Warning: mkdir(): Permission denied in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 87 Warning: chmod() expects exactly 2 parameters, 3 given in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 88 Warning: fopen(/home/virtual/e-kjs/journal/upload/ip_log/ip_log_2024-06.txt): failed to open stream: No such file or directory in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 95 Warning: fwrite() expects parameter 1 to be resource, boolean given in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 96 Weekend Admission Increases Risk of Readmissions Following Elective Cervical Spinal Fusion
Neurospine Search


Ren, Dominy, Bueno, Pasik, Markowitz, Yeshoua, Cho, Arvind, Valliani, Kim, and Cho: Weekend Admission Increases Risk of Readmissions Following Elective Cervical Spinal Fusion



The “weekend effect” occurs when patients cared for during weekends versus weekdays experience worse outcomes. But reasons for this effect are unclear, especially amongst patients undergoing elective cervical spinal fusion (ECSF). Our aim was to analyze whether index weekend admission affects 30- and 90-day readmission rates post-ECSF.


All ECSF patients > 18 years were retrospectively identified from the 2016–2018 Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project Nationwide Readmissions Database (NRD), using unique patient linkage codes and International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision codes. Patient demographics, comorbidities, and outcomes were analyzed. Univariate logistic regression analyzed primary outcomes of 30- and 90-day readmission rates in weekday or weekend groups. Multivariate regression determined the impact of complications on readmission rates.


Compared to the weekday group (n = 125,590), the weekend group (n = 1,026) held a higher percentage of Medicare/Medicaid insurance, incurred higher costs, had longer length of stay, and fewer routine home discharge (all p < 0.001). There was no difference in comorbidity burden between weekend versus weekday admissions, as measured by the Elixhauser Comorbidity Index (p = 0.527). Weekend admissions had higher 30-day (4.30% vs. 7.60%, p < 0.001) and 90-day (7.80% vs. 16.10%, p < 0.001) readmission rates, even after adjusting for sex, age, insurance status, and comorbidities. All-cause complication rates were higher for weekend admissions (8.62% vs. 12.7%, p < 0.001), specifically deep vein thrombosis, infection, neurological conditions, and pulmonary embolism.


Index weekend admission increases 30- and 90-day readmission rates after ECSF. In patients undergoing ECSF on weekends, postoperative care for patients at risk for specific complications will allow for improved outcomes and health care utilization.


Cervical spinal fusions have had increasing incidence, partly owing to the increasing elderly population and an increasing emphasis on quality-based reimbursement metrics and cost-effective solutions for degenerative spine disorders [1,2]. The estimated rate of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) and posterior cervical fusions is 50.6 per 100,000 population and is predicted to continue to increase [1]. ACDF, the most common surgery for degenerative cervical disease, has experienced increasing readmission rates [3]. As cervical spinal fusion procedures continue to rise, it is imperative that we analyze risk factors for 30- and 90-day readmission to improve patient outcomes.
Readmission rates are an excellent measure of patient outcomes since they serve as a widespread quality and reimbursement metric. Readmission is associated with higher costs making it a current focus of improvement for both the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) as well as institutions. In 2006, an estimated $41 billion were spent as a result of unplanned readmissions [4], placing significant stress on both patients and the healthcare system. Notably, the CMS and National Quality Forum use readmission rates as a metric to rate hospital performance and to determine quality-based reimbursement [5].
The “weekend effect” is a clinical phenomenon where there are more negative outcomes in patients cared for during the weekend compared to a weekday, but reasons for this effect are unclear [6,7]. Studies have found weekend admission to be associated with higher risk of mortality, cost, increased length of stay (LOS), and worse outcomes in patients undergoing spine procedures for idiopathic scoliosis [8], cervical fusion due to trauma [9], and thoracolumbar fusion [10]. However, other studies have found no association between index weekend admission and complication or mortality rates in emergent spinal cord injury patients [11]. Although risk factors for readmission in patients undergoing cervical spinal fusions have been identified [12], the day of surgery was not considered.
To our knowledge, this is the first paper to consider readmission rates in patients who were admitted on the weekend to undergo either anterior or posterior elective cervical spinal fusions (ECSF). A more contemporary analysis of specific complications and readmission rates can help elucidate the causes of different clinical outcomes associated with day of index admission. Findings may inform providers on potential methods to address causes of readmission, in the context of the weekend effect, to minimize the negative impact and costs associated with weekend admission on ECSF.
As such, the objectives of this study are to (1) compare 30- and 90-day readmission rates between weekday and weekend admission for patients undergoing ECSF and (2) identify differences in complications between the weekday vs weekend cohorts to explain differences in readmission rates.


