Tomoyuki Asada, Eric R. Zhao, Adin M. Ehrlich, Adrian Lui, Andrea Pezzi, Sereen Halayqeh, Tarek Harhash, Olivia C. Tuma, Kasra Araghi, Todd J. Albert, James Farmer, Russel C. Huang, Harvinder Sandhu, Han Jo Kim, Francis C. Lovecchio, James E. Dowdell, Sravisht Iyer, Sheeraz A. Qureshi
Neurospine 2025;22(1):3-13. Published online March 31, 2025
Objective While minimally invasive-transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) has shown superiority in key clinical metrics over the open approach, evidence regarding patient-reported outcomes remains limited. This study compared postoperative recovery trajectories and symptomatic improvement phases between MIS and open TLIF.
Methods This retrospective review included patients who underwent single-level MIS or open TLIF. Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) for back and leg pain were collected preoperatively and postoperatively. Segmented regression analysis with mixed-effects modeling, allowing for identification of distinct recovery phases, compared symptomatic trends between approaches.
Results Of 324 patients (268 MIS, 56 open), baseline demographics were similar except for greater preoperative leg pain in the MIS group (NRS: 6.0 vs. 5.0, p = 0.027). A segmented regression model identified 4 ODI recovery phases: postoperative disability phase (PDP, day 0 to 13), early improvement phase (day 13 to 28), late improvement phase (day 28 to 110), and plateau phase (later than day 110). The MIS group exhibited significantly lower disability exacerbation during PDP (β = 0.93 vs. 1.42 points per day, p = 0.008). Additionally, the plateau of NRS back occurred significantly earlier in the MIS group than in the open group (MIS, 26.7 ± 2.6 days vs. open, 51.7 ± 6.6 days, p < 0.001).
Conclusion MIS-TLIF resulted in lower postoperative disability during the first 2 weeks compared to the open approach. Furthermore, low back pain achieved an earlier plateau in back pain by about 4 weeks in the MIS approach.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Multifidus Muscle Atrophy Predicts Spinal Cage Subsidence After Lumbar Fusion Cong Zhang, Chengming Li, Xiaotao Wu, Xiaozhi Sun Journal of Pain Research.2026; Volume 19: 1. CrossRef
Biomaterials and Noncoding RNA: The “Repair‐Alliance” Perspective in Intervertebral Disc Degeneration Chen Liu, Zhengguang Li, Yongbo Zhang, Tianyi Ji, Hua Sun, Gen Wei, Liang Zhang, Juqun Xi Advanced Healthcare Materials.2026;[Epub] CrossRef
Modified Integrated Health State Suggests Lower Cumulative Neck Pain–Related Disability After Cervical Disk Replacement Compared With Anterior Cervical Diskectomy and Fusion Tomoyuki Asada, Adin M. Ehrlich, Sereen Halayqeh, Eric R. Zhao, Adrian T. H. Lui, Andrea Pezzi, Austin C. Kaidi, Kasra Araghi, Vishaal Nayagam, Roger Freeman, Olivia C. Tuma, Tarek Harhash, Harvinder S. Sandhu, Todd J. Albert, Han Jo Kim, James C. Farmer, Neurosurgery.2026;[Epub] CrossRef
Efficacy of low-dose Escherichia coli-derived recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion Tae Hoon Kang, Jeongwoon Han, Minjoon Cho, Jae Hyup Lee European Spine Journal.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Ishan Khosla, Fatima N. Anwar, Andrea M. Roca, Srinath S. Medakkar, Alexandra C. Loya, Aayush Kaul, Jacob C. Wolf, Vincent P. Federico, Arash J. Sayari, Gregory D. Lopez, Kern Singh
Neurospine 2024;21(1):253-260. Published online January 31, 2024
Objective To evaluate preoperative disability’s influence on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) following surgery for degenerative spondylolisthesis (DS).
Methods DS patients who underwent surgical intervention were retrospectively identified from a single-surgeon spine registry. Cohorts based on Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) < 41 (milder disability) and ≥ 41 (severe disability) were created. Demographic differences were accounted for with 1:1 propensity score matching. For the matched sample, perioperative and PRO data were additionally collected. PROs assessed included mental health, physical function, pain, and disability. Pre- and up to 2-year postoperative PROs were utilized. Average time to final follow-up was 15.7 ± 8.8 months. Improvements in PROs and minimal clinically important difference (MCID) rates were calculated. Continuous variables were compared through Student t-test and categorical variables were compared through chi-square tests.
Results Altogether, 214 patients were included with 77 in the milder disability group. The severe disability group had worse postoperative day (POD) 1 pain scores and longer hospital stays (p ≤ 0.038, both). The severe disability group reported worse outcomes pre- and postoperatively (p < 0.011, all), but had greater average improvement in 12-item Short Form health survey mental composite score (SF-12 MCS), 9-Item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), visual analogue scale (VAS)-back, and ODI by 6 weeks (p ≤ 0.037, all) and PHQ-9, VAS-back and ODI by final follow-up (p ≤ 0.015, all). The severe disability cohort was more likely to achieve MCID for SF-12 MCS, PHQ-9, and ODI (p ≤ 0.003, all).
