Warning: mkdir(): Permission denied in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 81 Warning: fopen(/home/virtual/e-kjs/journal/upload/ip_log/ip_log_2024-04.txt): failed to open stream: No such file or directory in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 83 Warning: fwrite() expects parameter 1 to be resource, boolean given in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 84 Commentary to “A Review of Functional Restoration From Spinal Cord Stimulation in Patients With Spinal Cord Injury”

Commentary to “A Review of Functional Restoration From Spinal Cord Stimulation in Patients With Spinal Cord Injury”

Article information

Neurospine. 2022;19(3):735-736
Publication date (electronic) : 2022 September 30
doi : https://doi.org/10.14245/ns.2244746.373
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, USA
Corresponding Author Rex A.W. Marco Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Houston Methodist Hospital, 6550 Fannin St. Suite 2600. Houston, TX 77030, USA Email: rexmarco@gmail.com

In this systematic review, Lin et al. [1] comprehensively assess the functional restoration from spinal cord stimulation in 327 patients with chronic, traumatic spinal cord injury identified in 50 case or case-series studies and 21 clinical trials. During stimulation, an overwhelming majority of patients had improvement in sensorimotor function and autonomic genitourinary, pulmonary, and cardiovascular function. Volitional movement lasting for months in the absence of stimulation was seen in some patients. The majority of functional improvements in volitional movement were paired with intense motor training and most patients did not completely regain volitional movement. There was a 4% complication rate with autonomic dysreflexia and skin breakdown or infection reported as the most common complications.

The limitations of the current research were clearly discussed including the heterogeneity of this patient population, the varied stimulation parameters of transcutaneous and epidural spinal cord stimulation, the numerous locations of the lead placements, and the wide range of functional outcomes evaluated. The authors appropriately suggest that future studies decrease the bias in outcome measurements due to lack of control groups and lack of blinding to patients and assessors. Moreover, they encouraged multicenter studies to increase patient enrollment, as well as the development of greater programmability of the stimulators to allow determination of optimal stimulation frequency and modalities.

The functional improvement demonstrated during transcutaneous and epidural spinal cord stimulation in patients with chronic, traumatic spinal cord injury has generated tremendous excitement around the possibility of meaningful functional recovery and neuromodulation of previously “dormant” neural pathways. These findings have stimulated numerous clinical trials and industry funding to develop programmable stimulators that enable targeted spinal cord stimulation. Once these devices are deemed safe and efficacious, then regulatory clearance in Asia, Europe and the United States will allow further access to these devices so that more patients can be enrolled in more robust multicenter, clinical trials. It is probable that these studies will demonstrate that targeted, transcutaneous and epidural spinal cord stimulation will promote meaningful functional gains for patients with chronic, traumatic spinal cord injury.

Notes

Conflict of Interest

The author has nothing to disclose.

References

1. Lin A, Shaaya E, Calvert JS, et al. A review of functional restoration from spinal cord stimulation in patients with spinal cord injury. Neurospine 2022;19:703–34.

Article information Continued