Objective To evaluate early postoperative mobility after lumbar decompression using real-time location system (RTLS)-derived objective metrics and to explore differences in mobility patterns between biportal endoscopic decompression and open decompression.
Methods This retrospective cohort study included 323 patients who underwent lumbar decompression for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis between March 2020 and May 2024. RTLS sensors embedded in wristbands continuously recorded patient mobility during postoperative days (PODs) 1–4. Primary RTLS-derived outcomes included total walking distance, mean walking speed, and active movement ratios (top 20% and top 50%). Between-group comparisons were performed using nonparametric tests. Propensity score matching and multivariable median quantile regression adjusting for age, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status, and preoperative mobility were conducted.
Results RTLS identified differences in early postoperative activity patterns between surgical approaches. In adjusted analyses, activity-intensity–based metrics, particularly the top 20% activity ratio, remained significantly higher in the biportal endoscopic decompression group across multiple PODs. Subgroup analyses demonstrated minimal differences after single-level decompression, whereas activity-based differences were more frequently observed in multilevel procedures.
Conclusion RTLS-based continuous monitoring detected differences in early postoperative activity patterns following lumbar decompression. These findings support the role of RTLS as an objective tool for assessing early functional recovery in spine surgery.
Objective Unilateral biportal endoscopic (UBE) spine surgery is a minimally invasive technique that uses continuous irrigation to improve visualization and control bleeding. Effective water pressure management is crucial for patient safety, particularly at the cervical and thoracic levels where spinal cord injury risk is higher. However, real-time pressure monitoring remains underexplored. This study evaluates the impact of real-time water pressure monitoring on safety during UBE surgery.
Methods A prospective study was conducted involving 20 patients undergoing UBE lumbar spine surgery. Patients were divided into 2 groups based on the irrigation system: gravity-based or infusion pump. Real-time water pressure was monitored using a digital sensor throughout surgery. Each procedure was categorized into 3 phases: phase I, working space preparation; phase II, laminectomy; phase III, flavectomy, dura exposure, and discectomy. Data was analyzed according to the type of irrigation system and surgical phase.
Results The mean water pressure in the surgical field during UBE spine surgery was 17.98± 8.07 mmHg, with no significant differences between surgical phases. However, the infusion pump system maintained significantly lower mean pressure (12.10±3.51 mmHg) compared to the gravity-based system (23.86±6.97 mmHg, p=0.001). The infusion pump system consistently maintained a significantly lower mean water pressure compared to the gravity-based system.
Conclusion Real-time water pressure monitoring during UBE surgery enhances safety by enabling improved control of pressure within the surgical field. Both the gravity-based and infusion pump systems safely maintained working space pressure, with the pump system showing significantly lower pressure levels.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Case Report: Spinal epidural lipomatosis with incomplete cauda equina syndrome treated with unilateral biportal endoscopic technique Zaiyin Deng, Yujin Wang, Mohammed Saud Shaik, Duanyang Li, Rongjing Di, Zhourui Wu, Bin Ma Frontiers in Surgery.2026;[Epub] CrossRef
Epidemiology of spinal cord hypertension syndrome in water-mediated uniportal full endoscopic thoracolumbar surgery: a single-center experience Haiyang Wu, Luyang Wang, Yiping Zheng, Xizhong Zhu, Wanqi Ren, Ziheng Li, Shoule Ma, Mingwang Zhao, Xingchen Li, Yusheng Xu European Spine Journal.2026;[Epub] CrossRef
Controlled versus gravity-based irrigation in endoscopic spine surgery: pressure stability, thresholds, and safety implications Rajendra Singh, Thomas Cha, Alexander Vaccaro, Alan Hilibrand, Gregory Schroeder, Gregory Kepler, Afshin Razi, Mitchell Ng European Spine Journal.2026;[Epub] CrossRef
Sang-Min Park, Kwang-Sup Song, Dae-Woong Ham, Ho-Joong Kim, Min-Seok Kang, Ki-Han You, Choon Keun Park, Dong-Keun Lee, Jin-Sung Kim, Hong-Jae Lee, Hyun-Jin Park
Neurospine 2024;21(4):1190-1198. Published online December 31, 2024
Objective To compare the safety profiles of biportal endoscopic spinal surgery (BESS) and microscopic spinal surgery (MSS) for lumbar disc herniation and spinal stenosis by analyzing the associated adverse events.
