Objective The objective of the current study was to perform a retrospective review of a national database to assess the safety of cement augmentation for vertebral compression fractures in geriatric populations in varying age categories.
Methods The 2005–2016 National Surgical Quality Improvement Program databases were queried to identify patients undergoing kyphoplasty or vertebroplasty in the following age categories: 60–69, 70–79, 80–89, and 90+ years old. Demographic variables, comorbidity status, procedure type, provider specialty, inpatient/outpatient status, number of procedure levels, and periprocedure complications were compared between age categories using chi-square analysis. Multivariate logistic regressions controlling for patient and procedural variables were then performed to assess the relative periprocedure risks of adverse outcomes of patients in the different age categories relative to those who were 60–69 years old.
Results For the 60–69, 70–79, 80–89, and 90+ years old cohorts, 486, 822, 937, and 215 patients were identified, respectively. After controlling for patient and procedural variables, 30-day any adverse events, serious adverse events, reoperation, readmission, and mortality were not different for the respective age categories. Cases in the 80- to 89-year-old cohort were at increased risk of minor adverse events compared to cases in the 60- to 69-year-old cohort.
Conclusion As the population ages, cement augmentation is being considered as a treatment for vertebral compression fractures in increasingly older patients. These results suggest that even the very elderly may be appropriately considered for these procedures (level of evidence: 3).
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Surgical management of spinal metastases from primary lung carcinoma: demographics, clinical characteristics, and outcomes—A retrospective analysis Jun Li, Yuhan Zheng, Xiaohua Lv, Rong Zeng, Yating Zhao, Yucheng Xiang, Ke Zhan, Congcong Liu, Houqing Long, Ke Chen Frontiers in Surgery.2026;[Epub] CrossRef
Advantages of TiRobot-assisted surgery in the treatment of osteoporotic thoracolumbar compression fractures: a meta-analysis based on multiple clinical indicators Yu Liu, Zidong Xia, Huiling Chen, Jian Wang, Mengtian Cao, Guohang Shen, Mingyuan Fan, Kaiyong Wang, Yang Chen, Yupei Dai Journal of Robotic Surgery.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Spinal augmentation for vertebral body fractures in the elderly population Alexander R. Evans, Taylor Niznik, Chao Li, Zachary A. Smith GeroScience.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
The future of ambulatory surgery for geriatric patients Mary Ann Vann Best Practice & Research Clinical Anaesthesiology.2023; 37(3): 343. CrossRef
What are the risk factors for a second osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture? Sang Hoon Hwang, Pyung Goo Cho, Kyoung-Tae Kim, Keung Nyun Kim, Sang Hyun Kim, Sung Hyun Noh The Spine Journal.2023; 23(11): 1586. CrossRef
Beyond Pain Relief: An In-Depth Review of Vertebral Height Restoration After Balloon Kyphoplasty in Vertebral Compression Fractures Siddharth K Patel, Sohael Khan, Ventaktesh Dasari, Suvarn Gupta Cureus.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Risk of Revision After Vertebral Augmentation for Osteoporotic Vertebral Fracture: A Narrative Review Shinji Takahashi, Hiroyuki Inose, Koji Tamai, Masayoshi Iwamae, Hidetomi Terai, Hiroaki Nakamura Neurospine.2023; 20(3): 852. CrossRef
The Effectiveness of Vertebral Height Restoration Based on the Vertebroplasty Procedure Used to Treat Osteoporotic Vertebral Fractures Kunio Yokoyama, Naokado Ikeda, Hidekazu Tanaka, Yutaka Ito, Akira Sugie, Makoto Yamada, Masahiko Wanibuchi, Masahiro Kawanishi Neurospine.2023; 20(4): 1159. CrossRef
Treatment for Osteoporotic Vertebral Fracture - A Short Review of Orthosis and Percutaneous Vertebroplasty and Balloon Kyphoplasty Masahiro Kawanishi, Hidekazu Tanaka, Yutaka Ito, Makoto Yamada, Kunio Yokoyama, Akira Sugie, Naokado Ikeda Neurospine.2023; 20(4): 1124. CrossRef
Commentary on “Utilization of Vertebroplasty/Kyphoplasty in the Management of Compression Fractures: National Trends and Predictors of Vertebroplasty/Kyphoplasty” Sahir S. Jabbouri, Peter G. Whang Neurospine.2023; 20(4): 1140. CrossRef
Difference in the Cobb Angle Between Standing and Supine Position as a Prognostic Factor After Vertebral Augmentation in Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures In-Suk Bae, Byung Gwan Moon, Hee In Kang, Jae Hoon Kim, Cheolsu Jwa, Deok Ryeong Kim Neurospine.2022; 19(2): 357. CrossRef
Kyphoplasty: why, when and how? Umile Giuseppe Longo, Rocco Papalia, Sergio De Salvatore, Valentina Piccioni, Vincenzo Denaro International Journal of Bone Fragility.2022; 2(1): 41. CrossRef
Objective Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is the most commonly performed procedure for degenerative cervical spondylosis. Because of its relatively low invasiveness and surgical procedure, old age is not regarded as an exclusion criterion for ACDF. However, very few studies have been conducted on the radiological and clinical outcomes of ACDF in older patients. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the radiological and clinical outcomes of ACDF in older patients.
