses on pediatric scoliosis. Comparative studies across diverse body types remain limited. Therefore, this study aimed to clarify the adaptability, accuracy, and fabrication time of TLSO produced using noncontact 3D digital scanning, comparing with conventional contact plaster-bandage casting.
Methods TLSO was fabricated using both contact and noncontact techniques for mannequins with 4 different body types. High-precision scanner and computed tomography (CT) were used to assess the shape reproducibility by quantifying the gap area between the orthosis and mannequin. In addition, total fabrication time was compared between the 2 techniques.
Results High-precision scanner identified that 3D scanning showed a higher shape reproducibility than conventional casting, particularly in curvilinear areas (all p<0.001). In CT measurement, 3D scanning demonstrated a smaller gap area in all the body types (all p<0.001). Fabrication time was also shorter during 3D scanning (54.9±0.9 minutes) than during conventional casting (100.0±5.5 minutes) (p<0.001).
Conclusion Noncontact 3D digital scanning facilitates a rapid, accurate, and reproducible TLSO fabrication across diverse body types, providing a safer and more efficient alternative to conventional contact plaster-bandage casting.
Objective Transient receptor potential vanilloid 4 (TRPV4), a mechanosensitive ion channel, has been implicated in intervertebral disc homeostasis; however, its role in autophagy regulation remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate whether agonist-induced TRPV4 activation promotes autophagy and extracellular matrix (ECM) synthesis in rat intervertebral discs.
Methods In vitro, rat nucleus pulposus (NP) cells were treated with the TRPV4 agonist (GSK1016790) under normal, serum-deprived, or interleukin-1β-stimulated conditions. Cell viability, intracellular Ca2+ influx, adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase/mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) (AMPK/mTOR) pathway, autophagy, ECM metabolism, apoptosis, and senescence were evaluated. In vivo, TRPV4 agonist was injected into the caudal discs subjected to temporary static compression, and disc changes were assessed by radiography, histomorphology, and immunofluorescence.
Results In vitro, agonist-induced TRPV4 activation rapidly increased intracellular Ca2+ influx and enhanced AMPK phosphorylation. A noncytotoxic concentration of the TRPV4 agonist (10 nM) was selected after dose-response testing. Under the inflammatory stress, TRPV4 agonist enhanced autophagy, promoted ECM synthesis, and suppressed apoptosis and senescence, leading to improved NP cell viability. In vivo, TRPV4 agonist treatment preserved radiographic disc height (p<0.01), reduced histomorphological degeneration (p<0.01), and increased expression of COL2A1, Brachyury, p-AMPK (phosphorylated AMPK), and autophagy markers (p<0.01) compared with controls.
Conclusion These findings demonstrated that TRPV4 activation promotes autophagy and ECM synthesis via the AMPK/mTOR pathway in rat discs and attenuates stress-induced degeneration, suggesting TRPV4 as a potential therapeutic target for disc degeneration.
Objective Spine surgeons are often at risk of radiation exposure due to intraoperative fluoroscopy, leading to health concerns such as carcinogenesis. This is due to the increasing use of percutaneous pedicle screw (PPS) in spinal surgeries, resulting from the widespread adoption of minimally invasive spine stabilization. This study aimed to elucidate the effectiveness of smart glasses (SG) in PPS insertion under fluoroscopy.
Methods SG were used as an alternative screen for fluoroscopic images. Operators A (2-year experience in spine surgery) and B (9-year experience) inserted the PPS into the bilateral L1–5 pedicles of the lumbar model bone under fluoroscopic guidance, repeating this procedure twice with and without SG (groups SG and N-SG, respectively). Each vertebral body’s insertion time, radiation dose, and radiation exposure time were measured, and the deviation in screw trajectories was evaluated.
