Objective To determine the clinical impact of the baseline sagittal imbalance severity in patients with adult spinal deformity (ASD).
Methods We retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent ≥ 5-level fusion including the pelvis, for ASD with a ≥ 2-year follow-up. Using the Scoliosis Research Society-Schwab classification system, patients were classified into 3 groups according to the severity of the preoperative sagittal imbalance: mild, moderate, and severe. Postoperative clinical and radiographic results were compared among the 3 groups.
Results A total of 259 patients were finally included. There were 42, 62, and 155 patients in the mild, moderate, and severe groups, respectively. The perioperative surgical burden was greatest in the severe group. Postoperatively, this group also showed the largest pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis mismatch, suggesting a tendency towards undercorrection. No statistically significant differences were observed in proximal junctional kyphosis, proximal junctional failure, or rod fractures among the groups. Visual analogue scale for back pain and Scoliosis Research Society-22 scores were similar across groups. However, severe group’s last follow-up Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores significantly lower than those of the severe group.
Conclusion Patients with severe sagittal imbalance were treated with more invasive surgical methods along with increased the perioperative surgical burden. All patients exhibited significant radiological and clinical improvements after surgery. However, regarding ODI, the severe group demonstrated slightly worse clinical outcomes than the other groups, probably due to relatively higher proportion of undercorrection. Therefore, more rigorous correction is necessary to achieve optimal sagittal alignment specifically in patients with severe baseline sagittal imbalance.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Radiographic and clinical predictors of surgical outcomes following endoscopic decompression for radiculopathy in adult degenerative scoliosis: A multi-center retrospective study Mounica Paturu, Joshua Woo, Kosuke Saguira, David Huie, Christoph Hofstetter, Muhammad M. Abd-el-Barr Brain and Spine.2026; 6: 105990. CrossRef
Does Preoperative Spinal Alignment Influence Surgical Outcomes When Postoperative Alignment and Fixation Strategies Are Matched in ASD Correction? Donghua Huang, Zhan Wang, Michael Jian-Wen Chen, Annika Bay, Robert N. Uzzo, Gabrielle Dykhouse, Atahan Durbas, Andrea Pezzi, Stephane Owusu-Sarpong, Luis Felipe Colon, Kasra Araghi, Quante Singleton, Farah Musharbash, Sereen Halayqeh, Matthew E. Cunningh Spine.2026; 51(11): 761. CrossRef
Balance or Strength? Reconsidering Muscle Metrics in Sagittal Malalignment in Adult Sagittal Deformity Patients Donghua Huang, Zhan Wang, Mihir Dekhne, Atahan Durbas, Tejas Subramanian, Gabrielle Dykhouse, Robert N. Uzzo, Luis Felipe Colón, Stephane Owusu-Sarpong, Han Jo Kim, Francis Lovecchio Journal of Clinical Medicine.2025; 14(10): 3293. CrossRef
The predictive value of the global alignment and proportion (GAP) score for mechanical complications following adult spinal deformity surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis Vinicius Ricieri Ferraz, Guilherme Santos Piedade, Carlos R. Goulart, Maria Fernanda Ricieri Ferraz Franco de Souza, Marcelo Ochoa Coelho de Souza Furlan, Philippe A. Mercier, Tobias A. Mattei North American Spine Society Journal (NASSJ).2025; 24: 100816. CrossRef
Objective Osteotomies are required for the mobilization of spinal segments in patients with revisional scoliosis surgery with a fusion mass; however, only a few techniques have shown efficacy and safety, and their mid- and long-term outcomes remain unelucidated. This study aimed to analyze long-term outcomes of the posterior multilevel crack osteotomy (PMCO) technique for revisional surgery for scoliosis with a fusion mass.
Methods Data from 18 patients who underwent revisional scoliosis surgery using PMCO between 2009 and 2015 and had more than 5-year follow-up were retrospectively reviewed. The Cobb angle and coronal and sagittal balance parameters were examined preoperatively, postoperatively, and during the final follow-up. Perioperative parameters and complications were also assessed.
Results Preoperative and postoperative Cobb angles were 60.5° and 29.9°, respectively (p < 0.001); this improvement was maintained until the final follow-up (33.4°, p = 0.058). The difference in preoperative and postoperative coronal balance was statistically significant (15.9 mm and 9.2 mm, respectively; p < 0.001); this was maintained until the final follow-up (p = 0.071). There was no change in sagittal balance parameters over the 3 measurement periods. Only 1 patient showed PMCO-related motor weakness, but he spontaneously recovered 3 months after postsurgery. Pseudarthrosis was not observed during the follow-up period.
