Skip to main navigation Skip to main content
  • E-Submission
  • Contact us

NS : Neurospine

OPEN ACCESS
ABOUT
BROWSE ARTICLES
FOR CONTRIBUTORS

Page Path

3
results for

"Follow-up"

Article category

Publication year

Keywords

Authors

Funded articles

"Follow-up"

Original Articles

Regular Issue

Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:

Include:

Comparison of Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes Between Transforaminal Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy and Microdiscectomy: A Follow-up Exceeding 5 Years
Neurospine. 2024;21(1):303-313.   Published online February 1, 2024
Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:
Include:
Comparison of Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes Between Transforaminal Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy and Microdiscectomy: A Follow-up Exceeding 5 Years
Neurospine. 2024;21(1):303-313.   Published online February 1, 2024
Close
Objective
To compare the long-term clinical and radiographic outcomes of transforaminal endoscopic lumbar discectomy (TELD) versus microdiscectomy (MD).
Methods
The data of 154 patients with lumbar disc herniation (LDH) who underwent TELD (n = 89) or MD (n = 65) were retrospectively analyzed. The patients’ clinical outcomes were evaluated using visual analogue scales for leg and low back pain, the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). The evolution of radiographic manifestations was observed during follow-up. Potential risk factors for a poor clinical outcome were investigated.
Results
During a mean follow-up of 5.5 years (range, 5–7 years), the recurrence rate was 4.49% in the TELD group and 1.54% in the MD group. All scores significantly improved from preoperatively to postoperatively in both groups (p < 0.01). The improvement in the ODI and JOA scores was significantly greater in the TELD than MD group (p < 0.05). Forty-seven patients (52.8%) in the TELD group and 32 (49.2%) in the MD group had Modic changes before surgery, most of which showed no changes at the last follow-up. The degeneration grades of 292 discs (71.0%) were unchanged at the last follow-up, while 86 (20.9%) showed improvement, mostly at the upper adjacent segment. No significant difference was observed in the intervertebral height index or paraspinal muscle-disc ratio.
Conclusion
Both TELD and MD provide generally satisfactory long-term clinical outcomes for patients with LDH. TELD can be used as a reliable alternative to MD with less surgical trauma. Modic type II changes, decreased preoperative intervertebral height, and a high body mass index are predictors of a poor prognosis.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  Crossref logo
  • Comparison of the Converging Decompression Technique and Foraminoplasty Percutaneous Transforaminal Endoscopic Discectomy in the Treatment of Very Highly Upward Migrated Lumbar Disc Herniation
    Jianing Yang, Rongbo Yu, Yuyang Zheng, Pengfei Wang, Haitian Zhang, Bin Chen
    World Neurosurgery.2026; 205: 124718.     CrossRef
  • Bracing and Activity Restriction After Lumbar Discectomy Surgery: An International Survey of AO Spine Members
    Waeel O. Hamouda, Stipe Ćorluka, Sathish Muthu, Luca Ambrosio, Carla Cunha, Stjepan Ivandic, Mohamed A.R. Soliman, Fabrizio Russo, Sibylle Grad, In Ho Han, Gianluca Vadala, Hans-Jorg Meisel, Sam K. Cho, Tim S. Yoon, Jeffrey C. Wang, Amit Jain, Zorica Buse
    Neurospine.2026; 23(1): 109.     CrossRef
  • Efficacy of visualized reamer foraminoplasty in transforaminal endoscopic lumbar discectomy: a retrospective controlled study
    Honglin Liu, Yuxiang Hu, Yang Zhan, Zhixin Kang, Zhuoxuan Zhang, Chengyu Huang, Ningjing Zeng, Yang Xiao, Juntao Ma, Zibo Gao, Hao Liu, Guoyi Su, Yongpeng Lin, Zhirong Fan, Dingkun Lin, Yihao Liang, Yongjin Li