Conclusion Patients with greater baseline disability report higher POD 1 pain and discharge later than patients with milder disability. While these patients report inferior physical/mental health before and after surgery, they report greater improvements in mental health and disability postoperatively.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Surgical Site Infection After Primary Posterior Lumbar Fusion Increases the Risk of New-Onset Mental Health Disorders: Matthew H. Meade, Omar Sbaih, Hunter Smith, Nithin Gupta, Mark Miller, Ruchir Nanavati, William DiCiurcio, Hikmat Chmait, Mitchell Ng, Gregory Schroeder, Christopher Kepler, Barrett Woods, Andrew P. White Spine Open.2026;[Epub] CrossRef
Passive recharge burst spinal cord stimulation for the treatment of refractory nonsurgical low back pain: 24-month results from a prospective randomized controlled trial and predictors of success James J Yue, Steven Falowski, Edward Tavel, Robert Heros, Anne Christopher, Denis Patterson, Robert Funk, Ibrahim Mohab, Sayed Wahezi, Jacqueline Weisbein, Christopher J Gilligan, Ajay Antony, Michael Fishell, Jessica Jameson, Chi Lim, Nathan Miller, Derr North American Spine Society Journal (NASSJ).2026; 27: 100911. CrossRef
Analysis of preoperative and postoperative depression and anxiety in patients with lumbar disc herniation with radiculopathy treated with percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy Yatao Wei, Hailun Huang, Kui Sun, Heng Gao, Zhenwen Cao, Bin Zhang, Junzhe Wu, Yongai Liu Frontiers in Psychiatry.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Objective The lumbar fusion is an important surgery for the orthopedic diseases. The rehabilitation might improve the outcome of patients with lumbar fusion surgery. The rehabilitation-related effects can be revealed by a systemic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials (RCTs). The purpose of this study is to clarify the rehabilitation effects in the patients with lumbar fusion surgery.
Methods We performed a systematic search and a meta-analysis for the RCT of rehabilitation treatment on the patients with lumbar fusion surgery. The comparison between rehabilitation treatment (including psychological rehabilitation, exercise, and multimodal rehabilitation) and typical treatment was performed to find if the rehabilitation treatment can improve the outcome after the lumbar fusion surgery. Fifteen studies of lumbar fusion patients under rehabilitation treatment and typical treatment were enrolled in a variety of rehabilitation modalities. The focused outcome was the rehabilitation-related effects on the fear, disability, and pain of patients after the lumbar fusion surgery.
Results Five hundred twenty-eight rehabilitation subjects and 498 controls were enrolled. The psychological-related rehabilitation showed a significant decrease in pain-related fear when compared to usual treatment. The multimodal rehabilitation can improve the disability outcome to a greater extent when compared to usual treatment. The multimodal rehabilitation seemed to have a more significantly positive effect to decrease disability after lumbar fusion surgery. In addition, the exercise and multimodal rehabilitation can relieve the pain after lumbar fusion surgery. The exercise rehabilitation seemed to have a more significantly positive effect to relieve pain after lumbar fusion surgery.
Conclusion The rehabilitation might relieve the pain-related fear, disability, and pain after lumbar fusion surgery.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Posterior-only versus combined anterior–posterior approaches for thoracolumbar burst fractures: a meta-analysis Marc Boutros, Guy Awad, Shaza Hammad, Reina Khatib, Zina Smadi, Chahine Assi European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology.2026;[Epub] CrossRef
Fear of movement in patients after lumbar spine fusion and an analysis of factors: a cross-sectional study Yingyan Pan, Qiong Qi, Chao Yang, Meng Dai, Huihui Zhang, Jie Wen, Hailing Qiu Frontiers in Neurology.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Early functional training is not superior to routine rehabilitation in improving walking distance and multifidus atrophy after lumbar fusion: a randomized controlled trial with 6-month follow-up Hongyuan Lu, Yanqing Shen, Quanwei Shao, Zheng Huang, Yanjun Cao, Jianqing Su, Fei Li, Weiyi Xiong, Wenyao Li, Kunpeng Li, Wei Feng European Spine Journal.2025; 34(6): 2453. CrossRef
Pain outcomes following long-segment thoracolumbar fusion: a three-year mixed-effects analysis Ishav Y. Shukla, Faraaz Azam, William H. Hicks, Kristen Hall, Omar S. Akbik, Carlos A. Bagley Neurosurgical Review.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Early and midterm efficacy of oxiplex gel on postoperative pain intensity, physical disability, and musculoskeletal power in patients undergoing lumbar discectomy Alireza Tabibkhooei, Maziar Azar, Mohsen Nabiuni, Javad Jahandideh, Mohsen Benam, Farid Qoorchi Moheb Seraj, Feizollah Ebrahimnia, Ali Moradi Egyptian Journal of Neurosurgery.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Relationships Between Skeletal Muscle Mass, Lumbar Lordosis, and Chronic Low Back Pain in the Elderly Myung Woo Park, Sang Jun Park, Sun Gun Chung Neurospine.2023; 20(3): 959. CrossRef
Objective A post hoc subgroup analysis of prospectively collected data from a randomized controlled trial was conducted to identify risk factors related to poor outcomes in patients who underwent minimally invasive discectomy.
Methods Patients were divided into satisfied and dissatisfied subgroups based on Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), visual analogue scale (VAS) back pain score (VAS-back) and leg pain score (VAS-leg) at short-term and midterm follow-up according to the patient acceptable symptom state threshold. Demographic characteristics, radiographic parameters, and clinical outcomes between the satisfied and dissatisfied subgroups were compared using univariate and multivariate analysis.
Results A total of 222 patients (92.1%) completed 2-year follow-up, and the postoperative ODI, VAS-back, and VAS-leg were significantly improved after surgery as compared to preoperatively. Multivariate analysis indicated older age (p = 0.026), lateral recess stenosis (p = 0.046), and lower baseline ODI (p = 0.027) were related to poor short-term functional improvement. Higher baseline VAS-back (p = 0.048) was associated with poor short-term relief of back pain, while absence of decreased sensation (p = 0.019) and far-lateral disc herniation (p = 0.004) were associated with poorer short-term relief of leg pain. Lumbar facet joint osteoarthritis was identified as a risk factor for poor functional improvement (p = 0.003) and relief of back pain (p = 0.031). Disc protrusion (p = 0.036) predicted poorer relief of back pain at midterm follow-up.
Conclusion In this study, several factors were identified to be predictive of poor surgical outcomes following minimally invasive discectomy. (ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT01997086).
