Skip to main navigation Skip to main content
  • E-Submission
  • Contact us

NS : Neurospine

OPEN ACCESS
ABOUT
BROWSE ARTICLES
FOR AUTHORS

Page Path

4
results for

"Cervical kyphosis"

Article category

Publication year

Keywords

Authors

"Cervical kyphosis"

Original Article

Deformity

Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:

Include:

Long-term Outcomes of Multilevel Anterior Cervical Osteotomy and Posterior Instrumentation for OPLL-Induced Myelopathy With Cervical Kyphosis
Neurospine. 2025;22(3):623-630.   Published online September 30, 2025
Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:
Include:
Long-term Outcomes of Multilevel Anterior Cervical Osteotomy and Posterior Instrumentation for OPLL-Induced Myelopathy With Cervical Kyphosis
Neurospine. 2025;22(3):623-630.   Published online September 30, 2025
Close
Objective
To analyze long-term clinical and radiological outcomes after multilevel anterior osteotomy with posterior instrumentation in patients with ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL)-induced myelopathy and cervical kyphosis.
Methods
Patients who underwent multilevel anterior osteotomy with posterior instrumentation for OPLL-induced myelopathy and cervical kyphosis and had a minimum of 5-year follow-up were included. Clinical outcomes (Japanese Orthopaedic Association score system for cervical myelopathy [C-JOA], 12-item Short Form health survey [SF-12], Neck Disability Index [NDI]) and radiological parameters (C2–7 lordosis, center of gravity of the head [CGH]-C7 sagittal vertical axis [SVA], T1 slope) were analyzed at the preoperative, immediate postoperative, and latest follow-up timepoints.
Results
Twenty-eight patients were included. The average follow-up period was 66.4 months. All clinical outcome parameters showed significant improvement. C-JOA, SF-12, and NDI showed significant improvement at latest follow-up (p<0.001). C2–7 lordosis increased significantly immediately postoperatively (-6.0°±10.4°) compared to preoperatively (+9.2°±9.6°), and was largely maintained at latest follow-up (-5.7°±9.4°). T1 slope significantly increased between the immediate postoperative timepoint (21.9°±7.7°) and latest follow-up (24.2°±9.5°) (p=0.046). CGH-C7 SVA significantly increased between the immediate postoperative timepoint (22.7±14.8 mm) and latest follow-up (32.2±22.6 mm) (p=0.046).
Conclusion
Multilevel anterior osteotomy with posterior instrumentation is a safe and effective surgical option for OPLL-induced myelopathy with kyphotic cervical alignment. Future studies are required to investigate the forward tilting of cervical spine over time after surgery.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  Crossref logo
  • Radiological Alignment Trajectories and Late Functional Outcomes After Three-Level ACDF: A Single-Center Cohort Study
    Merdan Orunoglu, Ukbe Sirayder, Oguzhan Yilmaz, Murat Baloglu
    Journal of Clinical Medicine.2026; 15(12): 4739.     CrossRef
  • 4,314 View
  • 121 Download
  • 3 Web of Science
  • 1 Crossref

Review Articles

CSRS Special Issue

Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:

Include:

Classification(s) of Cervical Deformity
Neurospine. 2022;19(4):862-867.   Published online December 31, 2022
Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:
Include:
Classification(s) of Cervical Deformity
Neurospine. 2022;19(4):862-867.   Published online December 31, 2022
Close
Cervical spine deformities (CSD) are complex surgical issues with currently heterogenous management strategies. The classification of CSD is still an evolving field. Rudimentary classification schemas were initially proposed in the late 20th century but were largely informal and based on the underlying etiology (i.e. , postsurgical, traumatic, or inflammatory). The first formal classification schema was proposed by Ames et al. in 2015 who established a standard nomenclature for describing these deformities. This classification system established 5 deformity descriptors based on curve apex location (cervical, cervicothoracic, thoracic, craniovertebral junctional, and coronal deformities) and 5 deformity modifiers which helped surgeons utilize a standard language when discussing CSD patients. Koller et al. in 2019 subsequently established a classification system for patients with rigid cervical kyphosis based on regional and global sagittal alignment. Most recently, Kim et al. in 2020 proposed an updated classification system utilizing dynamic cervical spine imaging to guide surgical treatment of CSD patients. It identified 4 major groups of deformities – (1) those with “flat-neck” deformities caused by cervical lordosis T1 slope mismatch; (2) those with focal kyphotic deformities between 2 cervical vertebrae; (3) those with cervicothoracic deformities caused by large T1 slope; and (4) those with coronal deformities. Group 2 deformities most often required combined anterior-posterior approaches with short constructs, and group 3 deformities most often required posterior-only approaches with 3-column osteotomies.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  Crossref logo
  • Current Concepts of Sagittal Alignment in Adult Cervical Deformity
    Zeeshan M. Sardar, Justin L. Reyes, Josephine R. Coury, K. Daniel Riew
    Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.2026; 34(2): e176.     CrossRef
  • Atlantoaxial rotatory fixation
    Peter M. Cirrincione, Jessica H. Heyer
    Current Opinion in Pediatrics.2026; 38(1): 73.     CrossRef
  • Surgical management of congenital C2 over C3 spondyloptosis with severe cervical kyphosis: two case reports
    Shaodong Mo, Yuanquan Chen, Zhen Che, Jing Xu, Rald Groven, Frank Hildebrand, Honglei Yi, Hu Chen, Fuzhi Ai
    European Spine Journal.2026; 35(6): 3612.     CrossRef
  • Multi-Level Uncinatectomies and Posterior Column Osteotomies to Correct a Cervical Kyphotic Deformity: Case Instruction With Intraoperative Picture and Video
    Harsh Jain, Hani Chanbour, Tyler Zeoli, Aaron M. Yengo-Kahn, Scott L. Zuckerman
    Neurosurgery Practice.2026;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Pediatric Syndromic Cervical Kyphosis – Tips and Tricks: A Case-based Review
    Manoj Phalak, Vivek Yadav, Sachin Borkar, Shashank Sharad Kale
    Journal of Spinal Surgery.2026; 13(1): 53.     CrossRef
  • Bibliometric analysis of the top 50 most-cited articles on cervical deformities: a web of science database study
    Julia Diamandi, Amelia Stepniak, Hannah Tetreault, Regan M. Shanahan, Qazi Zeeshan, David T. Fernandes Cabral, Nitin Agarwal, D. Kojo Hamilton
    Spine Deformity.2026; 14(4): 1147.     CrossRef
  • Proposal of a Cervical Sagittal Classification System to Guide Surgical Treatment for Adult Cervical Deformity
    Zeeshan M. Sardar, Roy Miller, Justin L. Reyes, Alexandra C. Dionne, Josephine R. Coury, Fthimnir M. Hassan, Jean-Charles Le Huec, Stephane Bourret, Kazuhiro Hasegawa, Hee Kit Wong, Gabriel Liu, Hwee Weng Dennis Hey, Michael P. Kelly, Lawrence G. Lenke
    Spine.2026; 51(11): 773.     CrossRef
  • A Hard Pill to Swallow: Dysphagia-Associated Factors Following Adult Cervical Deformity Surgery
    Giovanni Cervini, Francesca Totis, Ankita Das, Alekos Theologis, Mohammad Daher, Kyriakos D. Chatzis, Peter Tretiakov, Peter G. Passias
    Journal of Clinical Medicine.2026; 15(14): 5546.     CrossRef
  • Risk factors associated with distal junctional kyphosis and failure after surgical management of adult cervical deformity: a systematic review
    Davin C. Gong, Anthony N. Baumann, Zhaorui Wang, Omkar S. Anaspure, Muhammad Waheed, Evan J. Beck, Rakesh D. Patel, Ilyas S. Aleem
    European Spine Journal.2025; 34(8): 3430.     CrossRef
  • Post-MVC Cervical Kyphosis Deformity Reduction Using Chiropractic BioPhysics Protocols: 1-Year Follow-Up Case Report
    Nicholas J. Smith, Thomas J. Woodham, Miles O. Fortner
    Healthcare.2025; 13(19): 2459.     CrossRef
  • A Narrative Review of Cervical Spinal Deformity
    Srikanth N. Divi, Tyler M. Compton, Daniel E. Herrera, Wellington K. Hsu, Alpesh A. Patel
    Clinical Spine Surgery.2025; 38(9): 393.     CrossRef
  • Reducing Chronic Spine Pain in an Adult Male by Decreasing Lumbar Scoliosis and Increasing Cervical Lordosis Using Chiropractic BioPhysics® Protocols: A 26-Month Follow-Up Case Report
    Jason W Haas, Miles O Fortner, Thomas J Woodham, Deed E Harrison
    Cureus.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Atlantoaxial Instability in the Course of Rheumatoid Arthritis in Relation to Selected Parameters of Sagittal Balance
    Robert Wróblewski, Małgorzata Mańczak, Robert Gasik
    Journal of Clinical Medicine.2024; 13(15): 4441.     CrossRef
  • So Close yet So Far: The impact of undercorrection of cervical sagittal alignment during adult cervical deformity surgery − An Incremental correction analysis
    Ankita Das, Anthony Yung, Oluwatobi Onafowokan, Jamshaid Mir, Max R. Fisher, Tyler K. Williamson, Ethan J. Cottrill, Zorica Buser, Peter S. Tretiakov, Khoi D. Than, Neil V. Shah, Christopher I. Shaffrey, Peter G. Passias
    Journal of Clinical Neuroscience.2024; 130: 110869.     CrossRef
  • Reply to Commentary on “Classification(s) of Cervical Deformity”
    Austin C. Kaidi, Han Jo Kim
    Neurospine.2023; 20(1): 408.     CrossRef
  • Commentary on “Classification(s) of Cervical Deformity”
    Atul Goel
    Neurospine.2023; 20(1): 405.     CrossRef
  • From the Spinopelvic Parameters to Global Alignment and Proportion Scores in Adult Spinal Deformity
    Yongjae Cho, Dae Jean Jo, Seung-Jae Hyun, Jin Hoon Park, Na Rae Yang
    Neurospine.2023; 20(2): 467.     CrossRef
  • Optimizing Surgical Strategy for Cervical Spinal Deformity: Global Alignment and Surgical Targets
    Jae-Koo Lee, Seung-Jae Hyun, Ki-Jeong Kim
    Neurospine.2023; 20(4): 1246.     CrossRef
  • 9,868 View
  • 394 Download
  • 18 Web of Science
  • 18 Crossref

Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:

Include:

Cervical Sagittal Alignment: Literature Review and Future Directions
Neurospine. 2020;17(3):478-496.   Published online September 30, 2020
Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:
Include:
Cervical Sagittal Alignment: Literature Review and Future Directions
Neurospine. 2020;17(3):478-496.   Published online September 30, 2020
Close
Cervical alignment as a concept has come to the forefront for spine deformity research in the last decade. Studies on cervical sagittal alignment started from normative data, and expanded into correlation with global sagittal balance, prognosis of various conditions, outcomes of surgery, definition and classification of cervical deformity, and prediction of targets for ideal cervical reconstruction. Despite the recent robust research efforts, the definition of normal cervical sagittal alignment and cervical spine deformity continues to elude us. Further, many studies continue to view cervical alignment as a continuation of thoracolumbar deformity and do not take into account biomechanical features unique to the cervical spine that may influence cervical alignment, such as the importance of musculature connecting cranium-cervical-thoracic spine and upper extremities. In this article, we aim to summarize the relevant literature on cervical sagittal alignment, discuss key results, and list potential future direction for research using the ‘5W1H’ framework; “WHO” are related?, “WHY” important?, “WHAT” to evaluate and “WHAT” is normal?, “HOW” to evaluate?, “WHEN” to apply sagittal balance?, and “WHERE” to go in the future?