Methods We retrospectively analyzed 48 patients (> 65 years) who underwent ACDF from January 2011 to December 2015. We divided the patients into 2 groups: young-old age group (65–74 years) and middle-old age group (≥ 75 years). Cervical lateral radiographs taken in the neutral standing position were evaluated preoperatively (PRE), on postoperative day 7 (POST), and at the 1-year follow-up (F/U). The radiological parameters included cervical angle (CA: C2–7 Cobb angle), segmental angle, total intervertebral height, disc height, sagittal vertical axis (SVA), T1 slope (T1s), and range of cervical motion (extension CA minus flexion CA). Postoperative hospital days, comorbidities, complications, and clinical outcomes were also analyzed.
Results We analyzed data from 48 patients (group A: n = 30 patients, 46 segments, mean age, 68.60 ± 3.36 years; group B: n = 18 patients, 23 segments, mean age, 79.22 ± 2.63 years). The surgical levels were as follows: C3/4, 4; C4/5, 7; C5/6, 10; C6/7, 29; and C7/ T1, 6 levels, and there were no significant between-group differences in the distribution. There were no significant between-group differences in the fusion and subsidence rates (fusion rate: group A, 76.2%; group B, 71.4%; p = 0.732; subsidence rate: group A, 34.8%; group B, 26.1%; p = 0.587). There was no longitudinal trend in the repeated-measurements analysis of variance test of the 2 groups of the PRE, POST, and F/U data for each radiological parameter. According to the paired t-test, T1 slope (T1s), SVA, and CA did not differ preoperatively and postoperatively. There was no statistically significant difference in visual analogue scale scores (axial, arm), the Neck Disability Index, or Odom’s criteria between the 2 groups (p = 0.448, p = 0.357, and p = 0.913).
Conclusion There was no significant difference in radiological and clinical outcomes between young-old and middle-old patients. Middle-old age does not seem to be a limitation to ACDF, but larger-scale and longer-term studies are needed to confirm the findings of this study.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Impact of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols in elderly patients undergoing lumbar fusion: a systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis Yantong Zhang, Gang Chen, Mengting Xu, Huiqing Gao, Renji Zheng, Wenqin Lv, Zhiping Yin, Yingfeng Zhou, Jun Li, Shaowu Jin European Spine Journal.2026; 35(4): 2001. CrossRef
Predictors of Surgical Outcome After Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: A Prospective Middle Eastern Cohort Study Ahmed Al-Atraqchi, Rawan Alatraqchi, Yasoob A Alaameri Cureus.2026;[Epub] CrossRef
Do Elderly Patients Achieve Comparable Functional and Quality-of-Life Improvements After Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion for Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy? Jeremy Tze En Lim, Gerald Joseph Zeng, Graham S. Goh, Ming Han Lincoln Liow, Reuben Chee Cheong Soh, Chang Ming Guo, John Li-Tat Chen Global Spine Journal.2026;[Epub] CrossRef
Does Back Pain Improve Following Lumbar Decompression Alone? David J. Mazur-Hart, Christian G. Lopez Ramos, Joseph G. Nugent, Brannan E. O’Neill, Barry Cheaney, Hanne A. Gehling, Jamila Godil, Brandi W. Pang, Arilene Novak, James T. Obayashi, Travis C. Philipp, Clifford Lin, Jung U. Yoo, Christina H. Wright, James Clinical Spine Surgery.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Surgical management of spinal pathologies in the octogenarian: a narrative review Alexander R. Evans, Joshua Bakhsheshian, Christopher S. Graffeo, Zachary A. Smith GeroScience.2024; 46(4): 3555. CrossRef
Impact of age within younger populations on outcomes following cervical surgery in the ambulatory setting Timothy J. Hartman, James W. Nie, Hanna Pawlowski, Michael C. Prabhu, Nisheka N. Vanjani, Kern Singh Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma.2022; 34: 102016. CrossRef
Sagittal balance of the cervical spine: a systematic review and meta-analysis Parisa Azimi, Taravat Yazdanian, Edward C. Benzel, Yong Hai, Ali Montazeri European Spine Journal.2021; 30(6): 1411. CrossRef
Predictors associated with neurological recovery after anterior decompression with fusion for degenerative cervical myelopathy Hiroyuki Inose, Takashi Hirai, Toshitaka Yoshii, Atsushi Kimura, Katsushi Takeshita, Hirokazu Inoue, Asato Maekawa, Kenji Endo, Takeo Furuya, Akira Nakamura, Kanji Mori, Shunsuke Kanbara, Shiro Imagama, Shoji Seki, Shunji Matsunaga, Kunihiko Takahashi, At BMC Surgery.2021;[Epub] CrossRef
Efficacy for Whitlockite for Augmenting Spinal Fusion Su Yeon Kwon, Jung Hee Shim, Yu Ha Kim, Chang Su Lim, Seong Bae An, Inbo Han International Journal of Molecular Sciences.2021; 22(23): 12875. CrossRef
Commentary on “Surgical and Functional Outcomes of Expansive Open-Door Laminoplasty for Patients With Mild Kyphotic Cervical Alignment” Dongwuk Son Neurospine.2021; 18(4): 758. CrossRef
First
Prev
