Skip to main navigation Skip to main content
  • E-Submission
  • Contact us

NS : Neurospine

OPEN ACCESS
ABOUT
BROWSE ARTICLES
FOR AUTHORS

Page Path

3
results for

"Intraoperative neuromonitoring"

Article category

Publication year

Keywords

Authors

"Intraoperative neuromonitoring"

Original Article

Spine and Spinal Cord Tumors DSPN-Neurospine Special Issue

Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:

Include:

Long-term Neurologic Outcome After Spinal Ependymoma Resection With Multimodal Intraoperative Electrophysiological Recording: Cohort Study and Review of the Literature
Neurospine. 2022;19(1):118-132.   Published online March 31, 2022
Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:
Include:
Long-term Neurologic Outcome After Spinal Ependymoma Resection With Multimodal Intraoperative Electrophysiological Recording: Cohort Study and Review of the Literature
Neurospine. 2022;19(1):118-132.   Published online March 31, 2022
Close
Objective
To evaluate how multimodal intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) changes during spinal ependymoma (SE) resection correlate with long-term neuro-functional outcomes.
Methods
A retrospective analysis of patients aged 18 years or older who underwent surgical resection for SE over a 10-year period was conducted. IONM changes were defined as sustained transcranial motor evoked potential (TcMEP) and/or somatosensory evoked potential (SSEP) signal decrease of 50% or greater from baseline. Primary endpoints were postoperative modified McCormick Neurologic Scale (MNS) scores at postoperative day (POD) < 2, 6 weeks, 1 year, and 2 years. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed.
Results
Twenty-nine patients were identified. Average age was 44.2 ± 15.4 years. Sixteen (55.2%) were male and 13 (44.8%) were female. Tumor location was 10 cervical-predominant (34.5%), 13 thoracic-predominant (44.8%), and 6 lumbar/conus-predominant (20.7%). A majority (69.0%) were World Health Organization grade 2 tumors. Twentyfour patients (82.8%) achieved gross total resection. Thirteen patients (44.8%) had a sustained documented IONM signal change and 10 (34.5%) had a TcMEP change with or without derangement in SSEP. At POD < 2, 6 weeks, 1 year, and 2 years, MNS was significantly higher for those when analyzing subgroups with either any sustained IONM or TcMEP ± SSEP signal attenuation > 50% below baseline (all p < 0.05).
Conclusion
Sustained IONM derangements > 50% below baseline, particularly for TcMEP, are significantly associated with higher MNS postoperatively out to 2 years. Intraoperative and postoperative management of these patients warrant special consideration to limit neurologic morbidity.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  Crossref logo
  • Outcomes of initially chosen non-operative management for spinal ependymoma
    Guang-Hao Zheng, Yao-Wu Zhang, Kai Ji, Hui Qiao, Xiao Wu, Yi-Xiang Liu, Wei-Hao Liu, Bo Wang, Chong Wang, Xing-Yu Liu, Yong-Zhi Wang, Wen-Qing Jia
    Journal of Clinical Neuroscience.2026; 144: 111780.     CrossRef
  • Survival of pediatric patients with ependymoma in a tertiary cancer center in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
    Gabriela Oigman, Yung Gonzaga, Marcio Christiani, Denise Magalhaes, Veronica Moreira, Diana S. Osorio, Sima Ferman
    Frontiers in Oncology.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Results of surgical treatment of spinal cord ependymomas
    A. V. Gorodnina, A. V. Kudziev, A. S. Nazarov, E. A. Akhmedov, Yu. V. Beliakov, A. V. Ivanenko, G. A. Asaturyan, A. Yu. Orlov
    Russian Neurosurgical Journal named after Professor A. L. Polenov.2024; 16(3): 26.     CrossRef
  • Predictors of Progression-Free Survival in Patients With Spinal Intramedullary Ependymoma: A Multicenter Retrospective Study by the Neurospinal Society of Japan
    Kentaro Naito, Daisuke Umebayashi, Ryu Kurokawa, Toshiki Endo, Masaki Mizuno, Minoru Hoshimaru, Phyo Kim, Kazutoshi Hida, Toshihiro Takami
    Neurosurgery.2023; 93(5): 1046.     CrossRef
  • 9,533 View
  • 223 Download
  • 3 Web of Science
  • 4 Crossref