We queried the 2016–2018 versions of the Nationwide Readmissions Database (NRD), which holds data on millions of hospital discharges in the United States (US) every year. Institutional review board exemption was obtained from our institution for this retrospective analysis. The 2016–2018 datasets use the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision (ICD-10) diagnosis and procedural codes to identify specific medical conditions and surgical procedures. The NRD contains data from 28 state inpatient databases. Sampling discharge weights are provided by the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project to allow for national estimates from the NRD. The NRD discharge data includes patient demographics, hospital characteristics, payer status, total hospital charges to patient, readmission information, and patient diagnoses and procedures.
All adult patients (> 18 years of age) who underwent ECSF were identified using ICD-10, Clinical Modification procedure codes. Procedures include both ACDF and posterior spinal fusion, and nonelective procedures were excluded based on ICD-10 codes. Patients were then separated into 2 subgroups based on whether or not their index admission was on a weekday or weekend. The NRD uses the binary variable “AWEEKEND” to identify whether an admission is on a weekend ( = 1) versus weekday (= 0), where weekend admission equates to receiving surgery on Saturday or Sunday. Patient characteristics were obtained from the NRD database including demographic information (sex and age), diagnoses, and payer type. Preoperative comorbidities were identified using ICD-10 codes and the R Comorbidity package [13]. This package allows for the calculation of the Elixhauser Comorbidity Index (ECI) as well as incidence of specific comorbidities among the patient population. Additionally, total LOS and total hospital charges were analyzed for each patient. Total hospital charges for each patient were reported by the NRD in dollar amounts; we then adjusted each charge for inflation using the consumer price index.
The NRD contains data on 14 million US hospitalizations each year, and allows for the longitudinal tracking of patients and their care as they are readmitted throughout a specific year via patient-specific identifiers within the database. However, the data is specific to year and state, so if a patient is readmitted to a different facility in a different state or if their readmission occurs after the calendar year ends, the readmission is not accounted for and could be coded as an initial admission. In order to capture 90-day readmissions, patients admitted during the last quarter of the calendar year were excluded. We were able to quantify the incidence of 30- and 90-day readmissions, the primary diagnoses associated with the 30- and 90-day readmissions, and all procedures performed during the 30- and 90- day readmissions. These analyses were performed for both the weekend-admit and weekday-admit subgroups.
SciPy version 1.6.1 (The SciPy community) was used for all statistical analyses [14]. Univariate regression analyses were performed to assess demographic differences, average total charges, and LOS between the weekend-admit and weekday-admit groups. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to analyze the association between weekend index admission and both 30- and 90-day readmission, adjusted for demographic and comorbidity factors.


1. General Patient Data

A total of 126,616 patients undergoing ECSF were identified, with 125,590 in the weekday cohort and 1,026 in the weekend cohort. Compared to the weekday group, the weekend group had a higher percentage of elderly patients over the age of 70 (p< 0.001), higher percentage of Medicare/Medicaid payor status (p< 0.001), incurred higher costs by $23,819.79 ($121,780.58 vs. $97,960.79, p < 0.001), and had longer postoperative LOS (5.27 days vs. 2.76 days, p< 0.001) (Table 1).
Patients with weekend index admissions had lower incidences of routine discharge (p < 0.001), defined as discharge to home without further required hospital care. Additionally, the weekend cohort had higher rates of discharge to home health care (HHC) (p < 0.001), skilled nursing facilities (SNFs) (p< 0.001), and intermediate care facilities (p< 0.001) (Table 1).
Weekend admitted patients had higher rates of coagulopathy (1.66% vs. 1.63%, p = 0.001) and peripheral vascular disease (4.48% vs. 2.39%, p < 0.001), but there were no differences in comorbidity burden between the 2 groups as measured by the ECI (p = 0.527) (Table 2). All-cause complication rates were higher for weekend admissions (12.7% vs. 8.62%, p < 0.001), namely deep vein thrombosis (DVT), neurological conditions, postoperative infections, and pulmonary embolism (p< 0.001) (Table 3).