Results The groups SG and N-SG showed no significant difference in insertion time for the overall procedure and each operator. However, group SG had a significantly shorter radiation exposure time than group N-SG for the overall procedure (109.1 ± 43.5 seconds vs. 150.9 ± 38.7 seconds; p = 0.003) and operator A (100.0 ± 29.0 seconds vs. 157.9 ± 42.8 seconds; p = 0.003). The radiation dose was also significantly lower in group SG than in group N-SG for the overall procedure (1.3 ± 0.6 mGy vs. 1.7 ± 0.5 mGy; p = 0.023) and operator A (1.2 ± 0.4 mGy vs. 1.8 ± 0.5 mGy; p = 0.013). The 2 groups showed no significant difference in screw deviation.
Conclusion The application of SG in fluoroscopic imaging for PPS insertion holds potential as a useful method for reducing radiation exposure.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Exploratory Analysis on Computer-Assisted Smart Spine Surgery using AR/VR Technology through Remote Telesurgery via 5G/6G Adarsh Aithal Poornaprajna International Journal of Basic & Applied Sciences (PIJBAS).2026; : 29. CrossRef
L-Point Entry, Juxtapedicular, and Endplate-Parallel Trajectory (L-JET) Screw Fixation: A Novel Technique in Thoracic Spinal Tumor Surgery Seunghoon Lee, Young Rak Kim, Chang-Hyun Lee, Jungbo Sim, Woojin Kim, Ho Sung Myeong, Hangeul Park, Jun-Hoe Kim, Chi Heon Kim Journal of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery and Technique.2026; 11(1): 6. CrossRef
The impact of augmented reality on radiation exposure during spine surgery: a systematic review Jad El Choueiri, Lorenzo De Rossi, Francesca Pellicanò, Leonardo Di Cosmo, Alberto Rota, Lorenzo Pellegrini, Victor Gabriel El-Hajj, Adrian Elmi-Terander, Donato Creatura, Mario De Robertis, Ali Baram, Carlo Brembilla, Pier Paolo Panciani, Gabriele Capo Neurosurgical Review.2026;[Epub] CrossRef
An innovative 2D optical navigation workflow for percutaneous pedicle screw fixation in thoracolumbar fractures: comparison with O-arm 3D navigation Ren Gao, Kangheng Niu, Le Cheng, Zhong Wei, Xuepeng Wang, Tanjun Wei, Biwang Huang, Feng Xu, Chengjie Xiong Frontiers in Surgery.2026;[Epub] CrossRef
Remote telementoring leads to orthotrauma and orthoplastic surgical plan creation independence during a humanitarian crisis Lewis J. Kaplan, Samir Mehta, Nathan Klingensmith, Patrick J. Brennan, Kierstyn Claycomb, Stephen J. Kovach III, Andrew R. Bauder, Evhen Filonenko, Iarsoalav Radoga, Maisie Savchenko-Fullerton, Günter Germann, L. Scott Levin Orthoplastic Surgery.2026;[Epub] CrossRef
Wearable Devices in Scoliosis Treatment: A Scoping Review of Innovations and Challenges Samira Fazeli Veisari, Shahrbanoo Bidari, Kourosh Barati, Rasha Atlasi, Amin Komeili Bioengineering.2025; 12(7): 696. CrossRef
ROBOTIC-ASSISTED ENDOSCOPIC SURGERY IN LUMBAR SPINE: A TECHNICAL OVERVIEW AND CASE DEMONSTRATION Padungcharn Nivatpumin, Raghad Barri, John Choi Journal of Musculoskeletal Research.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
From the Editor-in-Chief: Featured Articles in the June 2024 Issue Inbo Han Neurospine.2024; 21(2): 373. CrossRef
Commentary on “The Utility and Feasibility of Smart Glasses in Spine Surgery: Minimizing Radiation Exposure During Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Insertion” Wongthawat Liawrungrueang Neurospine.2024; 21(2): 440. CrossRef
Objective To elucidate the patient characteristics and outcomes of emergency surgery for spinal metastases and identify risk factors for emergency surgery.