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Incidence and Predictors of Oral Steroid Use Shortly Following Lumbar Microdiscectomy Henry Avetisian, Will Karakash, David McCavitt, Bahador Athari, Marc A. Abdou, Dil Patel, Jeffrey C. Wang, Raymond J. Hah, Ram K. Alluri Spine.2026; 51(6): 412. CrossRef
Ten-Year Heterogeneity of Minimal Important Change and Patient Acceptable Symptom State After Lumbar Fusions Leevi A. Toivonen, Jenna L.C. Laurén, Hannu Kautiainen, Arja H. Häkkinen, Marko H. Neva Spine.2025; 50(1): 46. CrossRef
Unilateral biportal endoscopic discectomy versus percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy in the treatment of far-lateral lumbar disc herniation Haiyang Qiao, Haijun Ma, Mingkui Shen, Zhongxin Tang, Jun Tan Neurosurgical Review.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Development and validation of a nomogram to predict the risk of residual low back pain after tubular microdiskectomy of lumbar disk herniation Fengzhao Zhu, Dongqing Jia, Yaqing Zhang, Chencheng Feng, Yan Peng, Ya Ning, Xue Leng, Jianmin Li, Yue Zhou, Changqing Li, Bo Huang European Spine Journal.2024; 33(6): 2179. CrossRef
Influence of Preoperative Disability on Clinical Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion James W. Nie, Timothy J. Hartman, Omolabake O. Oyetayo, Eileen Zheng, Keith R. MacGregor, Dustin H. Massel, Arash J. Sayari, Kern Singh World Neurosurgery.2023; 171: e412. CrossRef
An Injectable Engineered Cartilage Gel Improves Intervertebral Disc Repair in a Rat Nucleotomy Model Basanta Bhujel, Soon Shim Yang, Hwal Ran Kim, Sung Bum Kim, Byoung-Hyun Min, Byung Hyune Choi, Inbo Han International Journal of Molecular Sciences.2023; 24(4): 3146. CrossRef
Factors associated with incomplete clinical improvement in patients undergoing transforaminal endoscopic lumbar discectomy for lumbar disc herniation Khanathip Jitpakdee, Yanting Liu, Young-jin Kim, Vit Kotheeranurak, Jin-sung Kim European Spine Journal.2023; 32(8): 2700. CrossRef
Minimal Clinically Important Difference and Patient-Acceptable Symptom State in Orthopaedic Spine Surgery Ebubechi K. Adindu, Devender Singh, Matthew Geck, John Stokes, Eeric Truumees JBJS Reviews.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Cost-utility analysis of endoscopic lumbar discectomy following a uniform clinical pathway in the Korean national health insurance system Chi Heon Kim, Yunhee Choi, Chun Kee Chung, Seung Heon Yang, Chang-Hyun Lee, Sung Bae Park, Keewon Kim, Sun Gun Chung, Sathish Muthu PLOS ONE.2023; 18(6): e0287092. CrossRef
Risk Factors of Low Back Pain Aggravation After Tubular Microdiscectomy of Lumbar Disc Herniation Fengzhao Zhu, Yu Chen, Dongqing Jia, Yaqing Zhang, Yan Peng, Ya Ning, Xue Leng, Chencheng Feng, Yue Zhou, Changqing Li, Bo Huang World Neurosurgery.2023; 178: e673. CrossRef
Enhanced Intervertebral Disc Repair via Genetically Engineered Mesenchymal Stem Cells with Tetracycline Regulatory System Yeji Kim, Seong Bae An, Sang-Hyuk Lee, Jong Joo Lee, Sung Bum Kim, Jae-Cheul Ahn, Dong-Youn Hwang, Inbo Han International Journal of Molecular Sciences.2023; 24(22): 16024. CrossRef
Safety and Feasibility of Intradiscal Administration of Matrilin-3-Primed Adipose-Derived Mesenchymal Stromal Cell Spheroids for Chronic Discogenic Low Back Pain: Phase 1 Clinical Trial Dong Hyun Lee, Kwang-Sook Park, Hae Eun Shin, Sung Bum Kim, Hyejeong Choi, Seong Bae An, Hyemin Choi, Joo Pyung Kim, Inbo Han International Journal of Molecular Sciences.2023; 24(23): 16827. CrossRef
Objective Our study aims to evaluate the impact of severity of preoperative Neck Disability Index (NDI) on postoperative patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs).
Methods A retrospective review of primary, elective, single or multilevel anterior cervical discectomy and fusion or cervical disc arthroplasty procedures between 2013 and 2019 was performed. Visual analogue scale (VAS) neck and arm, NDI, 12-item Short Form physical and mental composite score (SF-12 PCS and MCS), Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System physical function, and 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) were collected preoperatively and postoperatively. Patients were categorized by preoperative NDI: none-to-mild disability ( < 30); moderate disability ( ≥ 30 to < 50); severe disability ( ≥ 50 to < 70); complete disability ( ≥ 70). The impact of preoperative NDI on PROM scores and minimum clinically important difference (MCID) achievement rates were evaluated.
Results The cohort included 74 patients with none-to-mild disability, 95 moderate, 76 severe, and 17 with complete disability. Patients with greater preoperative disability demonstrated significantly different scores for NDI, VAS neck, SF-12 MCS, and PHQ-9 at all timepoints (p < 0.001). Patients with more severe disability demonstrated different magnitudes of improvement for NDI (all p < 0.001), VAS neck (p ≤ 0.009), VAS arm (p = 0.025), and PHQ-9 (p ≤ 0.011). The effect of preoperative severity on MCID achievement was demonstrated for NDI and for PHQ-9 (p ≤ 0.007).