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  Crossref logo
  • Identifying biomechanical and neurophysiological risk factors for postoperative neurologic deterioration in OPLL surgery: A study using ROC curve and path analysis
    Jinyoung Park, Seungjun Ryu, Young Seok Kim, Myungeun Yoo, Hyo Jeong Lee, Chae Hwan Lim, Seok Young Chung, Dawoon Kim, Yong Eun Cho, Yoon Ghil Park
    European Spine Journal.2026; 35(4): 1771.     CrossRef
  • A systematic review and meta-analysis of sagittal cervical spine parameters: Normative values, correlation with quality of life, and biomechanical modeling
    Vinicius Ricieri Ferraz, Carlos R. Goulart, Tobias Alecio Mattei
    North American Spine Society Journal (NASSJ).2026; 25: 100819.     CrossRef
  • A computational study of forward head posture biomechanics
    Katterine N. Rios-Peralta, Afonso J.C. Silva, Ricardo J. Alves-de-Sousa, Kathleen M. Curran, David B. MacManus
    Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials.2026; 175: 107288.     CrossRef
  • Changes in the Cervical Range of Motion and Clinical Outcomes After Laminectomy With Fusion for Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament: Impact of K-Line and OPLL Subtypes
    Zhihao Ma, Yi Huang, Peihong Hou, Hao Li, Mengyuan Zhang, Jiayan Wu, Jinxu Chen, Huawei Liu, Wenhao Hu, Guoquan Zheng
    Neurosurgery.2026; 98(6): 1413.     CrossRef
  • Automated measurement of cervical sagittal and local parameters using a generalizable deep learning model: a multinational development and validation study
    Dong-Ho Kang, Se-Jun Park, Jin-Sung Park, Jaeseok Park, Chong-Suh Lee
    The Spine Journal.2026; 26(6): 1154.     CrossRef
  • A cervical lordosis curvature decline in Chinese asymptomatic populations from 2016 to 2024: a comparative analysis
    Xiang Liu, Wei-cong Zhang, Zhi-hai Su, Yun-chuan Bai, Xiao-jun Lu, Zhen-yan Xu, Li-hsing Chou, Pei-jie Liang, Lian-jun Yang, Hai Lu
    BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders.2026;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Hierarchical deep learning pipeline for robust cervical parameter measurement in radiographs with C7 obscuration
    Dong-Ho Kang, Se-Jun Park, Jin-Sung Park, Hyeonsu Park, Chong-Suh Lee
    npj Digital Medicine.2026;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Cervical curvature measurement using multi-view parametric modeling imaging on reconstructed 3D ultrasound volumes
    Yuchong Gao, Wei Zhang, Jianhao Zhao, Songhan Ge, Yi Mao, Mingbo Zhang, Rui Zheng
    Ultrasonics.2026; 164: 107994.     CrossRef
  • Letter to the editor about the Cervical alignment normative value parameters
    Fabio Zaina, Stefano Negrini
    North American Spine Society Journal (NASSJ).2026; : 100872.     CrossRef
  • Is there a direct correlation between cervical sagittal alignment and spinopelvic sagittal alignment?: an observational study from asymptomatic Indian adults
    Juan Esteban Muñoz Montoya, Karthik Ramachandran, Praveen R Iyer, Ajoy Prasad Shetty, Shanmuganathan Rajasekaran
    Asian Spine Journal.2026; 20(1): 42.     CrossRef
  • A Decision Tree Algorithm to Predict Postoperative Kyphosis After Cervical Laminoplasty for Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy
    Karma Barot, Miguel A. Ruiz-Cardozo, Karan Joseph, Alexander T. Yahanda, Salim Yakdan, Tim Bui, Samuel Brehm, Hana Hallak, Sofia Lopez-Alviar, Michael Ryan Kann, Matthew J. Strok, Gabriel Trevino, Jacob Greenberg, Wilson Z. Ray, Camilo A. Molina
    Operative Neurosurgery.2026;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Reply to the Editor - Epidemiological cervical alignment values versus normative postoperative alignment parameters: methodological differences and clinical implications
    Vinicius Ricieri Ferraz, Tobias A Mattei
    North American Spine Society Journal (NASSJ).2026; : 100878.     CrossRef
  • Normative segmental cervical lordosis distribution and sagittal vertical axis variations with T1 slope: Defining the role of the C2–C5 segment
    Sadegh Bagherzadeh, Srujan Kopparapu, Faramarz Roohollahi, Jay Kumar, Sawyer Bauer, Elliot Neal, Mohammad Hassan A. Noureldine, Elliot Pressman, Puya Alikhani, Mohsen Rostami
    Journal of Craniovertebral Junction and Spine.2026; 17(2): 165.     CrossRef
  • The association between cervical sagittal balance parameters and clinical outcomes after single-level surgery for cervical radiculopathy and/or stenosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Azra Gül, Javier Gomez Farias, Caroline MW. Goedmakers, Rania A. Mekary, Carmen Vleggeert-Lankamp
    Brain and Spine.2026; 6: 106009.     CrossRef
  • Sagittal balance of the cervical spine in adults: a non-systematic literature review
    R. S. Chernyshyov, V. B. Lebedev, B. R. Kinzyagulov, A. A. Zuev
    Russian Journal of Spine Surgery (Khirurgiya Pozvonochnika).2026; 23(1): 92.     CrossRef
  • Finite element analysis of cervicomedullary stress and strain in atlas orthogonal correction using radiographic rotational inputs: A multi-case study
    Jonathan Verderame, Muhammad Shakib Arslan, Farhan Mukhtar, Zaheer Abbas
    Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies.2026; 47: 260.     CrossRef
  • Normative Cervical and Cervicothoracic Sagittal Alignment Parameters for Asymptomatic Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of >35,900 Participants
    Alexandra C. Dionne, Prakash Gorroochurn, Roy Miller, Prerana Katiyar, Samuel Bennion, Lisa Bonsignore-Opp, Josephine R. Coury, Fthimnir M. Hassan, Joseph M. Lombardi, Lawrence G. Lenke, Justin L. Reyes, Zeeshan M. Sardar
    Spine Open.2026;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Investigation of the effects of odontoid bone anatomical location and structure on cervical lordosis angle in cervical ct examinations: A clinical study
    Alemiddin Özdemir, Ahmet Melih Erdoğan, Özge Sevimoğlu, Buket Oğuz, Buse Kaymakcı, Selma Çalışkan, Bülent Bakar
    Medical Journal of Western Black Sea.2026; 10(1): 39.     CrossRef
  • Bibliometric analysis of the top 50 most-cited articles on cervical deformities: a web of science database study
    Julia Diamandi, Amelia Stepniak, Hannah Tetreault, Regan M. Shanahan, Qazi Zeeshan, David T. Fernandes Cabral, Nitin Agarwal, D. Kojo Hamilton
    Spine Deformity.2026; 14(4): 1147.     CrossRef
  • Comparison of cervical alignment between electromagnetic and traction-based head positioning systems
    Jonathan N. Sembrano, Dustin J. Kress, Regan Carlson, Jason J. Haselhuhn, Jacqueline E. Wright, Paul Brian O. Soriano, Kari Odland
    World Neurosurgery: X.2026; 31: 100595.     CrossRef
  • Preoperative cervical curvature and outcomes after uniportal posterior percutaneous endoscopic cervical foraminotomy: a single-center retrospective study
    Kuan-Hung Chen, Tzu-Chiang Peng, Ying-Ching Li, Hong-Kai Wang, Wongthawat Liawrungrueang, KangTaek Lim, Yu-Jen Lu
    Neurosurgical Review.2026;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Three-Dimensional Surface Topography for the Assessment of Spinal Alignment: A Cross-Sectional Study of Biomechanical Correlates
    Brigitte Osser, Csongor Toth, Gyongyi Osser, Laura Ioana Bondar, Liliana-Oana Pobirci, Florin Mihai Marcu, Ramona Nicoleta Suciu, Nicoleta Anamaria Pascalau, Adina Mincic, Corina Dalia Toderescu
    Diagnostics.2026; 16(10): 1445.     CrossRef
  • Preventing distal junctional kyphosis: Choosing a stable end for the lowest-instrumented vertebra is protective following adult cervical deformity surgery
    Pawel P. Jankowski, Paritash Tahmasebpour, Oluwatobi O. Onafowokan, Max R. Fisher, Ethan Cottrill, Caroline M. Wu, Alexander Parsons, Khoi Than, Spencer Matthews, Louis Boissiere, John F. Burke, Peter G. Passias
    Journal of Craniovertebral Junction and Spine.2026; 17(3): 214.     CrossRef
  • Relationship between Preoperative Global Sagittal Alignment and Changes in Cervical Alignment Following Lumbar Pedicle Subtraction Osteotomy
    Bruno Verna, Thomas Caffard, Marco D. Burkhard, Ali E. Guven, Erika Chiapparelli, Anna-Maria Mielke, Artine Arzani, Ranqing Lan, Jennifer Shue, Timo Zippelius, Andrew A. Sama, Federico P. Girardi, Frank P. Cammisa, Alexander P. Hughes
    Spine.2026; 51(13): 910.     CrossRef
  • SpineSense: An Interactive System for Cervical Spine Monitoring and Clinician-Oriented Summaries using COTS Earables EICS005