Methods We pooled data from 2 prospective randomized controlled trials involving 220 patients (110 in each group) who underwent single-level lumbar surgery. Participants aged 20–80 years with radiating pain due to lumbar disc herniation or spinal stenosis were included in this study. Adverse events were recorded and analyzed over a 12-month follow-up period.
Results The overall adverse event rates were 9.1% (10 of 110) in the BESS group and 17.3% (19 of 110) in the MSS group, which were not statistically significantly different (p=0.133). Notably, wound dehiscence occurred in 8.2% of MSS cases but in none of the BESS cases. Both groups showed similarly low rates of complications, such as dural tears, epidural hematoma, and nerve root injury. The most common adverse event in the BESS group was recurrent disc herniation (2.7%), whereas that in the MSS group was wound dehiscence (8.2%).
Conclusion BESS demonstrated a safety profile comparable to that of MSS for the treatment of lumbar disc herniation and spinal stenosis, with a trend towards fewer overall complications. BESS offers particular advantages in terms of reducing wound-related complications. These findings suggest that BESS is a safe alternative to conventional MSS and potentially offers the benefits of a minimally invasive approach without compromising patient safety.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Editorial: Beyond the Portal Wars—Forging a New Consensus in Endoscopic Spine Surgery Jin-Sung Kim, Piya Chavalparit Global Spine Journal.2026; 16(1): 9. CrossRef
Comparison of paraspinal muscle changes after biportal endoscopic and microscopic lumbar discectomy or decompression Ki-Han You, Sang-Min Park, Daniel Park, Min-Seok Kang, Seung-Yeon Jeong, Sun-Ho Cha, Samuel Cho, Hyun-Jin Park European Spine Journal.2026;[Epub] CrossRef
Improvement in low back pain following endoscopic decompression for spinal stenosis Maria Auron, Yihyun Roh, Maria C. Pedraza Ciro, Win Boonsirikamchai, Yi-Hao Liang, Jung Hoon Kim, Jin-Sung Kim Brain and Spine.2026; 6: 105995. CrossRef
A Systematic Review of Complication Management During Uniportal and Biportal Endoscopic Spine Surgery: Dural Tear and Bleeding Siravich Suvithayasiri, Ju Eun Kim, Facundo Van Isseldyk, Marcus Serra, Christopher Martin, Viswanadha Arunkumar, Sotirios Veranis, Prashanth Rao, Enrico Giordan, Piya Chavalparit, Nelson Astur, Samuel Cho, Jin Sung Kim Global Spine Journal.2026;[Epub] CrossRef
Complications in Minimally Invasive Cervical Spine Surgery–Tubular, Uniportal, and Biportal Endoscopic Surgery (2013–2024) Noah Willett, Chibuikem A. Ikwuegbuenyi, Sean Inzerillo, Eesha Gurav, Mousa Hamad, Ibrahim Hussain, Alan Hernández-Hernández, Galal Elsayed, Osama Kashlan, Roger Härtl Spine.2026; 51(7): E175. CrossRef
Asymptomatic multisegmental epidural hematoma following unilateral biportal endoscopic lumbar decompression: a case report Chun-li Zeng, Jian-cai Zhang, Jin-song Yu, Meng-jun Liu Journal of Medical Case Reports.2026;[Epub] CrossRef
O‐Arm Navigation Enhances Facet Preservation Without Compromising Clinical Outcomes in UBE Decompression for Radiographically Stable Adult Degenerative Scoliosis: A Single‐Center Comparative Study Yi Liu, Yiwei Xie, Zhibao Chen, Ruijun Xu, Haojie Chen, Xiaojian Ye, Jiangming Yu Orthopaedic Surgery.2026; 18(6): 1203. CrossRef
Comparison of outcomes after unilateral biportal endoscopic discectomy versus percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy for lumbar disc herniation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies Abdullah Afridi, Ayesha Zulfiqar, Muhammad Waqar Shahid, Fatima Sajjad, Hamnah Sohail, Fazia Khattak, Sabir Khan, Ayesha Naseem, Alina Batool, Muhammad Muneeb, Savira Khattak, Izhar Ul Haq, Ayesha Shahid, Ayesha Nauman, Marium Nisar, Tanveer Hussain, Ahsa Egyptian Journal of Neurosurgery.2026;[Epub] CrossRef