2. Readmission Rates

Multiple logistical analysis was conducted to investigate the association between weekend surgery and readmission rates. The 30-day readmission rates were 4.30% on weekdays and 7.60% on weekends (odds ratio [OR], 1.82; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.44–2.30; p< 0.001). The 90-day readmission rates were 7.80% on weekdays and 16.10% on weekends (OR, 2.28; 95% CI, 1.93–2.70; p< 0.001). After adjusting for sex, age, and payor status, and comorbidities, both 30-day (OR, 1.71; 95% CI, 1.35–2.15; p< 0.001) and 90-day (OR, 2.15; 95% CI, 1.81–2.55; p< 0.001) weekend admission remained an independent risk factor for readmission (Tables 4, 5).
Common diagnosis upon 30-day readmission includes infection (7.01% weekday vs. 7.52% weekend) and sepsis (4.54% weekday vs. 6.15% weekday). Similarly, common diagnosis upon 90-day readmission includes infection (4.77% weekday vs. 5.87% weekend), sepsis (3.69% weekday vs. 6.70% weekend), and cervical spinal stenosis (6.09% weekday vs. 1.23% weekend) (Table 6).


This study is the first to demonstrate that patients with index weekend admission for both anterior and posterior ECSF procedures have increased rates of 30- and 90-day readmission, compared to patients admitted on weekdays. This relationship remains true even after controlling for demographic characteristics and comorbidities.

1. Resource Utilization and Costs

We found that weekend admitted patients incurred $23,819.79 more in total costs, but did not achieve better outcomes than weekday admissions, as assessed by higher readmission rates, longer LOS, and all-cause complications. These findings suggest that amongst weekend admission patients, higher postoperative complication rates may have led to longer LOS and therefore increased hospital costs.
Unplanned readmissions following surgery pose a significant impact on the US healthcare system, with an estimated 3.3 million 30-day all-cause readmissions resulting in an expenditure of $41 billion [4]. In elective ACDF patients, the median cost of 30- and 90-day readmissions were $6,727 and $8,507, respectively [15]. In cervical trauma patients, weekend admits incurred $11,301 more in total hospital costs than weekday admits [9]. Factors contributing to higher costs for weekend admitted ECSF patients may be due to higher LOS, as a moderately strong correlation between LOS and hospital cost has been described in joint arthroplasty patients.16 Furthermore, Adogwa et al. [17] suggests reducing LOS after ACDF can help minimize costs and optimize patient outcomes. Of note, the costs reported in this study reflect the financial burden of index admission, and did not take into account the costs of readmission. Given the financial burden of readmission events, describing the relationship between weekend index admission and possible readmission is critical for informing providers on the importance of improving weekend care to decrease the risks of readmission and the costs associated with readmission.
Comorbidities and weekend admission were found to be associated with higher hospital costs after acoustic neuroma microsurgery [18] and percutaneous coronary interventions [19]. Coagulopathy increased overall hospital costs by $3,787 in patients undergoing joint arthroplasty [20], and coagulopathy and peripheral vascular disease increased risks of infections and complications in patients undergoing spinal fusion [21,22]. In our study, the weekend ECSF cohort had significantly higher rates of coagulopathy and peripheral vascular disease comorbidities, and more thromboembolic complications. Thus, optimizing preoperative coagulation profiles and being cognizant of blood transfusion sequelae for patients with coagulopathy and peripheral vascular disease may reduce complication risks and costs – associations that can be explored in future studies under the context of the “weekend effect” in ECSF patients.
Patients with weekend admission in our study utilized more Medicare/Medicaid insurance and fewer private insurance plans than patients with weekday admission. However, multivariate analysis did not reveal payor status to be associated with higher readmission rates. Our results add evidence to previous findings that payor status were insignificant risk factors in predicting 30-day readmission rates in posterior cervical fusion patients [12]. However, our results also contradict previous findings that Medicaid status is independently associated with increased 30-day readmission after anterior cervical spine [23] and other orthopedic procedures [24]. Thus, interactions between socioeconomic status and outcomes after spinal surgeries are complex and require analysis in future studies.