Conclusion Patients with severe neck disability demonstrated differences in pain, disability, physical and mental health. MCID achievement also differed by preoperative symptoms severity. Patients with more severe neck disability may be limited to the degree of improvement in quality of life but perceive them as significant changes.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Preoperative Disability Influences Effectiveness of Minimal Clinically Important Difference and Patient Acceptable Symptom State in Predicting Patient Improvement Following Cervical Spine Surgery Pratyush Shahi, Omri Maayan, Tejas Subramanian, Nishtha Singh, Sumedha Singh, Kasra Araghi, Olivia Tuma, Tomoyuki Asada, Maximilian Korsun, Evan Sheha, James Dowdell, Sheeraz A. Qureshi, Sravisht Iyer Global Spine Journal.2025; 15(2): 884. CrossRef
Are Mildly Disabled Patients Appropriate for Spine Bundles? An Application of the Operative Value Index Advith Sarikonda, Ashmal Sami, D. Mitchell Self, Emily Isch, Alexander Zavitsanos, Antony A. Fuleihan, Ayra Khan, Conor Dougherty, Danyal Quraishi, Jack Jallo, Joshua Heller, Srinivas K. Prasad, Ashwini Sharan, James Harrop, Alexander R. Vaccaro, Ahilan S World Neurosurgery.2025; 196: 123797. CrossRef
Psychometric evaluation of the Japanese neck disability index by exploratory factor analysis in preoperative patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy: impact of pain and numbness Yasuaki Mizoguchi, Kiyokazu Akasaka, Kenta Suzuki, Fumihiko Kimura, Toby Hall, Satoshi Ogihara The Spine Journal.2024; 24(11): 2172. CrossRef
Influence of Preoperative Disability on Clinical Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion James W. Nie, Timothy J. Hartman, Omolabake O. Oyetayo, Eileen Zheng, Keith R. MacGregor, Dustin H. Massel, Arash J. Sayari, Kern Singh World Neurosurgery.2023; 171: e412. CrossRef
Differences in Time to Achieve Minimum Clinically Important Difference Between Patients Undergoing Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion and Cervical Disc Replacement Vincent P. Federico, James W. Nie, Timothy J. Hartman, Eileen Zheng, Omolabake O. Oyetayo, Keith R. MacGregor, Dustin H. Massel, Arash J. Sayari, Kern Singh World Neurosurgery.2023; 176: e337. CrossRef
Neck Disability Index as a Prognostic Factor for Outcomes Following Cervical Disc Replacement Timothy J. Hartman, James W. Nie, Keith R. MacGregor, Omolabake O. Oyetayo, Eileen Zheng, Kern Singh Clinical Spine Surgery.2023; 36(8): 310. CrossRef
Does Baseline Severity of Arm Pain Influence Outcomes Following Single-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion? Madhav R. Patel, Kevin C. Jacob, Frank A. Chavez, Alexander W. Parsons, Nisheka N. Vanjani, Hanna Pawlowski, Michael C. Prabhu, Kern Singh Asian Spine Journal.2023; 17(3): 500. CrossRef
Neck Disability at Presentation Influences Long-Term Clinical Improvement for Neck Pain, Arm Pain, Disability, and Physical Function in Patients Undergoing Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Kevin C. Jacob, Madhav R. Patel, Max A. Ribot, Hanna Pawlowski, Michael C. Prabhu, Nisheka N. Vanjani, Andrew P. Collins, Kern Singh World Neurosurgery.2022; 163: e663. CrossRef
James M. Parrish, Nathaniel W. Jenkins, Elliot D.K. Cha, Conor P. Lynch, Cara E. Geoghegan, Shruthi Mohan, Caroline N. Jadczak, David P. Matichak, Kern Singh
Neurospine 2021;18(1):155-162. Published online March 31, 2021
Objective Our study aims to evaluate the correlation of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System physical function (PROMIS PF) with legacy patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) among patients undergoing anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF).
Methods A prospectively maintained database was retrospectively reviewed for ACDF surgeries performed between May 2015 and September 2017. Inclusion criteria were primary elective, single- or multilevel ACDFs for degenerative spinal pathology. Patients lacking preoperative or 2-year PROMIS PF surveys were excluded. Mean scores were calculated for visual analogue scale (VAS) neck, VAS arm, Neck Disability Index (NDI), 12-Item Short Form Physical Component Score (SF-12 PCS), and PROMIS PF at preoperative and 6-week, 12-week, 6-month, 1-year, and 2-year postoperative timepoints. A t-test and Pearson correlation coefficient were utilized to evaluate score improvement and PROM relationships respectively.
Results The 50 subject cohort was 60.0% male, 50% obese (body mass index ≥ 30 kg/m2) and had an average age of 50.9 years. Significant improvements were demonstrated for VAS neck and NDI at all postoperative timepoints (p < 0.001) and for SF-12 and PROMIS PF at all timepoints except 6 weeks (p ≤ 0.025). VAS arm improvement was seen up to 1 year (p ≤ 0.016). PROMIS PF demonstrated strong correlations with NDI and SF-12 PCS at all evaluated timepoints and with VAS neck at all postoperative timepoints except 6 weeks (all p < 0.01).