    Garvit Chugh, Suchetana Chakraborty, Sandip Chakraborty
    Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction.2026; 10(4): 1.     CrossRef
  • Segment-specific versus global cervical paraspinal muscle degeneration predicts sagittal balance and functional recovery after posterior surgery
    Sheyang Xu, Xinglin Liu, Zhiheng Zhao, Sanbao Hu, Xianglong Meng
    BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders.2026;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Sagittal alignment patterns in forward head posture: an EOS-based head-to-pelvis correlation analysis
    Katterine N. Rios-Peralta, Ali Firouzabadi, Kathleen M. Curran, David B. MacManus, Lukas Schönnagel, Matthias Pumberger, Hendrik Schmidt
    BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders.2026;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • The Longitudinal Changes of Cervical Sagittal Alignment in a Non-surgical Cohort: A 12-Year Longitudinal Study
    Xiaoxiong Yang, Wu Haosen, Hanbo Geng, Feifei Zhou
    Global Spine Journal.2026;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Novel AI-Based Algorithm for the Automated Measurement of Cervical Sagittal Balance Parameters. A Validation Study on Pre- and Postoperative Radiographs of 129 Patients
    Sophia Vogt, Carolin Scholl, Priyanka Grover, Julian Marks, Marcel Dreischarf, Ulf-Dietrich Braumann, Patrick Strube, Alexander Hölzl, Sabrina Böhle
    Global Spine Journal.2025; 15(2): 1155.     CrossRef
  • Recent Global Trends and Hotspots in Occipitocervical Fusion: A Bibliometric Analysis and Visualization Study
    Anna Gorbacheva, Clifford Pierre, Julius Gerstmeyer, Donald David Davis, Bryan G. Anderson, Tara Heffernan, Luke Jouppi, Zeyad Daher, Arash Tabesh, Stephen Lockey, Amir Abdul-Jabbar, Rod Oskouian, Jens R. Chapman
    World Neurosurgery.2025; 193: 1008.     CrossRef
  • Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Versus Cervical Corpectomy With Iliac Crest Graft and Fusion in Multilevel Degenerative Myelopathy
    Claudio A. Rivas Palacios, Mario M. Barbosa, María A. Escobar, Ezequiel Garcia-Ballestas, Camilo García, Salvador M. Mattar, Salvador Mattar
    Clinical Spine Surgery.2025; 38(10): 475.     CrossRef
  • Comparison of sagittal measurements of cervical spine in spondylosis patients between Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Radiograph
    Maria Nicolet, Priyanka -, Rajagopal Kadavigere, Shailesh S Nayak, Saikiran Pendem, Surbhi Gupta Aggarwal, Tancia Pires, Varsha R
    F1000Research.2025; 14: 45.     CrossRef
  • The influence of body posture on cervical alignment measured in the sagittal plane on conventional radiographs: a systematic review
    Esther van Santbrink, Valérie Schuermans, Ank van de Goor, Rob de Bie, Toon Boselie, Henk van Santbrink, Anouk Smeets
    The Spine Journal.2025; 25(8): 1751.     CrossRef
  • Surgical Treatment of Chronic Infectious Cervicothoracic Spondylitis
    Denis G. Naumov, Sergey G. Tkach, Gamzat B. Aliev, Arkadiy A. Vishnevskiy, Petr K. Yablonskiy
    Traumatology and Orthopedics of Russia.2025; 31(1): 43.     CrossRef
  • Cervical manipulation accelerates recovery and further correction of cervical alignment in mechanical neck pain (MNP) patients with neck exercise: A randomized controlled trial
    Ke Wu, Rongrong Deng, Xu Zhao, Zihan Wang, Qingyuan Ru, Xin Chen, Botao Zhang, Liping Chen, Ran Kang
    Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice.2025; 59: 101969.     CrossRef
  • Validity and Reliability of an Artificial Intelligence-Based Posture Estimation Software for Measuring Cervical and Lower-Limb Alignment Versus Radiographic Imaging
    Sung Cheol Park, Sanghee Lee, Jisoo Yoon, Chi-Hyun Choi, Chan Yoon, Yong-Chan Ha
    Diagnostics.2025; 15(11): 1340.     CrossRef
  • A Commentary on “Proximal Thoracic Alignment Change Influences Cervical Sagittal Alignment After Correction Surgery in Patients With Lenke Type 2 Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis”
    Seung Woo Suh
    Neurospine.2025; 22(2): 364.     CrossRef
  • Risk factors associated with distal junctional kyphosis and failure after surgical management of adult cervical deformity: a systematic review
    Davin C. Gong, Anthony N. Baumann, Zhaorui Wang, Omkar S. Anaspure, Muhammad Waheed, Evan J. Beck, Rakesh D. Patel, Ilyas S. Aleem
    European Spine Journal.2025; 34(8): 3430.     CrossRef
  • Determining the Reference Values of the Measurements of Cervical Sagittal Alignment Using the Extrapolated Norms Method
    Shenyan Gu, Kaiwen Chen, Dongqing Zhu, Feizhou Lyu, Jianyuan Jiang, Joe F. Jabre, Xinlei Xia, Chaojun Zheng
    World Neurosurgery.2025; 200: 124227.     CrossRef
  • Influence of destructive changes and surgical correction on the parameters of sagittal balance of the cervical spine in children
    D. A. Glukhov, A. Yu. Mushkin
    Russian Journal of Spine Surgery (Khirurgiya Pozvonochnika).2025; 22(2): 66.     CrossRef
  • Documenting Cervical Spine Injuries Following Negative MRI Findings: Clinical and Medico-Legal Overview of Dynamic Imaging
    Leonard F Vernon, Adam Benn
    Cureus.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Analysis of the mutual influence of cervical sagittal balance parameters in children in norm and with Down syndrome
    A. A. Kuleshov, A. G. Nazarenko, V. A. Sharov, M. S. Vetrile, A. V. Ovsyankin, E. S. Kuzminova
    Russian Journal of Spine Surgery (Khirurgiya Pozvonochnika).2025; 22(2): 55.     CrossRef
  • Influence of subaxial cervical spine surgery on the sagittal alignment of the cervical and global spine. A prospective observational study
    M. Bolcha, J. Lodin, D. Cihlář, M. Sameš, P. Vachata
    Brain and Spine.2025; 5: 104373.     CrossRef
  • Influence of Preoperative Cervical Spine Curvature in Postoperative Radiographic Outcomes Following Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: A Single-Center Retrospective Study
    Ashwin Ghadiyaram, Asha Krishnakumar, Andrew K Schwieder, Thérèse F Weidenkopf, Hayden M Dux, Jefferson O Abaricia, Charles F Opalak, Robert S Graham, William C Broaddus
    Cureus.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Odontoid parameters in subjects with and without degenerative cervical spondylosis
    Tao Kang, Weiyou Chen, Longao Huang, Hongyuan Xu, Hua Jiang
    BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Understanding Radiographic Parameters in Cervical Deformity
    Max Fisher, Oluwatobi O. Onafowokan, Kyriakos Chatzis, Peter Tretiakov, Peter G. Passias
    Clinical Spine Surgery.2025; 38(9): 404.     CrossRef
  • Postoperative sagittal alignment measurements independently predict clinical outcomes after anterior cervical discectomy with anterior or circumferential fusion
    Daniele Armocida, Giuseppa Zancana, Antonio Sportelli, Fabio Cofano, Diego Garbossa, Alessandro Frati
    World Neurosurgery: X.2025; 28: 100515.     CrossRef
  • Cervical Muscle Composition in Degenerative Dropped Head Syndrome
    Thomas Caffard, Bruno Verna, Lukas Schönnagel, Ali E. Guven, Artine Arzani, Erika Chiapparelli, Marco D. Burkhard, Ranqing Lan, Jennifer Shue, Angela Rosenbohm, Jan Kassubek, Oliver Dobrindt, Andrew A. Sama, Federico P. Girardi, Frank P. Cammisa, Timo Zip
    Spine.2025; 50(19): 1303.     CrossRef
  • Cervical Sagittal Alignment Revisited on the Path to Personalized Spine Surgery: A Big Picture Perspective Through Bibliometric Analysis and Visualization
    Luke L. Jouppi, Clifford Pierre, Anna Gorbacheva, Julius Gerstmeyer, Colin Gold, Cameron Hogsett, Nicholas Minissale, Mark Kraemer, Stephen Lockey, Amir Abdul-Jabbar, Rod J. Oskouian, Jens R. Chapman
    World Neurosurgery.2025; 202: 124387.     CrossRef
  • Comparison of Radiography with Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Measurement of Cervical Lordosis
    Ismail Ertan Sevin, Selin Bozdag, Efecan Erisken, Hasan Kamil Sucu
    Medicina.2025; 61(9): 1654.     CrossRef
  • The effect of cervical parameters on interlaminar epidural steroid injection treatment outcomes in patients with cervical disc herniation
    Serdar Kokar, Ridvan Isik, Rekib Sacaklidir, Savas Sencan, Osman Hakan Gunduz
    Turkish Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation.2025; 71(3): 351.     CrossRef
  • Cervical sagittal alignment and its impact on degenerative cervical myelopathy outcomes