Methods We prospectively analyzed 216 patients with spinal metastases who underwent palliative surgery from 2015 to 2020. The Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, Barthel index, EuroQol-5 dimension (EQ5D), and neurological function were assessed at surgery and at 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively. Multivariate analysis was performed to identify risk factors for emergency surgery.
Results In total, 146 patients underwent nonemergency surgery and 70 patients underwent emergency surgery within 48 hours of diagnosis of a surgical indication. After propensity score matching, we compared 61 patients each who underwent nonemergency and emergency surgery. Regardless of matching, the median performance status and the mean Barthel index and EQ5D score showed a tendency toward worse outcomes in the emergency than nonemergency group both preoperatively and 1 month postoperatively, although the surgery greatly improved these values in both groups. The median survival time tended to be shorter in the emergency than nonemergency group. The multivariate analysis showed that lesions located at T3–10 (p = 0.002; odds ratio [OR], 2.92; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.48–5.75) and Frankel grades A–C (p < 0.001; OR, 4.91; 95% CI, 2.45–9.86) were independent risk factors for emergency surgery.
Conclusion Among patients with spinal metastases, preoperative and postoperative subjective health values and postoperative survival are poorer in emergency than nonemergency surgery. Close attention to patients with T3–10 metastases is required to avoid poor outcomes after emergency surgery.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Diagnostic errors in spinal metastases: a systematic review of contributing clinical and systemic factors Kyron Wicker, Robert Tran, Robert Ablove European Spine Journal.2026; 35(2): 732. CrossRef
The role of surgical timing in survival of patients with spinal metastases Miklós Kopa, Ádám Kővári, Lukács Németh, János Báskay, Péter Pollner, Zoltán Nagy, Péter Banczerowski, Tamás Mezei International Journal of Clinical Oncology.2026;[Epub] CrossRef
A Tale of 2 Institutions: Differences in Sociodemographic Factors, Presenting Features, Treatment Characteristics, and Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Surgery for Spinal Metastases Hammad A. Khan, Adhith Palla, Kimberly Ashayeri, Lily McLaughlin, David B. Kurland, Anthony Frempong-Boadu, Darryl Lau, Ilya Laufer, Donato Pacione Neurosurgery.2026;[Epub] CrossRef
Health- related quality of life after surgery for spinal metastases Silvia Terzi, Cristiana Griffoni, Simona Rosa, Chiara Cini, Emanuela Asunis, Chiara Alcherigi, Federica Trentin, Stefano Bandiera, Riccardo Ghermandi, Giuseppe Tedesco, Gisberto Evangelisti, Marco Girolami, Valerio Pipola, Giovanni Barbanti Brodano, Aless Journal of Bone Oncology.2025; 52: 100675. CrossRef
Short-Term Outcomes in Planned Versus Unplanned Surgery for Spinal Metastases Ali Haider Bangash, Sertac Kirnaz, Rose Fluss, Victoria Cao, Alexander Alexandrov, Liza Belman, Yaroslav Gelfand, Saikiran G. Murthy, Reza Yassari, Rafael De la Garza Ramos Cancers.2025; 17(14): 2403. CrossRef
One-Year Survival Following Surgical Management of Spinal Metastases Andrey Švec, Martin Bibza, Peter Tisovský, Veronika Boleková, Boris Šteňo Bratislava Medical Journal.2025; 126(12): 3600. CrossRef
From the Editor-in-Chief: Featured Articles in the March 2024 Issue Inbo Han Neurospine.2024; 21(1): 1. CrossRef
Commentary on “Clinical Characteristics, Surgical Outcomes, and Risk Factors for Emergency Surgery in Patients With Spinal Metastases: A Prospective Cohort Study” John H. Chi Neurospine.2024; 21(1): 328. CrossRef
Determinants of Overall and Readmission-Free Survival in Patients with Metastatic Epidural Spinal Cord Compression Mirza Pojskić, Benjamin Saß, Miriam H. A. Bopp, Sebastian Wilke, Christopher Nimsky Cancers.2024; 16(24): 4248. CrossRef
First
Prev