Functional Outcome of Biportal Endoscopic Spine Surgery Versus Destandau Endoscopic Spine Surgery: A Structured Narrative Review Paresh C Dey, Saurav N Nanda, Saswat Samant, Ashok K Gachhayat, Abhay Tyagi, Sayashi S, Sumit Kaushik Cureus.2026;[Epub] CrossRef
Safety and Utility of Bilateral-contralateral Decompression for Adjacent Segment Stenosis After Lumbar Interbody Fusion Using Unilateral Biportal Endoscopy Dong Hyun Lee, Choon Keun Park, Jae-Won Jang, Dong-Geun Lee Clinical Spine Surgery.2025; 38(10): E488. CrossRef
Far-Lateral Transforaminal Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy for Upper Lumbar Disc Herniations Jin Seop Hwang, Sang Hyub Lee, Dain Jeong, Jae-Won Jang, Yong Eun Cho, Dong-Geun Lee, Choon Keun Park, Chung Kee Chough Neurospine.2025; 22(1): 14. CrossRef
O-arm navigation-based transforaminal unilateral biportal endoscopic discectomy for upper lumbar disc herniation: an innovative preliminary study Dong Hyun Lee, Choon Keun Park, Jin-Sung Kim, Jin Sub Hwang, Jin Young Lee, Dong-Geun Lee, Jae-Won Jang, Jun Yong Kim, Yong-Eun Cho, Dong Chan Lee Asian Spine Journal.2025; 19(2): 194. CrossRef
Analgesic-soaked acellular dermal matrix for postoperative pain control after endoscopic spine surgery: a retrospective chart review Doohun Hyun, Woo Min Park, Jung Hoon Park, Chai Min Yoo, Woo Joo Lee, Shih Min Lee, Cheol Wung Park Journal of Korean Society of Geriatric Neurosurgery.2025; 21(2): 68. CrossRef
Clinical and Radiological Outcomes of Biportal Endoscopic Revision Extraforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Following Previous Central Decompression: A Case Series Seung-Yeon Jeong, Hyun-Jin Park, Jin-Ho Park, Gab-Lae Kim Journal of Advanced Spine Surgery.2025; 15(2): 84. CrossRef
Total facetectomy with/without fusion and facet-preserving microforaminotomy have been performed as conventional surgical treatments for lumbar foraminal stenosis (LFS). Recently, endoscopic spinal surgery has been introduced as a minimally invasive therapeutic modality of LFS by several authors. We report two cases of bilateral LFS at lumbosacral junction level successfully treated with a novel biportal endoscopic spine surgery (BES) technique using primary 2 portals. Two patients presented with chronic onset of back pain and neurogenic claudication symptom. They were diagnosed with bilateral LFS at L5–S1 level from magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography preoperatively. BES for bilateral foraminal decompression was performed via contralateral approach bilaterally without additional skin incision or surgical trajectory by switching surgeon’s position and primary 2 portals. After the surgery, preoperative patients’ back and leg pain resolved and unilateral leg weakness of the 2 patients gradually improved in a few months. Postoperative radiologic images revealed significantly enlarged bilateral foramens at L5–S1 level.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Reaches of Unilateral Biportal Endoscopy in Lower Thoracic and Lumbar Spinal Extramedullary Tumor Resection: Case Series, Surgical Note, and Outcomes Adrian Sanchez-Gomez, Carlos Castillo-Rangel, Gustavo Alberto Vera-Perez, Malcom D. Prestonji, Rodolfo Guerrero-Perez, Gerardo Marín Surgeries.2026; 7(1): 14. CrossRef
Biportal Endoscopic Decompression with Maximized Facet Joint Preservation for Central to Extraforaminal Lumbar Stenosis Sub-Ri Park, Sung-Ryul Choi, Nam-Hoo Kim, Hak-Sun Kim, Ji-Won Kwon, Kyung-Soo Suk, Seong-Hwan Moon, Si-Young Park, Jae-Won Shin, Byung-Ho Lee, Jin-Oh Park Journal of Clinical Medicine.2025; 14(8): 2725. CrossRef