Conclusion PROMIS PF was strongly correlated with pain, disability, and physical function up to 2 years for patients undergoing ACDF. Our results support the long-term validity of PROMIS PF for measurement of patient-reported physical function among ACDF cohorts.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Impact of Preoperative PROMIS PF on Outcomes Following Cervical Disc Replacement Cole T. Kwas, Tejas Subramanian, Joshua Zhang, Eric Mai, Annika Heuer, Chad Z. Simon, Nishtha Singh, Tomoyuki Asada, Kasra Araghi, Olivia C. Tuma, Maximilian K. Korsun, Myles R.J. Allen, Eric T. Kim, Avani S. Vaishnav, Evan D. Sheha, James E. Dowdell, Sh Clinical Spine Surgery.2026; 39(3): E161. CrossRef
Influence of Preoperative Physical Function Scores on Outcomes After Single-level Cervical Disc Replacement Timothy J. Hartman, James W. Nie, Eileen Zheng, Keith R. MacGregor, Omolabake O. Oyetayo, Kern Singh Clinical Spine Surgery.2025; 38(7): E376. CrossRef
Are Mildly Disabled Patients Appropriate for Spine Bundles? An Application of the Operative Value Index Advith Sarikonda, Ashmal Sami, D. Mitchell Self, Emily Isch, Alexander Zavitsanos, Antony A. Fuleihan, Ayra Khan, Conor Dougherty, Danyal Quraishi, Jack Jallo, Joshua Heller, Srinivas K. Prasad, Ashwini Sharan, James Harrop, Alexander R. Vaccaro, Ahilan S World Neurosurgery.2025; 196: 123797. CrossRef
Rates of cervical spine surgery and repeat epidural injections after cervical transforaminal epidural steroid injections for patients with cervical radiculopathy utilizing a large national database Andrew R. Stephens, Ramzi El-Hassan, Ashley Rogerson Interventional Pain Medicine.2025; 4(4): 100651. CrossRef
Quantitative evaluation of upper extremity strength recovery after cervical epidural block: a retrospective study Dong Hyuck Kim, Do Yun Kwon, Kwang-Ryeol Kim Journal of Yeungnam Medical Science.2025; 42: 73. CrossRef
Does Baseline Severity of Arm Pain Influence Outcomes Following Single-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion? Madhav R. Patel, Kevin C. Jacob, Frank A. Chavez, Alexander W. Parsons, Nisheka N. Vanjani, Hanna Pawlowski, Michael C. Prabhu, Kern Singh Asian Spine Journal.2023; 17(3): 500. CrossRef
Severe Obesity Is an Independent Risk Factor of Early Readmission and Nonhome Discharge After Cervical Disc Replacement Tejas Subramanian, Daniel Shinn, Pratyush Shahi, Izzet Akosman, Troy Amen, Omri Maayan, Eric Zhao, Kasra Araghi, Junho Song, Sidhant Dalal, James Dowdell, Sravisht Iyer, Sheeraz Qureshi Neurospine.2023; 20(3): 890. CrossRef
The Veterans Rand-12 Physical Composite Score Prognosticates Postoperative Clinical Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Andrea M. Roca, Fatima N. Anwar, Alexandra C. Loya, Srinath S. Medakkar, Aayush Kaul, Jacob C. Wolf, Ishan Khosla, Vincent P. Federico, Arash J. Sayari, Gregory D. Lopez, Kern Singh World Neurosurgery.2023; 180: e756. CrossRef
Completion Rates for PROMIS Physical Function Surveys Compared with Legacy PROMs in Patients Undergoing Cervical Spine Surgery Conor P. Lynch, Elliot D.K. Cha, Kevin C. Jacob, Madhav R. Patel, Cara E. Geoghegan, Hanna Pawlowski, Michael C. Prabhu, Nisheka N. Vanjani, Kern Singh Journal of Orthopaedic Experience & Innovation.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Neck Disability at Presentation Influences Long-Term Clinical Improvement for Neck Pain, Arm Pain, Disability, and Physical Function in Patients Undergoing Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Kevin C. Jacob, Madhav R. Patel, Max A. Ribot, Hanna Pawlowski, Michael C. Prabhu, Nisheka N. Vanjani, Andrew P. Collins, Kern Singh World Neurosurgery.2022; 163: e663. CrossRef
Level-specific Perioperative and Clinical Outcome Comparison: Cervical Disk Replacement Versus Anterior Cervical Diskectomy and Fusion at C5-C6 in Patients With Myeloradiculopathy Kevin C. Jacob, Madhav R. Patel, Alexander W. Parsons, Michael C. Prabhu, Max A. Ribot, Hanna Pawlowski, Nisheka N. Vanjani, Kern Singh Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.2022; 30(17): e1137. CrossRef
The Effect of the Preoperative Severity of Neck Pain on Patient-Reported Outcome Measures and Minimum Clinically Important Difference Achievement After Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Madhav R. Patel, Kevin C. Jacob, James W. Nie, Timothy J. Hartman, Nisheka Vanjani, Hanna Pawlowski, Michael Prabhu, Kanhai S. Amin, Kern Singh World Neurosurgery.2022; 165: e337. CrossRef
Preoperative Physical Function Association With Mental Health Improvement After Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion James M. Parrish, Nathaniel W. Jenkins, Conor P. Lynch, Elliot D.K. Cha, Thomas S. Brundage, Nadia M. Hrynewycz, Kern Singh Clinical Spine Surgery.2021; 34(10): E559. CrossRef
Efficacy for Whitlockite for Augmenting Spinal Fusion Su Yeon Kwon, Jung Hee Shim, Yu Ha Kim, Chang Su Lim, Seong Bae An, Inbo Han International Journal of Molecular Sciences.2021; 22(23): 12875. CrossRef
Objective This study examines the associations between preoperative Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) physical function (PF) score, measured by PROMIS-PF and the change between pre- and postoperative PROMIS-PF scores.
Methods A prospectively maintained surgical registry was retrospectively reviewed for spine surgeries between May 2015–June 2019. Inclusion criteria were primary, single-level minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusions. Revisions, multilevel procedures, and patients missing preoperative surveys were excluded. Patients were grouped by preoperative PROMIS-PF scores of ≥ 35 and < 35, with higher scores indicating greater PF. A chi-squared and Student t-test were used to analyze categorical and continuous variables respectively. Linear regression evaluated the relationship of PROMIS-PF score improvement.
Results Of the 180 subjects, 84 were in the PROMIS-PF < 35 group which had more obese patients (p < 0.001) and more males (p = 0.001). Length of stay was greater for the PROMIS-PF < 35 group (36.2 hours vs. 28.7 hours, p = 0.014). PROMIS-PF and Oswestry Disability Index scores were significantly different between subgroups at all timepoints. PROMIS-PF < 35 cohort had larger postoperative PROMIS-PF improvements at 6 weeks (p = 0.008) and 12 weeks (p = 0.003). Linear regression demonstrated a negative association between preoperative PROMIS-PF scores and improvement at 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 6 months, and 2 years (p < 0.001). PROMIS-PF < 35 demonstrated significantly lower rate of achieving minimum clinically important difference at 6 months, otherwise no difference observed throughout the 2-year follow-up.
