1. Ozgur BM, Aryan HE, Pimenta L, et al. Extreme lateral interbody fusion (XLIF): a novel surgical technique for anterior lumbar interbody fusion. Spine J 2006 6:435-43.
2. Youssef JA, McAfee PC, Patty CA, et al. Minimally invasive surgery: lateral approach interbody fusion: results and review. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2010 35(26 Suppl):S302-11.
3. Oliveira L, Marchi L, Coutinho E, et al. A radiographic assessment of the ability of the extreme lateral interbody fusion procedure to indirectly decompress the neural elements. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2010 35(26 Suppl):S331-7.
4. Laws CJ, Coughlin DG, Lotz JC, et al. Direct lateral approach to lumbar fusion is a biomechanically equivalent alternative to the anterior approach: an in vitro study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2012 37:819-25.
5. Ploumis A, Wu C, Fischer G, et al. Biomechanical comparison of anterior lumbar interbody fusion and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. J Spinal Disord Tech 2008 21:120-5.
6. Ahmadian A, Deukmedjian AR, Abel N, et al. Analysis of lumbar plexopathies and nerve injury after lateral retroperitoneal transpsoas approach: diagnostic standardization. J Neurosurg Spine 2013 18:289-97.
7. Arnold P, Anderson K, McGuire R. The lateral transpsoas approach to the lumbar and thoracic spine: a review. Surg Neurol Int 2012 3(Suppl 3):198-215.
8. Pumberger M, Hughes AP, Huang RC, et al. Neurologic deficit following lateral lumbar interbody fusion. Eur Spine J 2012 21:1192-9.
9. Isaacs RE, Hyde J, Goodrich JA, et al. A prospective, nonrandomized, multicenter evaluation of extreme lateral interbody fusion for the treatment of adult degenerative scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2010 35(26 Suppl):S322-30.
10. Sofianos DA, Briseño MR, Abrams J, et al. Complications of the lateral transpsoas approach for lumbar interbody arthrodesis: a case series and literature review. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2012 470:1621-32.
11. Cahill KS, Martinez JL, Wang MY, et al. Motor nerve injuries following the minimally invasive lateral transpsoas approach. J Neurosurg Spine 2012 17:227-31.
12. Sharma AK, Kepler CK, Girardi FP, et al. Lateral lumbar interbody fusion: clinical and radiographic outcomes at 1 year: a preliminary report. J Spinal Disord 2011 24:242-50.
13. Moller DJ, Slimack NP, Acosta FL, et al. Minimally invasive lateral lumbar interbody fusion and transpsoas approach–related morbidity. Neurosurg Focus 2011 31:E4.
14. Regev GJ, Chen L, Dhawan M, et al. Morphometric analysis of the ventral nerve roots and retroperitoneal vessels with respect to the minimally invasive lateral approach in normal and deformed spines. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2009 34:1330-5.
15. Uribe JS, Arredondo N, Dakwar E, et al. Defining the safe working zones using the minimally invasive lateral retroperitoneal transpsoas approach: an anatomical study. J Neurosurg Spine 2010 13:260-6.
16. Mandelli C, Colombo EV, Sicuri PM, et al. Lumbar plexus nervous distortion in XLIF
® approach: an anatomic study. Eur Spine J 2016 25:4155-63.
17. Moro T, Kikuchi S, Konoo S, et al. An anatomic study of the lumbar plexus with respect to retroperitoneal endoscopic surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2003 28:423-8.
18. Davis TT, Bae HW, Mok JM, et al. Lumbar plexus anatomy within the psoas muscle: implications for the transpsoas lateral approach to the L4-L5 disc. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2011 93:1482-7.
19. Tohmeh AG, Rodgers WB, Peterson MD. Dynamically evoked, discrete-threshold electromyography in the extreme lateral interbody fusion approach. J Neurosurg Spine 2011 14:31-7.
20. Uribe JS, Isaacs RE, Youssef JA, et al. Can triggered electromyography monitoring throughout retraction predict postoperative symptomatic neuropraxia after XLIF? Results from a prospective multicenter trial. Eur Spine J 2015 24(Suppl 3):S378-85.
21. Bendersky M, Solá C, Muntadas J, et al. Monitoring lumbar plexus integrity in extreme lateral transpsoas approaches to the lumbar spine: a new protocol with anatomical bases. Eur Spine J 2015 24:1051-7.
22. Narita W, Takatori R, Arai Y, et al. Prevention of neurological complications using a neural monitoring system with a finger electrode in the extreme lateral interbody fusion approach. J Neurosurg Spine 2016 25:456-63.
24. Benglis DM, Vanni S, Levi AD. An anatomical study of the lumbosacral plexus as related to the minimally invasive transpsoas approach to the lumbar spine. J Neurosurg Spine 2009 10:139-44.
25. Houten JK, Alexandre LC, Nasser R, et al. Nerve injury during the transpsoas approach for lumbar fusion. J Neurosurg Spine 2011 15:280-4.
26. Sarwahi V, Pawar A, Sugarman E, et al. Triggered EMG potentials in determining neuroanatomical safe zone for transpsoas lumbar approach: are they reliable? Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2016 41:E647-53.
27. Nichols GS, Manafov E. Utility of electromyography for nerve root monitoring during spinal surgery. J Clin Neurophysiol 2012 29:140-8.
28. Lyon R, Lieberman JA, Feiner J, et al. Relative efficacy of transcranial motor evoked potentials, mechanically-elicited electromyography, and evoked EMG to assess nerve root function during sustained retraction in a porcine model. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2009 34:E558-64.
29. Cummock MD, Vanni S, Levi AD, et al. An analysis of postoperative thigh symptoms after minimally invasive transpsoas lumbar interbody fusion. J Neurosurg Spine 2011 15:11-8.
30. Silverstein J, Mermelstein L, De Wal H, et al. Saphenous nerve somatosensory evoked potentials: a novel technique to monitor the femoral nerve during transpoas lumbar lateral interbody fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2014 39:1254-60.
31. Block J, Silverstein J. The utility of transcranial motor evoked potentials (MEPs) for intraoperative monitoring of femoral nerve function for retroperitoneal transpsoas access to the spine. Neurodiagn J 2014 54:356.
32. Jahangiri FR, Holmberg A, Vega-Bermudez F, et al. Preventing position-related brachial plexus injury with intraoperative somatosensory evoked potentials and transcranial electrical motor evoked potentials during anterior cervical spine surgery. Am J Electroneurodiagnostic Technol 2011 51:198-205.
33. Riley MR, Doan AT, Vogel RW, et al. Use of motor evoked potentials during lateral lumbar interbody fusion reduces postoperative deficits. Spine J 2018 18:1763-78.
34. Berends HI, Journée HL, Rácz I, et al. Multimodality intraoperative neuromonitoring in extreme lateral interbody fusion. Transcranial electrical stimulation as indispensable rearview. Eur Spine J 2016 25:1581-6.
35. Chaudhary K, Speights K, McGuire K, et al. Trans-cranial motor evoked potential detection of femoral nerve injury in trans-psoas lateral lumbar interbody fusion. J Clin Monit Comput 2015 29:549-54.
36. Duncan JW, Bailey RA, Baena R. Intraoperative decrease in amplitude of somatosensory-evoked potentials of the lower extremities with interbody fusion cage placement during lumbar fusion surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2012 37:E1290-5.
37. Jain N, Alluri R, Phan K, et al. Saphenous nerve somatosensory-evoked potentials monitoring during lateral interbody fusion. Global Spine J 2021 11:722-6.