2. Readmission Rates

Significant differences in the adjusted multivariate analysis of 30- and 90-day readmission following ECSF of weekend and weekday admitted patients suggest that weekend admission is an independent predictor of readmission. To our knowledge, weekend admission has only been described as a risk factor for 30-day readmission in the context of posterior cervical spine surgery and thoracolumbar spine fusion [10,12]. A study using 2014 NRD data for ACDF subjects suggest payor status, NRD, comorbidities, and LOS are significant predictors for readmission, but weekend admission was not found to be a risk factor for readmission rates [25]. Other studies identify payor status and race [26], and all-cause complications, Medicaid insurance, hospital bed size, and age [27], as predictors for high readmission rates. These papers did not consider day of the week of admission as a variable in their analysis [23,26]. Though Neifert et al. [28] found NHD and postdischarge complications to be independent predictors of readmission, they did not observe the reason for readmission in these cases. Rosenberg et al. [10] identified DVT, infections, and nonroutine discharge to be risk factors for 30-day readmission in patients with index weekend admission for thoracolumbar fusion surgery. In our ECSF cohort, the most common diagnoses upon readmission are related to postprocedural pain, infections, and surgical site complications. This further highlights the importance of preoperative medical optimization and postoperative management, concerns that should be especially scrutinized for patients admitted and receiving surgery on weekends.
Utilizing a larger and more recent NRD sample size and controlling for baseline characteristics, we found that weekend status is an independent predictor of higher 30- and 90-day readmission rates, as compared to weekday status. Thus, this study clarifies weekend status as an important preoperative variable to decrease risk of readmissions after ECSF. Furthermore, our findings suggest complications, NHD, and longer LOS are also associated with an increased risk of readmission. We therefore pose that the interactions between various factors such as hospital resources, complications, and postoperative care including discharge and LOS, can contribute to increased risk of readmission in weekend index admission patients.

3. Complications

Moreover, our study analyzed complication rates to explain differences in readmission rates between weekday and weekend admissions. The weekend admissions group experienced higher all-cause complications than the weekday admissions group, specifically DVT, neurological conditions, postoperative infections, and pulmonary embolism. These complications more frequently experienced by weekend admissions patients could partially account for their increased rates of readmission. Hospital factors that contribute to the weekend effect have been described in the literature. Overnight and postcall shifts have been associated with fewer specialists, lower nurse-to-patient ratios, and increased errors in medication orders amongst postgraduate year one physician trainees [29,30]. In our weekend cohort, there were higher rates of DVT and pulmonary embolism—complications that typically require prompt imaging tests for diagnosis. Hajibandeh et al. [27] describes decreased resources and staffing on weekends that delays diagnostics and treatment, such as imaging and pathology, which may explain why the weekend-admitted patients in our study experience higher thromboembolic events after ECSF.
We also found that the weekend cohort had an 8-fold higher incidence of postoperative infection rates compared to weekday admitted patients. Previous studies did not necessarily find an association between complication rates such as infections and weekend admission [11,31]. However, our study used a 2016–2018 national dataset to provide findings from a scoping nationallevel perspective that contributes to existing literature and highlights the need for further investigation. Future actions to mitigate postoperative wound complications leading to readmission includes rigorous methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus screening, optimizing operating room air quality, and ensuring antibiotic compliance [24]. Thus, definitively correcting such complications in the patient’s initial hospitalization prior to discharge can prevent negative clinical sequelae of those complications that may result in readmission. A study of hospital support services for critical care units found delays in blood culture incubation and processing during weekends, delaying diagnosis of sepsis and antibiotic prescriptions.32 These findings can potentially be applied to the patients in our study, where emphasis on clinical care factors such as addressing gaps in weekend staffing can help minimize complications and consequently decrease readmission rates in patients undergoing ECSF. Higher complications in weekend admitted patients may also be related to our finding that weekend patients had higher rates of discharge with HHC and SNFs. Malik et al. [33] stated that discharge to inpatient-care facilities that provide higher levels of supervised care, compared to HHC, can ensure improved outcomes following lumbar fusion. Discharge to SNFs have been associated with higher rates of complications following spine surgery [34]. Of note, our weekend admission cohort incurred higher costs, held more Medicare/Medicaid insurance types than weekday admissions, and SNFs have been found to account for approximately $31 billion of Medicare spending in 2012 [35]. Thus, decisions to discharge to costly nonhome care facilities should involve careful cost-benefit considerations. Success of home-discharge care and discharge to SNFs rely on careful patient selection, preoperative planning, and regular communication between home attendants and the patient’s physician care team [33]. However, conclusions regarding discharge destination in reducing complications following weekend ECSF should involve further analysis beyond the scope of the present study.