Conclusion Up to 6 months postoperatively, lower preoperative PROMIS-PF scores were associated with larger PROMIS-PF improvements. Understanding the relationship preoperative PROMIS-PF scores have with postoperative improvement may enable better patient counseling.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Impact of Preoperative PROMIS PF on Outcomes Following Cervical Disc Replacement Cole T. Kwas, Tejas Subramanian, Joshua Zhang, Eric Mai, Annika Heuer, Chad Z. Simon, Nishtha Singh, Tomoyuki Asada, Kasra Araghi, Olivia C. Tuma, Maximilian K. Korsun, Myles R.J. Allen, Eric T. Kim, Avani S. Vaishnav, Evan D. Sheha, James E. Dowdell, Sh Clinical Spine Surgery.2026; 39(3): E161. CrossRef
Predictors of Delayed Clinical Benefit Following Surgical Treatment for Low-grade Spondylolisthesis Mladen Djurasovic, Leah Y. Carreon, Erica F. Bisson, Andrew K. Chan, Mohamad Bydon, Praveen V. Mummaneni, Kevin T. Foley, Christopher I. Shaffrey, Eric A. Potts, Mark E. Shaffrey, Domagoj Coric, John J. Knightly, Paul Park, Michael Y. Wang, Kai-Ming Fu, J Spine.2025; 50(11): E213. CrossRef
New Patient PROMIS Scores of Patients Presenting with Low Back Pain Predict Time to Elective Spine Surgery Justin E. Kung, Chase Gauthier, Yianni Bakaes, Michael Spitnale, Richard A. Bidwell, David G. Edelman, Heidi C. Ventresca, J. Benjamin Jackson, Shari Cui, Gregory Grabowski Spine Surgery and Related Research.2025; 9(2): 237. CrossRef
Association Between Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Function With Postoperative Pain, Narcotics Consumption, and Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Following Lumbar Microdiscectomy Patawut Bovonratwet, Avani S. Vaishnav, Jung K. Mok, Hikari Urakawa, Marcel Dupont, Dimitra Melissaridou, Pratyush Shahi, Junho Song, Daniel J. Shinn, Sidhant S. Dalal, Kasra Araghi, Evan D. Sheha, Catherine H. Gang, Sheeraz A. Qureshi Global Spine Journal.2024; 14(1): 225. CrossRef
Socioeconomic disadvantage is correlated with worse PROMIS outcomes following lumbar fusion Hashim J.F. Shaikh, Clarke I. Cady-McCrea, Emmanuel N. Menga, Robert W. Molinari, Addisu Mesfin, Paul T. Rubery, Varun Puvanesarajah The Spine Journal.2024; 24(1): 107. CrossRef
Depression State Correlates with Functional Recovery Following Elective Lumbar Spine Fusion Clarke I. Cady-McCrea, Hashim J.F. Shaikh, Sandeep Mannava, Jonathan Stone, Hamid Hassanzadeh, Addisu Mesfin, Robert W. Molinari, Emmanuel N. Menga, Paul T. Rubery, Varun Puvanesarajah World Neurosurgery.2024; 187: e107. CrossRef
The Influence of Presenting Physical Function on Postoperative Patient Satisfaction and Clinical Outcomes Following Minimally Invasive Lumbar Decompression Kevin C. Jacob, Madhav R. Patel, Grant A. Park, Jessica R. Gheewala, Nisheka N. Vanjani, Hanna Pawlowski, Michael C. Prabhu, Kern Singh Clinical Spine Surgery.2023; 36(1): E6. CrossRef
Pearls and pitfalls of PROMIS clinically significant outcomes in orthopaedic surgery Ron Gilat, Ilan Y. Mitchnik, Sumit Patel, Jeremy A. Dubin, Gabriel Agar, Eran Tamir, Dror Lindner, Yiftah Beer Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery.2023; 143(11): 6617. CrossRef
Two-year validation and minimal clinically important difference of the Veterans RAND 12 Item Health Survey Physical Component Score in patients undergoing minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion Conor P. Lynch, Elliot D. K. Cha, Shruthi Mohan, Cara E. Geoghegan, Caroline N. Jadczak, Kern Singh Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine.2022; 36(5): 731. CrossRef
Impact of Ambulatory Setting for Workers’ Compensation Patients Undergoing One-Level Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Review of the Literature James W. Nie, Timothy J. Hartman, Hanna Pawlowski, Michael C. Prabhu, Nisheka N. Vanjani, Omolabake O. Oyetayo, Kern Singh World Neurosurgery.2022; 167: e251. CrossRef
Martin Nikolaus Stienen, Nicolai Maldaner, Marketa Sosnova, Holger Joswig, Marco Vincenzo Corniola, Luca Regli, Gerhard Hildebrandt, Karl Schaller, Oliver Pascal Gautschi
Neurospine 2020;17(1):270-280. Published online January 26, 2020
Objective The patient-reported outcome measure (PROM)-based evaluation in lumbar degenerative disc disease (DDD) is today’s gold standard but has limitations. We studied the impact of lower extremity motor deficits (LEMDs) on PROMs and a new objective outcome measure.
Methods We evaluated patients with lumbar DDD from a prospective 2-center database. LEMDs were graded according to the British Medical Research Council (BMRC; 5 [normal] –0 [no movement]). The PROM-based evaluation included pain (visual analogue scale), disability (Oswestry Disability Index [ODI] & Roland-Morris Disability Index [RMDI]), and health-related quality of life (HRQoL; Short-Form 12 physical component summary/mental component summary & EuroQol-5D index). Objective functional impairment (OFI) was determined as age- and sex-adjusted Timed-Up and Go (TUG) test value.
Results One hundred five of 375 patients (28.0%) had a LEMD. Patients with LEMD had slightly higher disability (ODI: 52.8 vs. 48.2, p = 0.025; RMDI: 12.6 vs. 11.3, p = 0.034) but similar pain and HRQoL scores. OFI T-scores were significantly higher in patients with LEMD (144.2 vs. 124.3, p = 0.006). When comparing patients with high- (BMRC 0–2) vs. low-grade LEMD (BMRC 3–4), no difference was evident for the PROM-based evaluation (all p > 0.05) but patients with high-grade LEMD had markedly higher OFI T-scores (280.9 vs. 136.0, p = 0.001). Patients with LEMD had longer TUG test times and OFI T-scores than matched controls without LEMDs.