    Granit Molliqaj, Alexandre Lavé, Michele Da Broi, Leonardo Anselmi, Aria Nouri, Pierre-Pascal Girod, Renato Gondar, Karl Schaller, Enrico Tessitore
    Brain and Spine.2025; 5: 105862.     CrossRef
  • Functional recovery after laminoplasty versus staged anterior–posterior fusion for multilevel cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament
    Jae-Won Shin, Kyung-Soo Suk, Hak-Sun Kim, Seong-Hwan Moon, Si-Young Park, Byung-Ho Lee, Ji-Won Kwon
    Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Evaluating intraoperative C2 slope as a radiographic guide for cervical deformity correction
    Namhoo Kim, Kyung-Soo Suk, Ji-Won Kwon, Sub-Ri Park, Jae Won Shin, Byung Ho Lee, Si-Young Park, Jin-Oh Park, Seong-Hwan Moon, Hak-Sun Kim
    Scientific Reports.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Impact of C3 Laminectomy Versus C3 Laminoplasty on Cervical Alignment
    Shyam J. Kurian, Elyette Lugo, Sang Hun Lee, Hamid Hassanzadeh, Lee H. Riley, Khaled M. Kebaish, David B. Cohen, Amit Jain
    Clinical Spine Surgery.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Postural and spinal stability analysis for different floor sitting styles
    Seung Nam Min, Murali Subramaniyam, Mohammad Parnianpour, Dong Joon Kim
    Heliyon.2024; 10(17): e37379.     CrossRef
  • Do key measurement parameters derived from specific cervical vertebral segments differ between lordotic and non-lordotic cervical spine alignments? A study of asymptomatic young adults
    Lee Daffin, Max C. Stuelcken
    Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies.2024; 37: 115.     CrossRef
  • Comparison of Cervical Sagittal Parameters among Patients with Neck Pain and Patients with Cervical Spondylotic Radiculopathy and Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy
    Tao Liu, Shuo Tian, Jianzhou Zhang, Mengzi He, Longlian Deng, Wenyuan Ding, Zheng Wang, Dalong Yang
    Orthopaedic Surgery.2024; 16(2): 329.     CrossRef
  • Usefulness of the preoperative thoracic inlet angle in comparison to the T1 slope for predicting cervical kyphosis after laminoplasty
    Kenta Takakura, Eiji Takasawa, Tokue Mieda, Toshiki Tsukui, Kazuhiro Inomata, Yusuke Tomomatsu, Akira Honda, Hirotaka Chikuda
    European Spine Journal.2024; 33(3): 1179.     CrossRef
  • Current Concepts of Cervical Spine Alignment, Sagittal Deformity, and Cervical Spine Surgery
    Hidenori Suzuki, Masahiro Funaba, Kazuhiro Fujimoto, Yusuke Ichihara, Norihiro Nishida, Takashi Sakai
    Journal of Clinical Medicine.2024; 13(5): 1196.     CrossRef
  • Halo vest fixation effectively maintains cervical alignment through intraoperative repositioning in patients with cervical spine instability
    Takafumi Arita, Osamu Kawano, Hiroaki Sakai, Yuichiro Morishita, Muneaki Masuda, Tetsuo Hayashi, Kensuke Kubota, Takeshi Maeda, Yasuharu Nakashima, Kazuya Yokota
    Heliyon.2024; 10(6): e27952.     CrossRef
  • Association Between Cervical Sagittal Alignment and Subaxial Paraspinal Muscle Parameters
    Thomas Caffard, Artine Arzani, Bruno Verna, Vidushi Tripathi, Erika Chiapparelli, Samuel J. Medina, Lukas Schönnagel, Soji Tani, Gaston Camino-Willhuber, Krizia Amoroso, Ali E. Guven, Jiaqi Zhu, Ek Tsoon Tan, John A. Carrino, Jennifer Shue, Hassan Awan Ma
    Spine.2024; 49(9): 621.     CrossRef
  • Comparison of radiological and clinical outcomes of cervical laminoplasty versus lateral mass screw fixation in patients with ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament
    Tao Liu, Jianzhou Zhang, Longlian Deng, Mengzi He, Shuo Tian, Wenyuan Ding, Zheng Wang, Dalong Yang
    BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • How does cervical sagittal profile change after the spontaneous compensation of global sagittal imbalance following one- or two-level lumbar fusion
    Chengxin Liu, Weiguo Zhu, Yongjin Li, Xiangyu Li, Bin Shi, Chao Kong, Shibao Lu
    BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Research of Global Tilt and Functional Independence: Insights into Spinal Health of Older Women
    Yu-Chieh Chiu, Ping-Chiao Tsai, Ssu-Hsien Lee, Wen-Tien Wu, Tzai-Chiu Yu, Ru-Ping Lee, Ing-Ho Chen, Jen-Hung Wang, Kuang-Ting Yeh
    Bioengineering.2024; 11(5): 493.     CrossRef
  • The Radiological Characteristics of Degenerative Cervical Kyphosis with Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy
    Hongwei Wang, Haocheng Xu, Xianghe Wang, Ye Tian, Jianwei Wu, Xiaosheng Ma, Feizhou Lyu, Jianyuan Jiang, Hongli Wang
    Spine Surgery and Related Research.2024; 8(3): 272.     CrossRef
  • Post-Laminectomy Kyphosis in a Case of Tuberculosis of the Cervical Spine: A Case Report and Literature Review
    V. Selvin Prabhakar, Tosaddeque Hussain, Christopher Gerber, Anindya Basu
    Journal of Korean Society of Spine Surgery.2024; 31(2): 65.     CrossRef
  • Imaging Characteristics of Nonrheumatoid Arthritis Patients With Retro-odontoid Pseudotumor
    Soya Kawabata, Kohei Kuroshima, Koki Kawaguchi, Norihiko Takegami, Takashi Yurube, Takehiro Michikawa, Koji Akeda, Kenichiro Kakutani, Nobuyuki Fujita
    Spine.2024; 49(19): E315.     CrossRef
  • Automatic 3D pelvimetry framework in CT images and its validation
    Junlin Shao, Qian Wu, Yuqian Zhang, Changqi Liu, Xing Huo, Changqing Wang
    Scientific Reports.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Preoperative Factors on Loss of Range of Motion after Posterior Cervical Foraminotomy
    Dong-Ho Lee, Hyung Rae Lee, Sang Yun Seok, Ji Uk Choi, Jae Min Park, Jae-Hyuk Yang
    Medicina.2024; 60(9): 1496.     CrossRef
  • Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion for the Treatment of Pincer Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: A Single-Center Retrospective Study
    Xinyu Zhang, Baogan Peng, Zengbiao Ma, Bing Wu, Chunyu Liu, Yongchao Li
    World Neurosurgery.2024; 191: e772.     CrossRef
  • Impact of Gender-Specific Physiological activities on Bone Density and Spinal Alignment Post-Spinal Stabilization Surgery Affecting Quality of Life
    Duygu Baykal, Mehmet Ziya Çetiner
    American Journal of Health Behavior.2024; 48(4): 1125.     CrossRef
  • Introducing Angle B: A Novel Quantitative Approach for Sagittal Alignment Reduction in Atlanto-Axial Dislocation Surgery
    Shengyu Cui, Xinyu Wang, Kang Li, Hailong Feng, Zhenlei Liu, Fengzeng Jian, Kai Wang
    Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management.2024; Volume 20: 789.     CrossRef
  • Comparison of Open Microscopic and Biportal Endoscopic Approaches in Multi-Level Posterior Cervical Foraminotomy: Radiological and Clinical Outcomes
    Hyung Rae Lee, Jae Min Park, In-Hee Kim, Jun-Hyun Kim, Jae-Hyuk Yang
    Journal of Clinical Medicine.2024; 14(1): 164.     CrossRef
  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging Is Inadequate to Assess Cervical Sagittal Alignment Parameters
    Brian C. Goh, Harry M. Lightsey, Wylie Y. Lopez, Daniel G. Tobert, Harold A. Fogel, Thomas D. Cha, Joseph H. Schwab, Christopher M. Bono, Stuart H. Hershman
    Clinical Spine Surgery.2023; 36(2): E70.     CrossRef
  • Clinical significance of the C2 slope after multilevel cervical spine fusion
    Namhoo Kim, Kyung-Soo Suk, Ji-Won Kwon, Joonoh Seo, Hunjin Ju, Byung Ho Lee, Seong-Hwan Moon, Hak-Sun Kim, Hwan-Mo Lee
    Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine.2023; 38(1): 24.     CrossRef
  • Changes in intervertebral sagittal alignment of the cervical spine from supine to upright
    Anthony A. Oyekan, Clarissa M. LeVasseur, Jeremy D. Shaw, William F. Donaldson, Joon Y. Lee, William J. Anderst
    Journal of Orthopaedic Research.2023; 41(7): 1538.     CrossRef
  • Loss of cervical sagittal alignment worsens the cervical spinal lesions in patients with Hirayama disease
    Kaiwen Chen, Yang Yang, Chi Sun, Yu Zhu, Hongli Wang, Feizhou Lyu, Jianyuan Jiang, Chaojun Zheng
    Neurological Sciences.2023; 44(6): 2103.     CrossRef
  • Cervical kinematic change after posterior full-endoscopic cervical foraminotomy for disc herniation or foraminal stenosis
    Seungyoon Paik, Yunhee Choi, Chun Kee Chung, Young Il Won, Sung Bae Park, Seung Heon Yang, Chang-Hyun Lee, John Min Rhee, Kyoung-Tae Kim, Chi Heon Kim, Thamer Hamdan
    PLOS ONE.2023; 18(2): e0281926.     CrossRef