4. LOS and Discharge Status

In our study, LOS is significantly increased in patients who were admitted on the weekend. Previous findings identified trauma [9] and hospital acquired conditions [31] as factors that increase complications and prolong LOS in weekend ECSF patients. However, analysis of the direct impact of weekend admission on LOS following ECSF has been minimally explored, so our findings provide significant insight.
Patients admitted on the weekend were found to have increased rates of nonhome discharge (NHD), discharge with HHC, and discharge to a SNF, intermediate care facility (ICF), and other facilities. The correlation between LOS and NHD has been described as a result of lengthy precertification required for acceptance into a care facility and availability of beds [23,36]. Thus, weekend admitted patients can also consider additional coordination with these facilities prior to surgery to minimize LOS and costs. Elsamadicy et al. [23] found that patients with prolonged LOS following ACDF were more often discharged to locations other than home. However, our study is the first to provide a detailed description of discharge locations and its associations with weekend index admission, thereby raising awareness of the importance of improving NHD services, specifically SNFs, ICFs, and HHC. Previous literature have suggested that risk factors of NHD are largely nonmodifiable factors such as demographics and long term comorbidities [37,38]. Additionally, NHD can lead to a significantly increased rate of severe adverse events and death following discharge [28]. Therefore, in a population such as weekend admitted patients which is suggested to have increased risk of NHD, minimizing NHD when possible is critical. Because previous literature has suggested comorbidities as a risk factor of NHD [28], future studies looking into whether weekend admission independently leads to NHD after ECSF can help providers closely consider criteria to suggest NHD for weekday versus weekend admission patients.

5. Limitations and Further Steps

Our findings highlight that weekend surgery is an area of improvement that can decrease readmission rates after ECSF. Currently, solutions such as the redistribution of physical therapy services from weekday to weekend has served as a successful solution in improving these quality metrics and reducing cost per patient [9]. However, more research is needed to elucidate methods to improve outcomes for patients undergoing weekend surgery.
Limitations in this study include the data source, because the NRD only longitudinally tracks 49.3% of hospitalizations [25], and incomplete data can bias results. However, inclusion of data from 2016–2018 would result in a sufficient sample size, and in general these findings shed light onto the importance of weekend admission on ECSF outcomes. A meta-analysis of studies regarding readmission rates and day of surgery could address discrepancies in the literature and compare results from studies that utilize different databases. Additionally, granular data such as the number of operating room staff and turnover rate are not tracked by the NRD. However, an institutional study found that the average number of operating room personnel was 10.0 for elective neurological procedures, and staff turnover was found to be significantly correlated with increased risk for surgical site infections and operation duration [39]. Thus, future studies can investigate whether the number and turnover of personnel is a significant factor in increasing risks for readmission rates, cost, infections, NHD, and prolonged LOS following weekend ECSF. Surgical approach was not analyzed in this study as a potential factor influencing readmission rates. Posterior cervical spinal fusion patients have a higher 90-day readmission rate and different baseline demographics than patients undergoing an anterior approach [40]. Thus, future studies that differentiate patients by surgical approaches can further elucidate the impact of weekend admissions on readmissions. Regardless, our paper is the first to confirm the weekend effect in patients undergoing ECSF, highlighting the significant clinical and financial benefits that can be achieved by improving care for weekend-admitted patients.


Understanding the impact of surgical operation day on postoperative outcomes is key to improving cost-effective care delivery and preoperative planning in ECSF. Our study is the first to define the association between the weekend effect and complications such as thromboembolic events and neurological complications. Thus, postoperative infections, neurological conditions, DVT, and pulmonary embolism are important risk factors that should be carefully monitored after surgery to help mitigate the risks of readmission. On the other hand, baseline patient characteristics are not predictive of readmission rates in weekend vs weekday admissions for ECSF. Our study underscores the fact that weekend elective surgery is a potential area of focus for quality improvement.


Conflict of Interest

The authors have nothing to disclose.


This study received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-forprofit sectors.

Author Contribution

Conceptualization: RR, CD, SP, JK, SC; Data curation: CD, SP, BY, VA, AV; Formal analysis: RR, CD, BB; Methodology: RR, CD, SP, VA, AV; Project administration: RR, CD, SP, JK, SC; Visualization: RR, CD; Writing - original draft: RR, CD, BB; Writing - review & editing: RR, CD, BB, JM.