Review Article

Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:

Include:

Intraoperative Neuromonitoring During Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion
Neurospine. 2021;18(3):430-436.   Published online September 30, 2021
Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:
Include:
Intraoperative Neuromonitoring During Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion
Neurospine. 2021;18(3):430-436.   Published online September 30, 2021
Close
Objective
To review the evidence for the use of electromyography (EMG), motor-evoked potentials (MEPs), and somatosensory-evoked potentials (SSEPs) intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) strategies during lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF), as well as discuss the limitations associated with each technique.
Methods
A comprehensive review of the literature and compilation of findings relating to clinical studies investigating the efficacy of EMG, MEP, SSEP, or combined IONM strategies during LLIF.
Results
The evidence for the use of EMG is mixed with some studies demonstrating the efficacy of EMG in preventing postoperative neurologic injuries and other studies demonstrating a high rate of postoperative neurologic deficits with EMG monitoring. Multimodal IONM strategies utilizing MEPs or saphenous SSEPs to monitor the lumbar plexus may be promising strategies based on results from a limited number of studies.
Conclusion
The use of traditional EMG during LLIF remains without consensus. There is a growing body of evidence utilizing multimodal IONM with MEPs or saphenous SSEPs demonstrating a possible decrease in postoperative neurologic injuries after LLIF. Future prospective studies, with clear definitions of neurologic injury, that evaluate different multimodal IONM strategies are needed to better assess the efficacy of IONM during LLIF.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  Crossref logo
  • Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion: An Update on Motor Deficits in 1000 Patients Across Two Decades
    Marco D. Burkhard, Charlotte Jones, Simon Ortiz, Torben Stepan, Bryce Demopoulos, Bruno Verna, Ali E. Guven, Anna-Maria Mielke, Jennifer Shue, Federico P. Girardi, Frank P. Cammisa, Andrew A. Sama, Alexander P. Hughes
    Global Spine Journal.2026;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Utility of intraoperative neuromonitoring changes in predicting postoperative neurologic deficit in lateral lumbar interbody fusion: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Prasuna Velur, Vibha Velur, Marvin Gong
    Journal of Clinical Neuroscience.2026; 151: 112039.     CrossRef
  • A Global Survey on Intra-operative Neuromonitoring (IONM) Practices, Attitudes Towards Its Use, and Barriers Among Spine Surgeons
    Sameh Abolfotouh, Mason Alnouri, Stephen Lewis, Krishna Kumar, Mostafa A. Abolfotouh
    Global Spine Journal.2026;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Anesthetic Considerations and Management of Spine Surgery Performed Under Neuraxial Anesthesia
    Marc A. Buren, Hemra Cil
    Current Anesthesiology Reports.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Optimizing Single-Position Prone Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion with Exoscopic Technology: A Review of Key Innovations
    Christian Quinones, John Preston Wilson, Deepak Kumbhare, Bharat Guthikonda, Stanley Hoang
    Journal of Clinical Medicine.2025; 14(4): 1132.     CrossRef
  • Safety and Feasibility of Transabdominal Muscle Action Potential Monitoring in Lateral Lumbar Surgery
    Kaveh Khajavi, Jim Youssef, Robert K. Eastlack, Jeffrey R. Balzer, Greg Niznik, William Smith
    World Neurosurgery.2025; 197: 123878.     CrossRef
  • Advanced neuromonitoring in lateral surgery – The role of transabdominal muscle action potential
    Michael R. McDermott, Alfred-John Bayaton, Dane Wheeler, Ashish Patel
    Seminars in Spine Surgery.2025; : 101178.     CrossRef
  • Complication avoidance in prone single-position lateral spine surgery: Strategies and best practice
    Bryan J. Heard, Scott Mallozzi, Michael H Weber, Isaac L. Moss, Hardeep Singh
    Seminars in Spine Surgery.2025; : 101180.     CrossRef
  • The future of intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) in spinal surgery
    W. Bryan Wilent, Marcia-Ruth Ndege, Adam Doan
    North American Spine Society Journal (NASSJ).2025; 24: 100777.     CrossRef
  • Impact of Intraoperative Neuromonitoring Alert Resolution on Motor Deficits and Short-Term Outcomes After Spine Fusion