  • Cervical sagittal balance after consecutive three-level hybrid surgery versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: radiological results from a single-center experience
    Shihao Chen, Yuxiao Deng, Hao Liu, Tingkui Wu, Kangkang Huang, Junbo He, Beiyu Wang
    Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Factors related to T1 slope: spinopelvic balance and thoracic compensation
    Chengxin Liu, Yongjin Li, Xiangyu Li, Bin Shi, Shibao Lu
    BMC Surgery.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Variation of cervical sagittal alignment parameters according to age and pelvic incidence in degenerative spinal deformity patients
    Vincent Lamas, Renan Chapon, Solène Prost, Benjamin Blondel, Stéphane Fuentes, Erik André Sauleau, Yann Philippe Charles
    European Spine Journal.2023; 32(10): 3624.     CrossRef
  • Effect of T1 Slope on Disappearance of Cervical Lordosis after Posterior Cervical Double-Door Laminoplasty Based on Medical Informatics
    Yulin Zhao, Binglei Zhang, Baisheng Yuan
    Brain Sciences.2023; 13(8): 1189.     CrossRef
  • Analysis of sagittal parameters for easier and more accurate determination of cervical spine alignment
    Byeong Ho Oh, Jee Yong Kim, Jong Beom Lee, Il Sup Kim, Jae Taek Hong, Jae Hoon Sung, Ho Jin Lee
    Medicine.2023; 102(41): e35511.     CrossRef
  • A Novel Intraoperative Posture‐Adjustment Apparatus for Correction of Cervical Lordosis in Anterior Cervical Surgery
    Yifei Deng, Beiyu Wang, Hao Liu, Yang Meng, Xin Rong, Tingkui Wu, Hao Chen, Ying Hong
    Orthopaedic Surgery.2023; 15(12): 3162.     CrossRef
  • A novel rapid measurement method of cervical sagittal parameters based on the integrated inclinometer of a smartphone: a validity and reliability study
    Tianji Huang, Chunyang Zhang, Zhenghan Han, Weiyang Zhong, Zenghui Zhao, Yong Zhu, Xiaoji Luo, Jie Zhang
    Annals of Medicine.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Optimizing Surgical Strategy for Cervical Spinal Deformity: Global Alignment and Surgical Targets
    Jae-Koo Lee, Seung-Jae Hyun, Ki-Jeong Kim
    Neurospine.2023; 20(4): 1246.     CrossRef
  • Variation of cervical sagittal alignment parameters according to gender, pelvic incidence and age
    Yann Philippe Charles, Solène Prost, Sébastien Pesenti, Brice Ilharreborde, Eloïse Bauduin, Féthi Laouissat, Guillaume Riouallon, Stéphane Wolff, Vincent Challier, Ibrahim Obeid, Louis Boissière, Emmanuelle Ferrero, Federico Solla, Jean-Charles Le Huec, S
    European Spine Journal.2022; 31(5): 1228.     CrossRef
  • What is the most accurate substitute for an invisible T1 slope in cervical radiographs? A comparative study of a novel method with previously reported substitutes
    Brian J. Park, Colin J. Gold, Royce W. Woodroffe, Satoshi Yamaguchi
    Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine.2022; 36(5): 815.     CrossRef
  • Spinopelvic measurements of sagittal balance with deep learning: systematic review and critical evaluation
    Tomaž Vrtovec, Bulat Ibragimov
    European Spine Journal.2022; 31(8): 2031.     CrossRef
  • Pediatric Spine Trauma
    Sungjae An, Seung-Jae Hyun
    Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society.2022; 65(3): 361.     CrossRef
  • Reciprocal Changes in the Whole-Body Following Realignment Surgery in Adult Spinal Deformity
    Jae-Koo Lee, Seung-Jae Hyun, Ki-Jeong Kim
    Asian Spine Journal.2022; 16(6): 958.     CrossRef
  • Odontoid Incidence: A Novel Cervical Parameter Influencing Cervical Alignment From Top to Bottom
    Jae-Koo Lee, Seung-Jae Hyun, Ki-Jeong Kim
    Neurospine.2022; 19(2): 463.     CrossRef
  • Cervical Alignment Analysis Comparing Two-Level Cervical Disc Arthroplasty with Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion with Anterior Plate Fixation
    Adewale A. Bakare, John Paul G. Kolcun, Ali Z. Piracha, Jonah R. Moss, Ryan Khanna, John E. O’Toole, Harel Deutsch, Vincent C. Traynelis, Richard G. Fessler
    World Neurosurgery.2022; 165: e597.     CrossRef
  • Does the asymmetry and extension function of the preoperative cervical paraspinal extensor predict postoperative cervical sagittal deformity in patients who undergo modified laminoplasty?
    Sibo Lin, Taotao Lin, Zhengru Wu, Gang Chen, Zhitao Shangguan, Zhenyu Wang, Wenge Liu
    The Spine Journal.2022; 22(12): 1953.     CrossRef
  • Validity and reliability of a novel iPhone method to rapidly measure cervical sagittal parameters
    Jie Zhang, Chunyang Zhang, Weiyang Zhong, Zenghui Zhao, Fei Han, Zhenghan Han, Hang Zhang, Tianji Huang, Xiaoji Luo
    Scientific Reports.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Changes in T1 slope and cervical sagittal vertical axis correlate to improved neurological function recovery after cervical laminoplasty
    Dong-Fan Wang, Xiang-Yu Li, Chao Kong, Cheng-Xin Liu, Bin Shi, Shi-Bao Lu
    Frontiers in Surgery.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Total disc replacement alters the biomechanics of cervical spine based on sagittal cervical alignment
    Muzammil Mumtaz, Justin Mendoza, Sudharshan Tripathi, Amey Kelkar, Norihiro Nishida, Ashish Sahai, Vijay K. Goel
    Journal of Craniovertebral Junction and Spine.2022; 13(3): 278.     CrossRef
  • Comparison of 3-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion and open-door laminoplasty in cervical sagittal balance: A retrospective study
    Wenhao Wang, Yixue Huang, Zhikai Wu, Xiayu Hu, Pan Xiang, Hao Liu, Huilin Yang
    Frontiers in Surgery.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Progression of Ossification of Posterior Longitudinal Ligament After Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion in Military Patients Exposed to Minor Trauma
    Jungmyung Koo, SungHwan Hwang, Sang Hoon Yoon, Hyung Jin Shin, Byung-Kyu Cho
    Korean Journal of Neurotrauma.2022; 18(2): 254.     CrossRef
  • Predictable factors for aggravation of cervical alignment after posterior cervical foraminotomy
    Hyung Rae Lee, Dong-Ho Lee, Sang Yun Seok, Woon Sang Lee, Minsoo Kim, Jae Hwan Cho, Chang Ju Hwang, Choon Sung Lee
    Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine.2022; : 1.     CrossRef
  • Crossing the Cervicothoracic Junction
    Justin W. Vickery, Emil E. Varas, Amir M. Abtahi
    Clinical Spine Surgery.2022; 35(10): 451.     CrossRef
  • Sagittal balance of the cervical spine in children older than 4 years: what is the norm?
    D. A. Glukhov, V. I. Zorin, Ya. A. Maltseva, A. Yu. Mushkin
    Hirurgiâ pozvonočnika (Spine Surgery).2022; 19(4): 19.     CrossRef
  • Clinical Impact and Correlations of Odontoid Parameters Following Multilevel Posterior Cervical Fusion Surgery
    Jae-Koo Lee, Seung-Jae Hyun, Seung Heon Yang, Ki-Jeong Kim
    Neurospine.2022; 19(4): 912.     CrossRef
  • Surgical Strategies and Perioperative Considerations for Cervical Deformity With Cerebral Palsy: A Comprehensive Review of the Literature
    Hyung Cheol Kim, Sung Han Oh, Jae Keun Oh, Yoon Ha
    Neurospine.2022; 19(4): 868.     CrossRef
  • Commentary on “Clinical Impact and Correlations of Odontoid Parameters Following Multilevel Posterior Cervical Fusion Surgery”
    Sang Hun Lee
    Neurospine.2022; 19(4): 921.     CrossRef
  • Kinematics after cervical laminoplasty: risk factors for cervical kyphotic deformity after laminoplasty
    Bum-Joon Kim, Sung-Min Cho, Junseok W Hur, Jaehyung Cha, Se-Hoon Kim
    The Spine Journal.2021; 21(11): 1822.     CrossRef
  • Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Treated by Posterior Spinal Segmental Instrumented Fusion : When Is Fusion to L3 Stable?
    Seung-Jae Hyun, Lawrence G. Lenke, Yongjung Kim, Keith H. Bridwell, Meghan Cerpa, Kathy M. Blanke
    Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society.2021; 64(5): 776.     CrossRef
  • The state of the sagittal balance of the injured cervical spine depending on the nature of the damage to the subaxial level
    O.S. Nekhlopochyn, V.V. Verbov
    TRAUMA.2021; 22(3): 48.     CrossRef
  • Cervical Sagittal Imbalance after Cervical Laminoplasty in Elderly Patients
    Hyun Woong Mun, Chang Duk Yuk, Tae Hwan Kim, Moon Soo Park, Seok Woo Kim, Ji Hee Kim, Jun Hyong Ahn, In Bok Chang, Joon Ho Song, Jae Keun Oh, Andrea Lovato
    BioMed Research International.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • 25,215 View
  • 1,015 Download
  • 97 Web of Science
  • 110 Crossref