Managing Right-Sided Recurrent Herniation through the Left-Sided Interlaminar Approach Via the Over-the-top Decompression Technique using Unilateral Biportal Endoscopy: Key Techniques and Insights Cheol-Woong Park, Parvez Shamim International Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery.2025; 33(1): 25. CrossRef
Research advances in unilateral endoscopic spinal surgery for the treatment of lumbar disc herniation: a review Nan Fang, Shilin Yan, Aofei Yang Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Clinical and Radiological Outcomes of Biportal Endoscopic Revision Extraforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Following Previous Central Decompression: A Case Series Seung-Yeon Jeong, Hyun-Jin Park, Jin-Ho Park, Gab-Lae Kim Journal of Advanced Spine Surgery.2025; 15(2): 84. CrossRef
Advances and Perspectives in UBE Endoscopic Techniques for the Treatment of Lumbar Spine Related Disorders 迪力·艾尼 阿 Advances in Clinical Medicine.2024; 14(05): 119. CrossRef
Imaging anatomy study related to unilateral biportal endoscopic lumbar spine surgery Shengxuan Hu, Jingwen Zhang, Weibo Zeng, Zhemin Zhu, Shuai Wang, Zhaowei Lin, Benchao Shi European Spine Journal.2024; 33(11): 4368. CrossRef
Treatment of lumbar intervertebral disc herniation using open spinal endoscopy: Techniques and clinical outcomes Bing Yu, Jun Zheng Medicine Advances.2024; 2(2): 186. CrossRef
Comparison of Postoperative Bone Healing in Patients With Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy and Microscopic Lumbar Discectomy Jae-Young So, Jeong-Yoon Park Journal of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery and Technique.2023; 8(Suppl 1): S29. CrossRef
Unilateral biportal endoscopic treatment of complications in a patient with lumbar burst fracture with pedicle screw repositioning and fixation: A case report Guangchao Bai, Jun Wu, Qingfeng Hu Interdisciplinary Neurosurgery.2023; 34: 101837. CrossRef
Global and Current Research Trends of Unilateral Biportal Endoscopy/Biportal Endoscopic Spinal Surgery in the Treatment of Lumbar Degenerative Diseases: A Bibliometric and Visualization Study Pei‐lin Chu, Tao Wang, Jia‐le Zheng, Chong‐qing Xu, Yin‐jie Yan, Qing‐shan Ma, Yin Meng‐chen, Tian Da‐sheng Orthopaedic Surgery.2022; 14(4): 635. CrossRef
Contralateral inclinatory approach for decompression of the lateral recess and same-level foraminal lesions using unilateral biportal endoscopy: A technical report Dasheng Tian, Bin Zhu, Jianjun Liu, Lei Chen, Yisong Sun, Huazhang Zhong, Juehua Jing Frontiers in Surgery.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Dural Injury in Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Spinal Surgery Han Gyu Lee, Moo Sung Kang, So Yeon Kim, Kwang Chun Cho, Young Cheol Na, Jin Mo Cho, Byung Ho Jin Global Spine Journal.2021; 11(6): 845. CrossRef
Unilateral Biportal Endoscopy for Decompression of Extraforaminal Stenosis at the Lumbosacral Junction: Surgical Techniques and Clinical Outcomes Man-Kyu Park, Sang-Kyu Son, Weon Wook Park, Seung-Hyun Choi, Dae Young Jung, Dong Han Kim Neurospine.2021; 18(4): 871. CrossRef
The Biportal Endoscopic Posterior Cervical Inclinatory Foraminotomy for Cervical Radiculopathy: Technical Report and Preliminary Results Kwan-Su Song, Chul-Woo Lee Neurospine.2020; 17(Suppl 1): S145. CrossRef
Current and Future of Endoscopic Spine Surgery: What are the Common Procedures we Have Now and What Lies Ahead? Hyeun Sung Kim, Pang Hung Wu, Il-Tae Jang World Neurosurgery.2020; 140: 642. CrossRef
First
Prev