    Jarod Olson, Jonathan F. Dalton, Brandon Martinazzi, Alec Giakas, Yulia Lee, Joshua Mathew, Rajkishen Narayanan, Omar Tarawneh, Robert J. Oris, Chloe Herczeg, Joydeep Baidya, Rachel Huang, Mitchell Ng, Gregorio Baek, William A. Green, Yasmine Eichbaum, Mo
    Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Single Position Prone Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Review of the Current Literature
    Freddy P. Jacome, Justin J. Lee, David M. Hiltzik, Sia Cho, Manasa Pagadala, Wellington K. Hsu
    Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine.2024; 17(9): 386.     CrossRef
  • Management of Refractory Post-operative Osteomyelitis and Discitis: A Case Report
    Chase A DeLong, Malek Bashti, Long Di, Sumedh S Shah, Emade Jaman, Gregory W Basil
    Cureus.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Feasibility of Saphenous Nerve Somatosensory-Evoked Potential Intraoperative Monitoring During Lumbar Spine Surgery
    Sydney Rucker, Nishtha Singh, Eric Mai, Tomoyuki Asada, Pratyush Shahi, Kristin Mercado, Dora Leung, Sravisht Iyer, Ronald Emerson, Sheeraz A. Qureshi
    Spine.2024; 49(13): 923.     CrossRef
  • The Improvement of Intraoperative Motor Evoked Potential after Decompression in Cervical Compressive Myelopathy: Its Significance and Related Factors
    Jong Yun Kwon, Dong Hwan Kim, Kyoung Hyup Nam, Byung Kwan Choi, In Ho Han
    The Nerve.2024; 10(2): 80.     CrossRef
  • Long-Term Motor versus Sensory Lumbar Plexopathy After Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Single-Center Experience, Intraoperative Neuromonitoring Results, and Multivariate Analysis of Patient-Level Predictors
    Bryan Zheng, Owen P. Leary, Robert A. Beer, David D. Liu, Sarah Nuss, Adriel Barrios-Anderson, Spencer Darveau, Sohail Syed, Ziya L. Gokaslan, Albert E. Telfeian, Adetokunbo A. Oyelese, Jared S. Fridley
    World Neurosurgery.2023; 170: e568.     CrossRef
  • The Prone Lateral Approach for Lumbar Fusion—A Review of the Literature and Case Series
    Gal Barkay, Ian Wellington, Scott Mallozzi, Hardeep Singh, Isaac L. Moss
    Medicina.2023; 59(2): 251.     CrossRef
  • Imaging study of the effect of postural changes on the retroperitoneal oblique corridor in degenerative lumbar scoliosis
    Wei Yang, Zecheng Cai, Xiaoyin Liu, Wenqi Yuan, Rong Ma, Zhen Chen, Jianqun Zhang, Peng Wu, Zhaohui Ge
    European Spine Journal.2023; 32(10): 3659.     CrossRef
  • Surgical treatment of spondylolisthesis by oblique lumbar interbody fusion and transpedicular screw fixation: Comparison between conventional double position versus navigation-assisted single lateral position
    Junghoon Han, Chang-Min Ha, Woon Tak Yuh, Young San Ko, Jun-Hoe Kim, Tae-Shin Kim, Chang-Hyun Lee, Sungjoon Lee, Sun-Ho Lee, Asfandyar Khan, Chun Kee Chung, Chi Heon Kim, Mohamed El-Sayed Abdel-Wanis
    PLOS ONE.2023; 18(9): e0291114.     CrossRef
  • Three-column reconstruction through the posterior approach alone for the treatment of a severe lumbar burst fracture: a case report
    Woo Seok Kim, Tae Seok Jeong, Woo Kyung Kim
    Journal of Trauma and Injury.2023; 36(3): 290.     CrossRef
  • Female Sex and Supine Proximal Lumbar Lordosis Are Associated With the Size of the LLIF “Safe Zone” at L4-L5
    Mitchell S. Fourman, Ram K. Alluri, J. Manuel Sarmiento, Keith W. Lyons, Francis C. Lovecchio, Kasra Araghi, Sidhant S. Dalal, Daniel J. Shinn, Junho Song, Pratyush Shahi, Dimitra Melissaridou, John A. Carrino, Evan D. Sheha, Sravisht Iyer, James E. Dowde
    Spine.2023; 48(22): 1606.     CrossRef
  • Neuromonitoring in Lateral Approaches for Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Systematic Review
    James W. Nie, Timothy J. Hartman, Eileen Zheng, Keith R. MacGregor, Omolabake O. Oyetayo, Kern Singh
    World Neurosurgery.2022; 168: 268.     CrossRef
  • Impact of preoperative symptom duration in patients undergoing lateral lumbar interbody fusion
    James W. Nie, Timothy J. Hartman, Omolabake O. Oyetayo, Keith R. MacGregor, Eileen Zheng, Alexander W. Parsons, Dustin H. Massel, Arash J. Sarari, Kern Singh
    Acta Neurochirurgica.2022; 165(1): 89.     CrossRef
  • Histological and Morphometric Changes in the Femoral Nerve During Lateral Interbody Fusion of the Lumbar Spine: Experimental Study
    Tatiana N. Varsegova, Olga V. Diuriagina, Nikolai I. Antonov, Sergey O. Ryabykh
    Traumatology and Orthopedics of Russia.2021; 27(4): 82.     CrossRef
  • 18,747 View
  • 341 Download
  • 25 Web of Science
  • 23 Crossref