Table 1.
General characteristics of weekday versus weekend index admission cohorts
Characteristic Weekday (n = 125,590) Weekend (n = 1,026) p-value
Female sex 63,546 (50.68) 506 (49.32) 0.716
Age (yr) < 0.001*
18–49 27,352 (21.78) 223 (21.73)
50–59 38,096 (30.33) 262 (25.54)
60–69 36,094 (28.74) 278 (27.1)
70–79 20,339 (16.19) 199 (19.4)
≥ 80 3,709 (2.95) 64 (6.24)
Payor status < 0.001*
Medicaid 12,453 (9.92) 111 (10.82)
Medicare 50,141 (39.92) 501 (48.83)
Other/unknown 11,677 (9.92) 66 (6.43)
Private insurance 49,969 (39.79) 327 (31.87)
Self-pay 1,187 (0.95) 19 (1.85)
Total charges (USD) 97,960.79 ± 87,451.10 121,780.58 ± 132,717.32 < 0.001*
LOS (day) 2.76 ± 4.51 5.37 ± 9.53 < 0.001*
Elixhauser comorbidity index 0.527
0 27,180 (21.64) 238 (23.2) 0.279
1–4 89,253 (71.07) 710 (69.2) 0.187
≥5 9,157 (7.29) 78 (7.6) 0.794
Discharge status < 0.001*
Routine 97,021 (77.25) 659 (64.23) < 0.001*
Short-term hospital 255 (0.2) 0.816
Home health care 18,467 (14.7) 193 (18.81) < 0.001*
Skilled nursing facility, intermediate care facility, and other facilities 9,464 (7.54) 162 (15.79) < 0.001*
Against medical advice 181 (0.14) 0.910
30 Days 5,423 (4.30) 78 (7.60) < 0.001*
90 Days 9,742 (7.80) 165 (16.10) < 0.001*

Values are presented as mean±standard deviation or number (%).

USD, United States dollar; LOS, length of stay.

* p<0.05, statistically significant differences.

Incidence is less than or equal to 11 and is omitted for data privacy.

Table 2.
Comorbidities in weekday versus weekday index admission patients
Comorbidity Weekday (n = 104,431) Weekend (n = 742) p-value
Acquired immunodeficiency syndrome 162 (0.13) 0.351
Alcohol abuse 2,097 (1.67) 18 (1.75) 0.945
Blood loss anemia 272 (0.22) 0.985
Cardiac arrhythmias 8,858 (7.05) 62 (6.04) 0.389
Congestive heart failure 3,739 (2.98) 36 (3.51) 0.572
Coagulopathy 2,042 (1.63) 17 (1.66) 0.001*
Chronic pulmonary disease 23,858 (19.0) 175 (17.06) 0.082
Deficiency anemias 1,228 (0.98) 16 (1.56) 0.167
Depression 21,944 (17.47) 173 (16.86) 0.810
Diabetes (with chronic complications) 9,381 (7.47) 79 (7.7) 0.395
Diabetes (uncomplicated) 17,578 (14.0) 133 (12.96) 0.460
Drug abuse 3,285 (2.62) 22 (2.14) 0.608
Fluid/electrolyte disorder 6,735 (5.36) 53 (5.17) 0.859
Hypertension (with chronic complications) 7,738 (6.16) 64 (6.24) 0.292
Hypertension (uncomplicated) 14,698 (11.7) 126 (12.28) 0.603
Hypothyroidism 59,976 (47.76) 481 (46.88) 0.852
Liver disease 2,153 (1.71) 19 (1.85) 0.912
Lymphoma 329 (0.26) 0.586
Metastatic cancer 576 (0.46) 0.982
Obesity 23,862 (19.0) 184 (17.93) 0.655
Other neurological disorders 4,891 (3.89) 45 (4.39) 0.664
Paralysis 2,405 (1.91) 26 (2.53) 0.341
Pulmonary circulation disorders 771 (0.61) 0.649
Psychoses 494 (0.39) 0.885
Peptic ulcer disease 351 (0.28) 0.454
Peripheral vascular disease 3,005 (2.39) 46 (4.48) < 0.001*
Renal failure 6,168 (4.91) 48 (4.68) 0.850
Rheumatoid arthritis/collagen vascular disease 5,845 (4.65) 35 (3.41) 0.154
Solid tumor without metastases 1,016 (0.81) 0.955
Valvular disease 2,732 (2.18) 20 (1.95) 0.846
Weight loss 1,063 (0.85) 0.835

Values are presented as number (%).