Conclusion Our data suggest that PROMs fail to sufficiently account for LEMD-associated disability, which is common and oftentimes bothersome to patients. The objective functional evaluation with the TUG test appears to be more sensitive to LEMD-associated disability. An objective functional evaluation of patients with LEMD appears reasonable.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Association of oxidative stress with postural control and functional outcomes in lumbar degenerative disease: An exploratory cross-sectional study Yuta Yamazaki, Hidetoshi Nojiri, Noriaki Aita, Eriko Kitahara, Ryosuke Takahashi, Muneaki Ishijima, Toshiyuki Fujiwara Journal of Orthopaedic Science.2026;[Epub] CrossRef
Objectively measured physical activity following lumbar decompression surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis Sree Kanakala, Alisha Mahmud, Iihan Ali, Hassan Tahir, Riese Patel, Milos Brkljac, Tim Lindsay Scientific Reports.2026;[Epub] CrossRef
Impact of Drop Foot Recovery on Patient-Reported Outcomes following Surgery for Lumbar Degenerative Disease Tatsuya Yamamoto, Momotaro Kawai, Tomohisa Tabata, Yohei Takahashi, Jun Ogawa Spine Surgery and Related Research.2026; 10(3): 432. CrossRef
Reliable outcome parameters in patients with lumbar radiculopathy attributed to disc herniation: an observational study Giannina Bianchi, Christian Zweifel, Erich Hohenauer, Joseph Alvin Ramos Santos, Ron Clijsen Frontiers in Musculoskeletal Disorders.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Preoperative motor weakness and the impact on patient reported outcomes in lateral lumbar interbody fusion Aayush Kaul, Andrea M. Roca, Fatima N. Anwar, Jacob C. Wolf, Ishan Khosla, Alexandra C. Loya, Srinath S. Medakkar, Vincent P. Federico, Arash J. Sayari, Gregory D. Lopez, Kern Singh Journal of Clinical Neuroscience.2024; 125: 7. CrossRef
ACUTE RADIATING LOW BACK PAIN IMPACT ON ROUTINE AND FUNCTION OF THE BRAZILIAN POPULATION: A CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY GUILHERME HENRIQUE PORCEBAN, ALEXANDRE FELIPE FRANÇA FILHO, RENATO HIROSHI SALVIONI UETA, DAVID DEL CURTO, EDUARDO BARROS PUERTAS, MARCEL JUN SUGAWARA TAMAOKI Acta Ortopédica Brasileira.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Preoperative Motor Function Associated with Short-Term Gain of Health-Related Quality of Life after Surgery for Lumbar Degenerative Disease: A Pilot Prospective Cohort Study in Japan Yuya Ishibashi, Yosuke Tomita, Shigeyuki Imura, Nobuyuki Takeuchi Healthcare.2023; 11(24): 3103. CrossRef
Association of Medical Comorbidities With Objective Functional Impairment in Lumbar Degenerative Disc Disease Victor E. Staartjes, Holger Joswig, Marco V. Corniola, Karl Schaller, Oliver P. Gautschi, Martin N. Stienen Global Spine Journal.2022; 12(6): 1184. CrossRef
External Validation of the Minimum Clinically Important Difference in the Timed-up-and-go Test After Surgery for Lumbar Degenerative Disc Disease Nicolai Maldaner, Marketa Sosnova, Michal Ziga, Anna M. Zeitlberger, Oliver Bozinov, Oliver P. Gautschi, Astrid Weyerbrock, Luca Regli, Martin N. Stienen Spine.2022; 47(4): 337. CrossRef
Psychometric Properties of the Scoliosis Research Society Questionnaire (Version 22r) Domains Among Adults With Spinal Deformity: A Rasch Measurement Theory Analysis Kati Kyrölä, Susanna Hiltunen, Mikko M. Uimonen, Jari Ylinen, Arja Häkkinen, Jussi P. Repo Neurospine.2022; 19(2): 422. CrossRef
External Validation of the Timed Up and Go Test as Measure of Objective Functional Impairment in Patients With Lumbar Degenerative Disc Disease Martin N Stienen, Nicolai Maldaner, Marketa Sosnova, Anna M Zeitlberger, Michal Ziga, Astrid Weyerbrock, Oliver Bozinov, Oliver P Gautschi Neurosurgery.2021; 88(2): E142. CrossRef
A New Possible Standard in Evaluating Lower Extremity Motor Weakness Kern Singh Neurospine.2020; 17(1): 285. CrossRef
The Bull or the Horn – What Are Outcomes Data? James Harrop Neurospine.2020; 17(1): 281. CrossRef
Does the Rise of Objective Measure of Functional Impairment Mean the Fall of PROMs? Satoshi Yamaguchi Neurospine.2020; 17(1): 283. CrossRef
Subjective and Objective Measures of Symptoms, Function, and Outcome in Patients With Degenerative Spine Disease Nicolai Maldaner, Martin Nikolaus Stienen Arthritis Care & Research.2020; 72(S10): 183. CrossRef
Physical Performance Tests Provide Distinct Information in Both Predicting and Assessing Patient-Reported Outcomes Following Lumbar Spine Surgery Hiral Master, Jacquelyn S. Pennings, Rogelio A. Coronado, Abigail L. Henry, Michael T. O’Brien, Christine M. Haug, Richard L. Skolasky, Lee H. Riley, Brian J. Neuman, Joseph S. Cheng, Oran S. Aaronson, Clinton J. Devin, Stephen T. Wegener, Kristin R. Arch Spine.2020; 45(23): E1556. CrossRef
Normative data of a smartphone app–based 6-minute walking test, test-retest reliability, and content validity with patient-reported outcome measures Lazar Tosic, Elior Goldberger, Nicolai Maldaner, Marketa Sosnova, Anna M. Zeitlberger, Victor E. Staartjes, Pravesh S. Gadjradj, Hubert A. J. Eversdijk, Ayesha Quddusi, Maria L. Gandía-González, Jamasb Joshua Sayadi, Atman Desai, Luca Regli, Oliver P. Gau Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine.2020; 33(4): 480. CrossRef
Evaluation of the 6-minute walking test as a smartphone app-based self-measurement of objective functional impairment in patients with lumbar degenerative disc disease Nicolai Maldaner, Marketa Sosnova, Anna M. Zeitlberger, Michal Ziga, Oliver P. Gautschi, Luca Regli, Astrid Weyerbrock, Martin N. Stienen, _ _ Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine.2020; 33(6): 779. CrossRef
Objective The relationship between bone graft technique and postoperative outcomes for minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS TLIF) has not been well-defined. This study aims to determine the effect of iliac crest bone grafting (ICBG) on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and complication rates following MIS TLIF.
