Warning: mkdir(): Permission denied in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 81 Warning: fopen(/home/virtual/e-kjs/journal/upload/ip_log/ip_log_2022-06.txt): failed to open stream: No such file or directory in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 83 Warning: fwrite() expects parameter 1 to be resource, boolean given in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 84 Commentary on “Frailty Status Is a More Robust Predictor Than Age of Spinal Tumor Surgery Outcomes: A NSQIP Analysis of 4,662 Patients”

Commentary on “Frailty Status Is a More Robust Predictor Than Age of Spinal Tumor Surgery Outcomes: A NSQIP Analysis of 4,662 Patients”

Article information

Neurospine. 2022;19(1):63-64
Publication date (electronic) : 2022 March 31
doi : https://doi.org/10.14245/ns.2244110.055
Department of Neurosurgery, Neuroscience and Radiosurgery Hybrid Research Center, Inje University College of Medicine, Goyang, Korea
Corresponding Author Moon-Jun Sohn https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1796-766X Department of Neurosurgery, Neuroscience & Radiosurgery Hybrid Research Center, Inje University Ilsan Paik Hospital, College of Medicine, 170 Juhwaro Ilsanseo-gu, Goyang 10380, Korea Email: mjsohn@paik.ac.kr

This study [1] revealed that the modified frailty index-5 (mFI-5) score which is a predictor of postoperative morbidity that can evaluate frailty rather than age, is a stronger feature through typical analysis method of risk factors for outcomes after spinal tumor surgery. Specifically, the mortality, major complication, unplanned readmission, reoperation, hospital length of stay, and discharge destination, which parameterized patient demographic and clinical characteristics for age and mFI-5 score using the odds ratio to provide a quantitative comparison and confidence interval analysis are very appropriate. Although there seems to be limitations in analyzing only age and mFI-5 as major predictors of surgery for spinal tumors, it is possible to analyze more detailed risk factors using the pre- and postoperative clinical characteristics of patients presented in Table 3. For example, age, frailty score, preoperative clinical value, and postoperative complications can be examples of how to find factors that influence and contribute to surgical outcome [2-4].

The preoperative prognostic factor tools such as this study are valuable research data that can be clinically useful [2-4]. There is a method of estimating the importance of each factor that contributed to the output of an artificial intelligence model modeled by using a recently explainable artificial intelligence technique as the average value of the entire dataset, or finding the significance of cases in individual datasets [5]. In this study, area under the curve and receiver operating characteristic of univariate and multivariate models were statistically analyzed, but extended analysis is possible with metrics such as confusion matrix, precision, and recall that compare the predicted results of the artificial intelligence model with the actual values. For this analysis, the number of datasets (n= 4,662) used in the current analysis may need to be expanded further. Also, categorical manipulation may be necessary if the dataset to be used for input is a continuous variable. The dataset from this study could be an excellent source for another research topic.

Notes

Conflict of Interest

The author has nothing to disclose.

References

1. Kazim SF, Dicpinigaitis AJ, Bowers CA, et al. Frailty status is a more robust predictor than age of spinal tumor surgery outcomes: a NSQIP analysis of 4,662 patients. Neurospine 2022;19:53–62.
2. Perez-Roman RJ, McCarthy D, Luther EM, et al. Effects of body mass index on perioperative outcomes in patients undergoing anterior cervical discectomy and fusion surgery. Neurospine 2021;18:79–86.
3. Rangari K, Das KK, Singh S, et al. Type I Chiari malformation without concomitant bony instability: assessment of different surgical procedures and outcomes in 73 patients. Neurospine 2021;18:126–38.
4. Yoo JS, Jenkins NW, Parrish JM, et al. Evaluation of postoperative mental health outcomes in patients based on patient-reported outcome measurement information system physical function following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. Neurospine 2020;17:184–9.
5. Khan O, Badhiwala JH, Wilson JRF, et al. Predictive modeling of outcomes after traumatic and nontraumatic spinal cord injury using machine learning: review of current progress and future directions. Neurospine 2019;16:678–85.

Article information Continued