Conclusion Incomplete osteotomy using PMCO provided satisfactory deformity correction without severe complications during revisional surgery for scoliosis with a fusion mass. It may be a less invasive procedure that maintains cortical continuity, preserves soft tissues, and provides sufficient mobility for the correction of spinal segments.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Reduced Bone Density Based on Hounsfield Units After Long-Segment Spinal Fusion with Harrington Rods Alexander Swart, Abdelrahman M. Hamouda, Zach Pennington, Anthony L. Mikula, Michael Martini, Nikita Lakomkin, Mahnoor Shafi, Ahmad N. Nassr, Arjun S. Sebastian, Jeremy L. Fogelson, Brett A. Freedman, Benjamin D. Elder World Neurosurgery.2024; 185: e509. CrossRef
Objective It remains unclear whether cervical sagittal deformity (CSD) should be defined by radiographic parameters alone versus both clinical and radiographic factors, and whether radiographic malalignment by itself warrants a CSD corrective surgery in patients who present primarily with neurologic symptoms.
Methods We administered a survey to a group of expert surgeons to evaluate whether radiographic parameters alone were sufficient to diagnose CSD, and in which scenarios surgeons recommend a CSD realignment procedure versus addressing the neurologic symptoms alone.
Results No single radiographic criteria reached a 50% threshold as being sufficient to establish the diagnosis of CSD. When asymptomatic radiographic malalignment was present, a sagittal deformity correction was more likely to be recommended in patients with myelopathy versus those with radiculopathy alone. The majority of surgeons recommended deformity correction when symptoms of cervical deformity were present in addition to radiographic malalignment (85% with deformity symptoms and radiculopathy, 93% with deformity symptoms and myelopathy).
Conclusion There is no consensus on which radiographic and/or clinical criteria are necessary to define the presence of CSD. We recommend that symptoms of cervical deformity, in addition to radiographic parameters, be considered when deciding whether to perform deformity correction in patients who present primarily with myelopathy or radiculopathy.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Current Concepts of Sagittal Alignment in Adult Cervical Deformity Zeeshan M. Sardar, Justin L. Reyes, Josephine R. Coury, K. Daniel Riew Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.2026; 34(2): e176. CrossRef
C2–C7 sagittal alignment on lateral cervical X-rays and its correlation with neck pain, disability, and neurological symptoms Hoon Sub Han, Won Kyu Kim, Yong Seok Nam Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation.2026;[Epub] CrossRef
Analysis of the factors associated with sexual health improvement in patients who underwent surgical management for adult spine deformity David van Schaik, Alice Baroncini, Louis Boissiere, Daniel Larrieu, Lisa Goudman, Javier Pizones, Ferrán Pellise, Ahmet Alanay, Frank Kleinstück, Anouar Bourghli, Ibrahim Obeid European Spine Journal.2025; 34(5): 1801. CrossRef
Risk factors associated with distal junctional kyphosis and failure after surgical management of adult cervical deformity: a systematic review Davin C. Gong, Anthony N. Baumann, Zhaorui Wang, Omkar S. Anaspure, Muhammad Waheed, Evan J. Beck, Rakesh D. Patel, Ilyas S. Aleem European Spine Journal.2025; 34(8): 3430. CrossRef
Reducing Chronic Spine Pain in an Adult Male by Decreasing Lumbar Scoliosis and Increasing Cervical Lordosis Using Chiropractic BioPhysics® Protocols: A 26-Month Follow-Up Case Report Jason W Haas, Miles O Fortner, Thomas J Woodham, Deed E Harrison Cureus.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
From the Spinopelvic Parameters to Global Alignment and Proportion Scores in Adult Spinal Deformity Yongjae Cho, Dae Jean Jo, Seung-Jae Hyun, Jin Hoon Park, Na Rae Yang Neurospine.2023; 20(2): 467. CrossRef
Development and Validation of an Online Calculator to Predict Proximal Junctional Kyphosis After Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery Using Machine Learning Chang-Hyun Lee, Dae-Jean Jo, Jae Keun Oh, Seung-Jae Hyun, Jin Hoon Park, Kyung Hyun Kim, Jun Seok Bae, Bong Ju Moon, Chang-Kyu Lee, Myoung Hoon Shin, Hyun Jun Jang, Moon-Soo Han, Chi Heon Kim, Chun Kee Chung, Seung-Myung Moon Neurospine.2023; 20(4): 1272. CrossRef
First
Prev
