4. Parker SL, Godil SS, Mendenhall SK, et al. Two-year comprehensive medical management of degenerative lumbar spine disease (lumbar spondylolisthesis, stenosis, or disc herniation): a value analysis of cost, pain, disability, and quality of life: clinical article. J Neurosurg Spine 2014;21:143-9.
6. Kalff R, Ewald C, Waschke A, et al. Degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis in older people: current treatment options. Dtsch Arztebl Int 2013;110:613-23. quiz 624.
8. Koc Z, Ozcakir S, Sivrioglu K, et al. Effectiveness of physical therapy and epidural steroid injections in lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2009;34:985-9.
9. Mazanec DJ, Podichetty VK, Hsia A. Lumbar canal stenosis: start with nonsurgical therapy. Cleve Clin J Med 2002;69:909-17.
10. Theodoridis T, Krämer J, Kleinert H. Conservative treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis--a review. Z Orthop Unfall 2008;146:75-9.
13. Ma XL, Zhao XW, Ma JX, et al. Effectiveness of surgery versus conservative treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis: a system review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Int J Surg 2017;44:329-38.
14. Amundsen T, Weber H, Nordal HJ, et al. Lumbar spinal stenosis: conservative or surgical management?: a prospective 10-year study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2000;25:1424-35. discussion 1435-6.
15. Weber C, Giannadakis C, Rao V, et al. Is there an association between radiological severity of lumbar spinal stenosis and disability, pain, or surgical outcome? A multicenter observational study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2016;41:E78-83.
17. Malmivaara A, Slätis P, Heliövaara M, et al. Surgical or nonoperative treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis? A randomized controlled trial. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2007;32:1-8.
18. Hu ZJ, Fang XQ, Zhou ZJ, et al. Effect and possible mechanism of muscle-splitting approach on multifidus muscle injury and atrophy after posterior lumbar spine surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2013;95:e192.
19. Fritsch EW, Heisel J, Rupp S. The failed back surgery syndrome: reasons, intraoperative findings, and long-term results: a report of 182 operative treatments. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1996;21:626-33.
21. Arai Y, Hirai T, Yoshii T, et al. A prospective comparative study of 2 minimally invasive decompression procedures for lumbar spinal canal stenosis: unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression (ULBD) versus muscle-preserving interlaminar decompression (MILD). Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2014;39:332-40.
22. Min WK, Kim JE, Choi DJ, et al. Clinical and radiological outcomes between biportal endoscopic decompression and microscopic decompression in lumbar spinal stenosis. J Orthop Sci 2020;25:371-8.
23. Mobbs RJ, Li J, Sivabalan P, et al. Outcomes after decompressive laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis: comparison between minimally invasive unilateral laminectomy for bilateral decompression and open laminectomy: clinical article. J Neurosurg Spine 2014;21:179-86.
24. Benoist M, Ficat C, Baraf P, et al. Postoperative sciatica from epidural fibrosis and lumbar arachnoiditis. Results of 38 repeat operations. Rev Rhum Mal Osteoartic 1979;46:593-9.
26. Thomé C, Zevgaridis D, Leheta O, et al. Outcome after lessinvasive decompression of lumbar spinal stenosis: a randomized comparison of unilateral laminotomy, bilateral laminotomy, and laminectomy. J Neurosurg Spine 2005;3:129-41.
27. Soliman HM. Irrigation endoscopic decompressive laminotomy. A new endoscopic approach for spinal stenosis decompression. Spine J 2015;15:2282-9.
28. Li C, Ju F, Li W, et al. Efficacy and safety of unilateral biportal endoscopy compared with microscopic decompression in the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis: a protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore) 2021;100:e27970.
29. Liang J, Lian L, Liang S, et al. Efficacy and complications of unilateral biportal endoscopic spinal surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis: a meta-analysis and systematic review. World Neurosurg 2022;159:e91-102.
31. Perez-Roman RJ, Gaztanaga W, Lu VM, et al. Endoscopic decompression for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. J Neurosurg Spine 2021;36:549-57.
32. Pranata R, Lim MA, Vania R, et al. Biportal endoscopic spinal surgery versus microscopic decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World Neurosurg 2020;138:e450-8.
33. Lin GX, Hu BS, Rui G. Letter to the editor regarding “Full endoscopic (bi portal or uni portal) versus microscopic lumbar decompression laminectomy in patients with spinal stenosis: systematic review and meta analysis”. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 2022 Jan 15
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-021-03177-9. [Epub].
34. Lin GX, Rui G, Jhang SW, et al. Letter to the editor regarding “biportal endoscopic spinal surgery versus microscopic decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis”. World Neurosurg 2022;157:248.
35. Higgins JPT, Thomas J, Chandler J, et al. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 6.2 (updated February 2021) Cochrane. 2021;Available from
www.training.cochrane.org/handbook.
38. Higgins JP, Thompson SG. Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat Med 2002;21:1539-58.
40. Doi SA, Furuya-Kanamori L, Xu C, et al. Controversy and debate: questionable utility of the relative risk in clinical research: Paper 1: a call for change to practice. J Clin Epidemiol 2022;142:271-9.
41. Begg CB, Mazumdar M. Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias. Biometrics 1994;50:1088-101.
43. Chaimani A, Mavridis D, Salanti G. A hands-on practical tutorial on performing meta-analysis with Stata. Evid Based Ment Health 2014;17:111-6.
46. Aygun H, Abdulshafi K. Unilateral biportal endoscopy versus tubular microendoscopy in management of single level degenerative lumbar canal stenosis: a prospective study. Clin Spine Surg 2021;34:E323-8.
47. Chen K, Pan HS, Huang MF, et al. Comparative effect of transforaminal endoscopic spine system versus micro endoscopic discectomy for the treatment of lumbar spinal lateral recess stenosis. Chin J Pain Med 2018;24:229-34.
48. Kang T, Park SY, Kang CH, et al. Is biportal technique/endoscopic spinal surgery satisfactory for lumbar spinal stenosis patients? A prospective randomized comparative study. Medicine (Baltimore) 2019;98:e15451.
49. Komp M, Hahn P, Oezdemir S, et al. Bilateral spinal decompression of lumbar central stenosis with the full-endoscopic interlaminar versus microsurgical laminotomy technique: a prospective, randomized, controlled study. Pain Physician 2015;18:61-70.
50. Park SM, Park J, Jang HS, et al. Biportal endoscopic versus microscopic lumbar decompressive laminectomy in patients with spinal stenosis: a randomized controlled trial. Spine J 2020;20:156-65.
51. Ruetten S, Komp M, Merk H, et al. Surgical treatment for lumbar lateral recess stenosis with the full-endoscopic interlaminar approach versus conventional microsurgical technique: a prospective, randomized, controlled study. J Neurosurg Spine 2009;10:476-85.
52. Heo DH, Lee DC, Park CK. Comparative analysis of three types of minimally invasive decompressive surgery for lumbar central stenosis: biportal endoscopy, uniportal endoscopy, and microsurgery. Neurosurg Focus 2019;46:E9.
53. Heo DH, Quillo-Olvera J, Park CK. Can percutaneous biportal endoscopic surgery achieve enough canal decompression for degenerative lumbar stenosis? Prospective casecontrol study. World Neurosurg 2018;120:e684-9.