    Frontiers in Surgery.2026;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Does Transforaminal Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy Provide More Value than Microdiscectomy? An Application of the Operative Value Index
    Advith Sarikonda, Adam Leibold, Ashmal Sami, Cheritesh R. Amaravadi, Daniyal Mansoor Ali, Sara Thalheimer, Jack Jallo, Joshua Heller, Srinivas K. Prasad, Ashwini Sharan, James Harrop, Alexander R. Vaccaro, Ahilan Sivaganesan
    Operative Neurosurgery.2025; 29(2): 209.     CrossRef
  • Cost-effectiveness analysis of extended endoscopic lumbar foraminotomy (EELF) and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF): a prospective observational study
    Jun-Hoe Kim, Hangeul Park, Chang-Hyun Lee, Chi Heon Kim
    Scientific Reports.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Full-endoscopic lumbar spine discectomy: Are We Finally There? A Meta-Analysis of Its Effectiveness Against Non-microscopic Discectomy, Microdiscectomy and Tubular Discectomy
    Kajetan Latka, Klaudia Kozlowska, Kacper Domisiewicz, Tomasz Klepinowski, Dariusz Latka
    The Spine Journal.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • A Commentary on “Far-Lateral Transforaminal Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy for Upper Lumbar Disc Herniations”
    Jason Pui Yin Cheung
    Neurospine.2025; 22(1): 28.     CrossRef
  • Far-Lateral Transforaminal Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy for Upper Lumbar Disc Herniations
    Jin Seop Hwang, Sang Hyub Lee, Dain Jeong, Jae-Won Jang, Yong Eun Cho, Dong-Geun Lee, Choon Keun Park, Chung Kee Chough
    Neurospine.2025; 22(1): 14.     CrossRef
  • Acute Spinal Problems in the Elderly
    Joshua Rutnagur, Andrew Frost, Mohit Arora, Jennifer Lowrie, Santosh Baliga
    British Journal of Hospital Medicine.2025; 86(4): 1.     CrossRef
  • Comparison of Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes Between Percutaneous Endoscopic Transforaminal Diskectomy and Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Diskectomy for the Treatment of L4/5-Level MSU Size-3 Lumbar Disk Herniation: A 2-Year Retrospective Cohort Study
    Rongkun Xu, Liang Wang, Xinyu Yang, Xing Chen, Wenyang Fu, Shangye Li, Xinzhi Zhang, Xinyu Liu, Lianlei Wang
    Neurosurgery.2025; 97(5): 1188.     CrossRef
  • O-arm navigation-based transforaminal unilateral biportal endoscopic discectomy for upper lumbar disc herniation: an innovative preliminary study
    Dong Hyun Lee, Choon Keun Park, Jin-Sung Kim, Jin Sub Hwang, Jin Young Lee, Dong-Geun Lee, Jae-Won Jang, Jun Yong Kim, Yong-Eun Cho, Dong Chan Lee
    Asian Spine Journal.2025; 19(2): 194.     CrossRef
  • A meta-analysis of percutaneous endoscopic discectomy and microdiscectomy for lumbar disc herniation: assessing surgical efficacy and clinical outcomes
    Ahmed M. Taha, Awad Hegab, Mohammed Yousef, Marwan Abdelhakam, Shaimaa Ahmed Dahshan
    Neurological Research.2025; 47(10): 997.     CrossRef
  • Prevalence of Low Back Pain and Functional Disability in Post-Lumbar Laminectomy Patients: A Cross-sectional Study
    Arbab Habib Ullah, Shabi ul Hassan, Arshad Ali, Kainat, Madeeha Khattak, Hammad Farooq
    The Healer Journal of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation Sciences.2025; 5(1): 209.     CrossRef
  • Clinical outcomes of unilateral biportal endoscopic discectomy for the treatment of far lateral lumbar disc herniation: a retrospective comparative study
    Shuo Yuan, Ziqian Ma, Ruiyuan Chen, Aobo Wang, Yu Xi, Tianyi Wang, Ning Fan, Peng Du, Lei Zang
    BMC Surgery.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • 13,931 View
  • 187 Download
  • 13 Web of Science
  • 14 Crossref

Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:

Include:

Factors Associated With Longer Postoperative Outpatient Follow-up Duration in Patients With Single Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Noncomplicated Patient Cohort Study
Neurospine. 2018;15(3):225-230.   Published online August 29, 2018
Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:
Include:
Factors Associated With Longer Postoperative Outpatient Follow-up Duration in Patients With Single Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Noncomplicated Patient Cohort Study
Neurospine. 2018;15(3):225-230.   Published online August 29, 2018
Close
Objective
Many reports have described the outcomes of surgical treatment of lumbar disc herniation (LDH). However, few reports have investigated the treatment period after lumbar disc surgery. If no complications occur, how long should an ordinary patient be treated? Which factors are associated with the outpatient follow-up period (OFP)? To answer these questions, we reviewed the medical records of patients who underwent lumbar disc surgery, calculated their average OFP, and sought to identify factors associated with the OFP.
Methods
Patients who underwent surgical treatment of single-level LDH from July 2005 to December 2011 were enrolled in this study. Patients who had no pain or required no further treatment did not receive follow-up. Patients’ medical records were reviewed retrospectively. Cases of recurrent LDH, postoperative infections, instrumentation, cauda equina syndrome, postoperative hematoma, trauma-associated herniation, and spondylolisthesis were excluded. We reviewed the postoperative hospitalization period (PHP) and the OFP. Sex, age, operation year, surgical approach, the operating surgeon, disc level, and insurance type were investigated as associated factors.
Results
In total, 611 patients underwent surgical treatment for single-level LDH by 4 surgeons. Their average age was 44.3 ± 15.1 years. There were 377 male and 234 female patients. The average PHP was 4.4 ± 3.2 days, the average OFP was 112.3 ± 198.6 days, and the 95% confidence interval for the OFP among the enrolled patients was between 96.5 and 128.1 days.
Conclusion
Although this is a single-institute report, most LDH patients showed an OFP of less than 4 months after surgical treatment. In this study, sex, age, and insurance type seemed to be related with the OFP.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  Crossref logo
  • Nonsurgical treatment outcomes for surgical candidates with lumbar disc herniation: a comprehensive cohort study
    Chi Heon Kim, Yunhee Choi, Chun Kee Chung, Ki-Jeong Kim, Dong Ah Shin, Youn-Kwan Park, Woo-Keun Kwon, Seung Heon Yang, Chang Hyun Lee, Sung Bae Park, Eun Sang Kim, Hyunsook Hong, Yongeun Cho
    Scientific Reports.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • The Efficacy of Lumbar Hybrid Fusion for the Prevention of Adjacent Segment Disease
    Hyun-Jae Cho, Young San Ko, Young Il Won, Chang-Hyun Lee, Seung Heon Yang, Chi Heon Kim, Chun Kee Chung
    Clinical Spine Surgery.2021; 34(7): 260.     CrossRef
  • The Risk Factors of Early and Late-Onset Adjacent Segment Degeneration after Thoracolumbar Fusion Surgery
    Dong-Whee Kim, Jung-Ho Kim, Dal-Sung Ryu, Seung-Hwan Yoon
    The Nerve.2020; 6(2): 66.     CrossRef
  • 12,931 View
  • 154 Download
  • 4 Web of Science
  • 3 Crossref

Clinical Article

Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:

Include:

Radiological Efficacy of Cervical Lateral Mass Screw Insertion and Rod Fixation by Modified Magerl's Method (Yoon's Method) with Minimum 2 Years of Follow-up
Korean J Spine. 2012;9(3):137-141.   Published online September 30, 2012
Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:
Include:
Radiological Efficacy of Cervical Lateral Mass Screw Insertion and Rod Fixation by Modified Magerl's Method (Yoon's Method) with Minimum 2 Years of Follow-up
Korean J Spine. 2012;9(3):137-141.   Published online September 30, 2012
Close
Objective

Cervical lateral mass screw insertion and rod fixation is a useful method for stabilizing the cervical disease, so various modified techniques were present. Many surgeons had reported the biomechanical safety according to the screw positioning method in the cervical spine, but the modified Magerl's method (Yoon's method) was not well studied. So, this study assessed the radiological efficacy of the modified Magerl's method with long-term follow-up.

Methods

This study retrospectively reviewed 323 lateral mass screws of 50 patients who had followed-up at least 2 years. Radiologic data were analyzed as parameters of complications after operation, including kyphotic or lordotic change, bone fusion, pull-out or malposition of screw, foraminal stenosis, adjacent disc degeneration or aggravation, pseudoarthrosis, and vertebral artery injury.

Results

The mean follow-up period was 32 (24 to 52) months. There were kyphotic changes in 4.0%(2 of 50 cases). Unsuccessful bone fusion occurred in 4.0%(2 of 50 cases). Among the 323 screws, screw pull-out (4.0%. 2 of 50cases, 3 of 323 screws), foraminal invasion (1.2% of total screws), and facet injury (0.6% of total screws) occurred.

Conclusion

The lateral mass screw insertion and rod fixation by the modified Magerl's method (Yoon's method) is a safe and reliable technique with low rate of complication related to instruments in minimum 2 years follow-up.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  Crossref logo
  • Misplaced Cervical Screws Requiring Reoperation
    Jeremy C. Peterson, Paul M. Arnold, Zachary A. Smith, Wellington K. Hsu, Michael G. Fehlings, Robert A. Hart, Alan S. Hilibrand, Ahmad Nassr, Ra’Kerry K. Rahman, Chadi A. Tannoury, Tony Tannoury, Thomas E. Mroz, Bradford L. Currier, Anthony F. De Giacomo,
    Global Spine Journal.2017; 7(1_suppl): 46S.     CrossRef
  • 12,787 View
  • 103 Download
  • 1 Crossref