Clinical Article

Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:

Include:

Stand-Alone Cages for Anterior Cervical Fusion: Are There No Problems?
Korean J Spine. 2016;13(1):13-19.   Published online March 31, 2016
Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:
Include:
Stand-Alone Cages for Anterior Cervical Fusion: Are There No Problems?
Korean J Spine. 2016;13(1):13-19.   Published online March 31, 2016
Close
Objective

There are complications in stand-alone cage assisted anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF), such as cage subsidence and kyphosis. Here we report our clinical result on ACDF, comparing with stand-alone cages and with cervical plate system for degenerative cervical spine diseases.

Methods

Patients with degenerative cervical disease who were diagnosed and treated in Konyang University Hospital between January 2004 and December 2014 were included in this study. Patients who had operation in single level ACDF were selected. Patients scored the degree of pain using visual analog scale before and after the surgery. Subsidence was defined as ≥3-mm decrease of the segmental height, and cervical kyphosis was defined as progression of ≥5° at 12 months after postoperative follow-up compared to that measured at the immediate postoperative period.

Results

A total of 81 patients were enrolled for this study. Forty-five patients were included in a cervical plate group and the others were in stand-alone cage group. There was no statistical difference in pain score between the 2 groups. Segmental subsidence was observed in 7 patients (15.6%) in plate-assisted cervical fusion group, and 13 patients (36.1%) in stand-alone cage group. Segmental kyphosis was observed in 4 patients (8.9%) in plate-assisted cervical fusion group, and 10 patients (27.8%) in stand-alone cage group. There was statistical difference between the 2 groups.