Methods Primary, single-level MIS TLIF patients were consecutively analyzed. Patients that prospectively received a percutaneous technique of ICBG were compared to patients that retrospectively received bone morphogenetic protein-2 (BMP-2). Complication rates were assessed perioperatively and up to 1 year postoperatively. Changes in Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), visual analogue scale (VAS) back, and VAS leg pain were compared. Rates of minimum clinically important difference (MCID) achievement at final follow-up for ODI, VAS back, and VAS leg scores were compared.
Results One hundred forty-nine patients were included: 101 in the BMP-2 cohort and 48 in the ICBG cohort. The ICBG cohort demonstrated increases in intraoperative blood loss and shorter lengths of stay. ICBG patients also experienced longer operative times, though this did not reach statistical significance. No significant differences in complication or reoperation rates were identified. The ICBG cohort demonstrated greater improvements in VAS leg pain at 6-week and 12-week follow-up. No other significant differences in PROs or MCID achievement rates were identified.
Conclusion Patients undergoing MIS TLIF with ICBG experienced clinically insignificant increases in intraoperative blood loss and did not experience increases in postoperative pain or disability. Complication and reoperation rates were similar between groups. These results suggest that ICBG is a safe option for MIS TLIF.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Posterior Wall Reconstruction Using Iliac Strut Graft in Posterior Acetabular Wall Fracture SINA HAGHIGHAT, MAZIAR MALEKZADE, ALI MOUSAPOUR, YAHYA SALIMI, VAHID FEIZOLAHI, GHOBAD RAMEZANI Acta chirurgiae orthopaedicae et traumatologiae Cechoslovaca.2026; 92(6): 343. CrossRef
Analysis of Procedural Costs and Outcomes Between Autograft, BMP-2, and Viable Cellular Allograft in Lumbar Interbody Fusions Thomas P. Giannasca, Michael Mancini, Jake M. Laverdiere, Ekrem M. Ayhan, Marissa Gedman, Alexander K. Hahn, Laura Sanzari, Aris Yannopoulos Spine.2026; 51(7): 508. CrossRef
A systematic review of bone graft products used in lumbar interbody fusion procedures for degenerative disc disease Anita Fitzgerald, Rachael McCool, Emma Carr, Paul Miller, Katie Reddish, Cynthia C Lohr, Elena Annoni, Brandon Lawrence North American Spine Society Journal (NASSJ).2025; 21: 100579. CrossRef
Evolution of the Minimally Invasive Surgery Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Where Are We Now? Abraham Dada, Satvir Saggi, Vardhaan S. Ambati, Arati Patel, Praveen V. Mummaneni Neurosurgery.2025; 96(3S): S33. CrossRef
Efficacy and Safety of Osteobiologics for Lumbar Spinal Fusion Luca Ambrosio, Jordy Schol, Shota Tamagawa, Sathish Muthu, Daisuke Sakai, Rocco Papalia, Gianluca Vadalà, Vincenzo Denaro Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery.2025; 107(18): 2110. CrossRef
Comparative Efficacy of Bone Graft Materials in Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Sami Al Eissa, Fahad Al Helal, Majed Abaalkhail, Abdullah Al Shehri, Raed Al Mousa, Abdullah Bin Shabib, Hussam Al Angari, Abdulrahman M. AlJahani, Dana W. AlDughiman Journal of Spine Practice.2025; 4(3): 88. CrossRef
Comparative evaluation of clinical-radiological outcomes of Russian osteoplastic material BioOst in minimally invasive transforaminal interbody fusion V. V. Khlebov, I. V. Volkov Russian Neurosurgical Journal named after Professor A. L. Polenov.2025; 17(3): 123. CrossRef
Comparative Analysis of ABM/P-15, Bone Morphogenic Protein and Demineralized Bone Matrix after Instrumented Lumbar Interbody Fusion Ashwin Sathe, Sang-Ho Lee, Shin-Jae Kim, Sang Soo Eun, Yong Soo Choi, Shih-min Lee, Ju-Wan Seuk, Yoon Sun Lee, Sang-Ha Shin, Junseok Bae Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society.2022; 65(6): 825. CrossRef
A BMP/Activin A Chimera Induces Posterolateral Spine Fusion in Nonhuman Primates at Lower Concentrations Than BMP-2 Howard J. Seeherman, Christopher G. Wilson, Eric J. Vanderploeg, Christopher T. Brown, Pablo R. Morales, Douglas C. Fredricks, John M. Wozney Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery.2021; 103(16): e64. CrossRef
A Prospective, Multi-Center, Double-Blind, Randomized Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of the Synthetic Bone Graft Material DBM Gel with rhBMP-2 versus DBM Gel Used during the TLIF Procedure in Patients with Lumbar Disc Disease Seung-Jae Hyun, Seung Hwan Yoon, Joo Han Kim, Jae Keun Oh, Chang-Hyun Lee, Jun Jae Shin, Jiin Kang, Yoon Ha Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society.2021; 64(4): 562. CrossRef
Autologous Bone Grafting in Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery: An Evidence-Based Narrative Review Filippo Migliorini, Francesco Cuozzo, Ernesto Torsiello, Filippo Spiezia, Francesco Oliva, Nicola Maffulli Journal of Clinical Medicine.2021; 10(19): 4347. CrossRef
Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion — A narrative review on the present status S. Phani Kiran, G. Sudhir Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma.2021; 22: 101592. CrossRef
Efficacy for Whitlockite for Augmenting Spinal Fusion Su Yeon Kwon, Jung Hee Shim, Yu Ha Kim, Chang Su Lim, Seong Bae An, Inbo Han International Journal of Molecular Sciences.2021; 22(23): 12875. CrossRef
First
Prev