Clinical Article

Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:

Include:

The Applicability of Intraoperative Neuromonitoring in Patients with Preoperative Motor Weakness during Spine Surgery
Korean J Spine. 2016;13(1):9-12.   Published online March 31, 2016
Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:
Include:
The Applicability of Intraoperative Neuromonitoring in Patients with Preoperative Motor Weakness during Spine Surgery
Korean J Spine. 2016;13(1):9-12.   Published online March 31, 2016
Close
Objective

The purpose of our study is to evaluate the success rate and feasibility of intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) focusing on transcranial motor evoked potential (TcMEP) monitoring for patients with preoperative motor weakness in spine surgery.

Methods

Between November 2011 and December 2013, TcMEP and somatosensory evoked potential (SSEP) monitoring were attempted in 130 consecutive patients undergoing spine surgeries for cervical or thoracic cord lesions. Patients ranged in age from 14 to 81 years (mean±standard deviation, 56.7±14.8 years), and 84 patients were male. The success rates of both SSEP and MEPs monitoring were assessed according to the preoperative Medical Research Council (MRC) and Nurick grades.

Results

TcMEP was recorded successfully in 0%, 28.6%, 72.3%, and 100% of patients with MRC grades 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5, respectively. SSEP was obtained from 0%, 37.5%, 21.5%, 61.4%, and 85.4% of patients with MRC grades 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5, respectively. TcMEP was recorded successfully in 84% of patients with Nurick grades 1-3 and 26% of patients with Nurick grades 4-5. SSEPs were recorded successfully in 76.3% of patients with Nurick grades 1-3 and 24% of patients with grades 4-5.