Conclusion

There was no difference in pain between 2 groups. But stand-alone case group showed higher incidence rate than plate-assisted cervical fusion group in segmental subsidence and cervical kyphosis. When designing cervical fusion, more attention should be given selecting the surgical technique.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  Crossref logo
  • Level specific hounsfield unit thresholds as a predictor of subsidence following transforaminal and posterior lumbar interbody fusion
    Mina Girgis, Frank L. Vazquez, Alex Tang, Arpitha Pamula, Russell G. Strom, Tan Chen
    Journal of Orthopaedic Reports.2026; 5(3): 100764.     CrossRef
  • Reoperation Risk Between Plated and Stand-Alone Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion
    Ehsan Tabaraee, Heather A. Prentice, Jessica E. Harris, Verain Mahajan, Ravinder Bains, Alem Yacob, Calvin C. Kuo, Allen L. Ho, Elizabeth P. Norheim, Omid R. Hariri, Kern H. Guppy
    Spine.2026; 51(3): 170.     CrossRef
  • Outcome and complications after two-level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion (ACDF) with or without plating. A propensity matched cohort study
    Jenny Kornberg, Kristian Høy, Mikkel Østerheden Andersen, Casper Friis Pedersen, Leah Y. Carreon
    Brain and Spine.2026; 6: 105961.     CrossRef
  • Comparison between plate cage system and stand-alone cage in the treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy patients with cervical kyphosis: clinical and radiographic outcomes
    Chao Wang, Shu Liu, Jiabin Yuan, Zhicai Shi
    Frontiers in Surgery.2026;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Evaluation of a Novel Flexible Cage System for C5–C6 Fixation: A Finite Element Study Against Conventional ACDF Implants
    Seongho Woo, Won Mo Koo, Kinam Park, Jong-Moon Hwang, Sungwook Kang
    Bioengineering.2026; 13(4): 375.     CrossRef
  • Perioperative management of antithrombotic therapy in elderly patients undergoing elective ACDF: implementation and outcomes of a standardized institutional protocol
    Giuseppe Corazzelli, Davide De Los Rios, Gennaro De Rosa, Francesco Fiore, Sergio Corvino, Settimio Leonetti, Francesco Ricciardi, Paolo Di Russo, Nicola Gorgoglione, Valentina Pizzuti, Alessandro D’Elia, Marco Santilli, Fulvio Aloj, Antonio Bocchetti, Ra
    European Spine Journal.2026; 35(9): 5650.     CrossRef
  • “Standalone Cage With Integrated Screw Fixation Versus Cage-Plate Fixation in Unilateral Cervical Facet Dislocations”
    Anil Kumar, Bhaskar Sarkar, Aman Verma, Dhaval Patel, Kaustubh Ahuja, Pankaj Kandwal
    Clinical Spine Surgery.2026;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Construct length rather than interbody spacer material is associated with reoperation after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion
    Hershil Patel, Sapan Patel, Karli Funk, Matthew O’Hara, Evan Honig, Usman Zareef, Ryan Curto, Husni Alasadi, Ryan Smith, Tyler Pease, Phelan Shea, Joshua Olexa, Alexander Padovano, Daniel Cavanaugh, Eugene Koh, Charles Sansur, Steven Ludwig, Julio Jauregu
    European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology.2026;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Perioperative antithrombotic management in degenerative spine surgery: a multicenter cohort of 767 consecutive patients
    Giuseppe Corazzelli, Sergio Corvino, Davide De Los Rios, Diego Gentile, Chiara Di Domenico, Francesco Corazzelli, Gennaro De Rosa, Francesco Fiore, Cristiana Germano, Marco Filippelli, Niccolò Colella, Francesco Ricciardi, Alessandro D’Elia, Settimio Leon
    Frontiers in Medicine.2026;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Comparing Outcomes between Cage Alone and Plate Fixation in Single-Level Anterior Cervical Fusion: A Retrospective Clinical Series
    Jae-Won Shin, Han-Bin Jin, Yung Park, Joong-Won Ha, Hak-Sun Kim, Kyung-Soo Suk, Sung-Hwan Moon, Si-Young Park, Byung-Ho Lee, Ji-Won Kwon, In-Uk Kim
    Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery.2025; 17(3): 417.     CrossRef
  • Assessing Surgical Outcomes for Cage Plate System versus Stand-Alone Cage in Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Elias Elias, Ali Daoud, Justin Smith, Charbel Elias, Zeina Nasser
    World Neurosurgery.2024; 185: 150.     CrossRef
  • The Role of Osteobiologics in Augmenting Spine Fusion in Unplated Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Compared to Plated Constructs: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Gianluca Vadalà, Luca Ambrosio, Sergio De Salvatore, Daniel K. Riew, S. Tim Yoon, Jeffrey C. Wang, Hans Jörg Meisel, Zorica Buser, Vincenzo Denaro
    Global Spine Journal.2024; 14(2_suppl): 43.     CrossRef
  • A systematic review of risk factors and adverse outcomes associated with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion surgery over the past decade
    Vikramaditya Rai, Vipin Sharma, Mukesh Kumar, Lokesh Thakur
    Journal of Craniovertebral Junction and Spine.2024; 15(2): 141.     CrossRef
  • SOP Ventrale Stabilisierung der subaxialen HWS
    Jonathan Neuhoff, Alexander Wengert, Philipp Schleicher, Andreas Pingel, Frank Kandziora
    Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie up2date.2024; 19(05): 429.     CrossRef
  • Factors influencing cage subsidence in anterior cervical corpectomy and discectomy: a systematic review
    Utpal Kanti Dhar, Emma Lilly Menzer, Maohua Lin, Vivian Hagerty, Timothy O’Connor, Chi-Tay Tsai, Frank D. Vrionis
    European Spine Journal.2023; 32(3): 957.     CrossRef
  • Comparing the Effectiveness and Safety of Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion with Four Different Fixation Systems: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis
    Jin Xiao, Hui Yu, Jianfeng Sun, Yuxuan Deng, Yang Zhao, Rui Gao, Xian Li
    Open Medicine Journal.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes for Patients with Cervical Adjacent Segment Disease Treated with Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion with Integrated Interbody Spacers
    Saif E. Zaidi, Vishal Venkatraman, David A.W. Sykes, Jessica Albanese, Melissa M. Erickson, Clifford L. Crutcher, C. Rory Goodwin, Michael W. Groff, Peter Grossi, Khoi D. Than, Michael M. Haglund, Muhammad M. Abd-El-Barr
    World Neurosurgery.2023; 180: e514.     CrossRef
  • Reverse Lumbar Pedicle Screw in Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion: A Novel Concept to Restrict Cage Subsidence
    Jinyue He, Fei Luo, Qing Fang, Jianzhong Xu, Zehua Zhang
    Orthopaedic Surgery.2023; 15(12): 3193.     CrossRef
  • Standalone cage versus anchored cage for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a comparative analysis of clinical and radiological outcomes
    Niharika Virkar, Pramod Bhilare, Shailesh Hadgaonkar, Ajay Kothari, Parag Sancheti, Siddharth Aiyer
    International Orthopaedics.2022; 46(10): 2339.     CrossRef
  • Stand-alone anterior cervical decompression and fusion surgery: A cohort study evaluating a shaped cage without plates or screws
    Xiaolong Chen, Alisha Sial, Charmian Stewart, Jose Vargas Castillo, Ashish D. Diwan
    Frontiers in Surgery.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • A critical review on the biomechanical study of cervical interbody fusion cage
    Huiwen Huang, Jinglong Liu, Lizhen Wang, Yubo Fan
    Medicine in Novel Technology and Devices.2021; 11: 100070.     CrossRef
  • Comparison of stand-alone cage and cage-with-plate for monosegmental cervical fusion and impact of virtual reality in evaluating surgical results
    Samer Zawy Alsofy, Makoto Nakamura, Christian Ewelt, Konstantinos Kafchitsas, Thomas Fortmann, Stephanie Schipmann, Eric Suero Molina, Heinz Welzel Saravia, Ralf Stroop
    Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery.2020; 191: 105685.     CrossRef
  • Incidence of Subsidence of Seven Intervertebral Devices in Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: A Network Meta-Analysis
    Jietao Xu, Yi He, Yawei Li, Guo-Hua Lv, Yu-Liang Dai, Bin Jiang, Zhenzhong Zheng, Bing Wang
    World Neurosurgery.2020; 141: 479.     CrossRef
  • Does zero-profile anchored cage accompanied by a higher postoperative subsidence compared with cage-plate construct? A meta-analysis
    Yingjie Lu, Yuepeng Fang, Xu Shen, Dongdong Lu, Liyu Zhou, Minfeng Gan, Xuesong Zhu
    Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Feasibility of Posterior Cervical Foraminotomy for Adjacent Segmental Disease after Anterior Cervical Fusion
    Hyun Jun Kim, Min Soo Kang, Sang Ho Lee, Chan Hong Park, Seok Won Chung, Yong Hwan Shin, Shin Young Lee, Eun Soo Park
    Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society.2020; 63(6): 767.     CrossRef
  • STAND-ALONE CERVICAL CAGE FOR CERVICAL RADICULOPATHY: A RETROSPECTIVE STUDY
    I Ketut Martiana, Reyner Valiant Tumbelaka
    (JOINTS) Journal Orthopaedi and Traumatology Surabaya.2020; 9(1): 17.     CrossRef
  • Pseudarthrosis in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with a self-locking, stand-alone cage filled with hydroxyapatite: a retrospective study with clinical and radiological outcomes of 98 levels with a minimum 2-year follow-up
    Eduardo A. Iunes, Enrico A. Barletta, Telmo A. B. Belsuzarri, Franz J. Onishi, André Y. Aihara, Sergio Cavalheiro, Andrei F. Joaquim
    Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine.2020; 33(6): 717.     CrossRef
  • Comparison of Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion With a Stand-Alone Interbody Cage Versus a Conventional Cage-Plate Technique: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Zoe B. Cheung, Sunder Gidumal, Samuel White, John Shin, Kevin Phan, Nebiyu Osman, Rachel Bronheim, Luilly Vargas, Jun S. Kim, Samuel K. Cho
    Global Spine Journal.2019; 9(4): 446.     CrossRef
  • Stand-Alone Cervical Cages in 2-Level Anterior Interbody Fusion in Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: Results from a Minimum 2-Year Follow-up
    Eugene Pak-Lin Ng, Andrew Siu-Leung Yip, Keith Hay-Man Wan, Michael Siu-Hei Tse, Kam-Kwong Wong, Tik-Koon Kwok, Wing-Cheung Wong
    Asian Spine Journal.2019; 13(2): 225.     CrossRef
  • Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Cervical Anterior Fusion and Cervical Artificial Disc Replacement in the Korean Medical System
    Hyosang Lee, Ui Chul Kim, Jae Keun Oh, Taehyun Kim, Sohee Park, Yoon Ha
    Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society.2019; 62(1): 83.     CrossRef
  • Minimally invasive fusion in patients with multilevel cervical spinal stenosis: case report and literature review
    K. T. Meskhi, B. N. Vorona
    Voprosy neirokhirurgii imeni N.N. Burdenko.2019; 83(2): 109.     CrossRef
  • Locking Stand-Alone Cage Constructs for the Treatment of Cervical Spine Degenerative Disease
    Roberto Alfonso De Leo–Vargas, Ildefonso Muñoz–Romero, Michel Gustavo Mondragón–Soto, Jaime Jesús Martínez–Anda
    Asian Spine Journal.2019; 13(4): 630.     CrossRef
  • Comparison of Adjacent Segment Degeneration, Cervical Alignment, and Clinical Outcomes After One- and Multilevel Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion
    Jun Jae Shin
    Neurospine.2019; 16(3): 589.     CrossRef
  • A Clinical Comparison of Anterior Cervical Plates Versus Stand-Alone Intervertebral Fusion Devices for Single-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Procedures
    Ripul R. Panchal, Kee D. Kim, Robert Eastlack, John Lopez, Andrew Clavenna, Daina M. Brooks, Gita Joshua
    World Neurosurgery.2017; 99: 630.     CrossRef
  • Biomechanical Stability Analysis of a Stand‐alone Cage, Static and Rotational‐dynamic Plate in a Two‐level Cervical Fusion Construct
    Parmenion P Tsitsopoulos, Leonard I Voronov, Michael R Zindrick, Gerard Carandang, Robert M Havey, Alexander J Ghanayem, Avinash G Patwardhan
    Orthopaedic Surgery.2017; 9(3): 290.     CrossRef
  • A Prospective Study with Cage-Only or Cage-with-Plate Fixation in Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Interbody Fusion of One and Two Levels
    Sam Yeol Kim, Seung Hwan Yoon, Dokeun Kim, Chang Hyun Oh, Seyang Oh
    Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society.2017; 60(6): 691.     CrossRef
  • 19,223 View
  • 198 Download
  • 36 Crossref