Objective The American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification has been used to risk stratify surgical candidates. Our study compares outcomes of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS TLIF) procedures based on preoperative ASA physical status classification.
Methods A surgical registry was reviewed for primary, single-level MIS TLIF patients. Patients were categorized by preoperative ASA physical status classification: ASA I, ASA II, ASA III+. Perioperative complications were compared among groups. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for back pain, leg pain, physical function, and disability were recorded preoperatively and at 6-week, 12-week, 6-month, 1-year, and 2-year postoperative timepoints. PROM improvement from baseline (ΔPROM) and minimum clinically important difference (MCID) achievement was calculated for each timepoint and compared among groups. MCID achievement was determined as ΔPROMs that surpassed previously established MCID values.
Results Of the 487 patients, 64 had an ASA classification of I, whereas 336 had an ASA of II, and 87 had an ASA of III or greater. Rates of complications were not associated with ASA classification (all p > 0.050). Neither mean PROM scores nor ΔPROM scores were significantly associated with ASA classification at any timepoint (all p > 0.050). MCID achievement was significantly associated with ASA classification for back pain at 1 year only (p = 0.041). Overall MCID achievement was not significantly associated with ASA classification for any PROM (p > 0.050).
Conclusion While ASA classification has been commonly used to risk stratify surgical candidates for spinal procedures, patients with an ASA of III or greater may be able to achieve similar long-term outcomes following MIS TLIF given proper selection criteria.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Risk Scale to Guide Prophylactic Paraspinous Flap Closure in High-Risk Spine Surgery Allison S. Karwoski, Esther Jung, Kevin Schlidt, Yvonne M. Rasko Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery.2026;[Epub] CrossRef
A Higher American Society of Anesthesiologists Classification Does Not Correlate With Inferior Outcomes Following Cervical Disk Replacement Shriya N. Patel, Sloane O. Ward, Nathaniel S. Cohen, Thomas J. Turinske, Kern Singh Clinical Spine Surgery.2026; 39(6): 304. CrossRef
Baseline American Society of Anesthesiologists classification predicts worse anxiety and pain interference following Lumbar Interbody Fusion John F. Sencaj, Malik A. Siddique, Gregory A. Snigur, Sloane O. Ward, Shriya N. Patel, Kern Singh Journal of Clinical Neuroscience.2025; 131: 110929. CrossRef
Music therapy combined with anesthesia recovery care boosts anesthesia recovery in colorectal cancer patients undergoing laparoscopic radical resection Yan Zheng, Hai-Fang Ni, Yan Shi, Dan-Qian Cui, Zhen-Zhu Wu, Yu-Feng Ling, Shui-Qing He, Xiao-Yun Qin World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
What Are the Risk Factors for Mechanical Failure in Spinal Arthrodesis? An Observational Study Vincenzo Peccerillo, Antonio Culcasi, Riccardo Ruisi, Francesca Amaducci, Maria Grazia Benedetti, Marco Girolami, Andrea Evangelista, Mattia Morri Surgical Techniques Development.2024; 13(1): 87. CrossRef
Efficacy of polidocanol foam sclerotherapy in treatment of patients with advanced hemorrhoids Zhen-Jun Fang, Lin-Xue Wang, Fa Jin World Chinese Journal of Digestology.2024; 32(5): 361. CrossRef
Periotome versus piezotome as an aid for atraumatic extraction: a randomized controlled trial Mohammed Abdullah Alraqibah, Jingade Krishnojirao Dayashankara Rao, Bader Massad Alharbi Journal of the Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.2022; 48(6): 356. CrossRef
First
Prev