Conclusion

IONM during spine surgery may be useless in patients with MRC grades 1-2, applicable MRC grade 3, and useful MRC grades 4-5. MRC grade 3 is a critical point of indication for application of MEPs. In unmonitorable cases with MRC grade 3, increasing stimulus intensity or facilitation techniques may be considered to improve the usefulness of TcMEP.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  Crossref logo
  • Safety and Feasibility of Transabdominal Muscle Action Potential Monitoring in Lateral Lumbar Surgery
    Kaveh Khajavi, Jim Youssef, Robert K. Eastlack, Jeffrey R. Balzer, Greg Niznik, William Smith
    World Neurosurgery.2025; 197: 123878.     CrossRef
  • A novel technique to differentiate positional loss of motor function of the spinal cord from failure to obtain baseline transcranial motor evoked potential (TcMEP) in patients with pre-operative motor deficit
    Uditi Gupta, Heena Parihar, Ashok Kumar Jaryal, Megha Bir, Bhavuk Garg, Parin Lalwani
    Neurophysiologie Clinique.2025; 55(6): 103107.     CrossRef
  • Facilitation of motor evoked potentials after tetanic peripheral nerve stimulation
    Zaman Wehab, Michael W. Lutz, Emily P. Bell, Holly E. Johnson, Mohanad AlGaeed, Aatif M. Husain
    Clinical Neurophysiology.2024; 162: 2.     CrossRef
  • Monitoring Transcranial Motor-Evoked Potentials in Charcot–Marie–Tooth Disease: A Case Report
    Muhammed Ajmal, Priyanka Pavithran, Pramod Sudarshan
    Indian Spine Journal.2024; 7(2): 213.     CrossRef
  • The Improvement of Intraoperative Motor Evoked Potential after Decompression in Cervical Compressive Myelopathy: Its Significance and Related Factors
    Jong Yun Kwon, Dong Hwan Kim, Kyoung Hyup Nam, Byung Kwan Choi, In Ho Han
    The Nerve.2024; 10(2): 80.     CrossRef
  • Patient Factors Impacting Baseline Motor Evoked Potentials (MEPs) in Patients Undergoing Cervical Spine Surgery for Myelopathy or Radiculopathy
    Stephen DiMaria, W. Bryan Wilent, Kristen J. Nicholson, Eric A. Tesdahl, Kornelija Valiuskyte, Jennifer Mao, Philip Seger, Akash Singh, Anthony K. Sestokas, Alex R. Vaccaro
    Clinical Spine Surgery.2022; 35(6): E527.     CrossRef
  • Successful Motor Evoked Potential Monitoring in Cervical Myelopathy : Related Factors and the Effect of Increased Stimulation Intensity
    Hyok Ki Shim, Jae Meen Lee, Dong Hwan Kim, Kyoung Hyup Nam, Byung Kwan Choi, In Ho Han
    Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society.2021; 64(1): 78.     CrossRef
  • Reliability of Intraoperative Monitoring in Patients with a Preexisting Motor Deficit: Case Report and Literature Review
    Ravindran Visagan, José Pedro Lavrador, Shami Acharya, Noemia Pereira, Istvan Bodi, Keyoumars Ashkan, Ranjeev Bhangoo, F. Vergani
    Journal of Neurological Surgery Part A: Central European Neurosurgery.2021; 82(04): 387.     CrossRef
  • Feasibility of Using Intraoperative Neuromonitoring in the Prophylaxis of Dysesthesia in Transforaminal Endoscopic Discectomies of the Lumbar Spine
    Paulo Sérgio Teixeira de Carvalho, Max Rogério Freitas Ramos, Alcy Caio da Silva Meireles, Alexandre Peixoto, Paulo de Carvalho, Jorge Felipe Ramírez León, Anthony Yeung, Kai-Uwe Lewandrowski
    Brain Sciences.2020; 10(8): 522.     CrossRef
  • Comparison of intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring outcomes between cervical and thoracic spine surgery
    Shujie Wang, Yuan Tian, Xiangquan Lin, Zhifu Ren, Yu Zhao, Jiliang Zhai, Xiaojuan Zhang, Yanwei Zhao, Yingyue Dong, Congran Zhao, Ye Tian
    European Spine Journal.2017; 26(9): 2404.     CrossRef
  • Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring for Spinal Cord Tumor Surgery: Comparison of Motor and Somatosensory Evoked Potentials According to Tumor Types
    Taeha Park, Jinyoung Park, Yoon Ghil Park, Joowon Lee
    Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine.2017; 41(4): 610.     CrossRef
  • 10,178 View
  • 98 Download
  • 11 Crossref