* p<0.05, statistically significant differences.

Incidence is less than or equal to 11 and is omitted for data privacy.

Table 3.
Complications of weekday versus weekday index admission patients
Complication Weekday (n = 125,590) Weekend (n = 1,026) p-value
All-cause 10,826 (8.62) 130 (12.7) < 0.001*
Deep vein thrombosis 300 (0.24) 13 (1.27) < 0.001*
Dehiscence 153 (0.12) 0.300
Dural tear 16 (0.01) 0.936
Foreign body reaction 142 (0.11) 0.239
Gastrointestinal complications 256 (0.2) 0.994
Genitourinary complications 149 (0.12) 0.542
Hardware related complications 505 (0.4) 0.303
Intraoperative complications 6,990 (5.57) 46 (4.48) 0.286
Neurologic complications 1,251 (1.0) 25 (2.44) < 0.001*
Nonunion 370 (0.29) 0.994
Peripheral vascular complications 165 (0.13) 0.954
Post-operative infection 418 (0.33) 27 (2.63) < 0.001*
Post-operative shock 54 (0.04) 0.801
Pulmonary embolism 198 (0.16) < 0.001*
Respiratory complications 892 (0.71) 13 (1.27) 0.107

Values are presented as number (%).

* p<0.05, statistically significant differences.

Incidence is less than or equal to 11 and is omitted for data privacy.

Table 4.
Odds ratios for 30-day readmission comparing weekday versus weekend admissions
Weekend effect Odds ratio (95% CI) p-value
Crude (unadjusted) odds ratio for readmission following weekend admission 1.82 (1.44–2.30) < 0.001*
Odds ratio for readmission following weekend admission adjusted for sex, age, and payor status 1.70 (1.35–2.15) < 0.001*
Odds ratio for readmission following weekend admission adjusted for sex, age, payor status, and comorbidities 1.71 (1.35–2.15) < 0.001*

CI, confidence interval.

* p<0.05, statistically significant differences.

Table 5.
Odds ratios for 90-day readmission comparing weekday versus weekend admissions
Weekend effect Odds ratio (95% CI) p-value
Crude (unadjusted) odds ratio for readmission following weekend admission 2.28 (1.93-2.70) < 0.001*
Odds ratio for readmission following weekend admission adjusted for sex, age, and payor status 2.14 (1.81-2.54) < 0.001*
Odds ratio for readmission following weekend admission adjusted for sex, age, payor status, and comorbidities 2.15 (1.81-2.55) < 0.001*

CI, confidence interval.

* p<0.05, statistically significant differences.

Table 6.
Diagnosis upon 30-day and 90-day readmissions in weekday versus weekday index admission cohorts
Reasons for 30-day readmission
ICD-10 code Frequency, weekday (%) Diagnosis on readmission ICD-10 code Frequency, weekend (%) Diagnosis on readmission
T814XXA 7.01 Infection following a procedure T814XXA 7.52 Infection following a procedure
M4802 5.42 Spinal stenosis, cervical region A419 6.15 Sepsis, unspecified organism
A419 4.54 Sepsis, unspecified organism J189 2.78 Pneumonia, unspecified organism
M4712 3.22 Other spondylosis with myelopathy, cervical region J690 2.61 Pneumonitis due to inhalation of food and vomit
I2699 2.03 Other pulmonary embolism without acute cor pulmonale G8918 2.40 Other acute postprocedural pain
T8131XA 1.89 Disruption of external operation (surgical) wound, not elsewhere classified, initial encounter I2699 2.18 Other pulmonary embolism without acute cor pulmonale
G8918 1.74 Other acute postprocedural pain R1310 1.96 Dysphagia, unspecified
J189 1.68 Pneumonia, unspecified organism T8131XA 1.85 Disruption of external operation (surgical) wound, not elsewhere classified, initial encounter
J690 1.48 Pneumonitis due to inhalation of food and vomit N179 1.80 Acute kidney failure, unspecified
T8132XA 1.28 Disruption of internal operation (surgical) wound, not elsewhere classified, initial encounter M96842 1.36 Postprocedural seroma of a musculoskeletal structure following a musculoskeletal system procedure
N179 1.28 Acute kidney failure, unspecified G9782 1.31 Other postprocedural complications and disorders of nervous system
M4722 1.08 Other spondylosis with radiculopathy, cervical region T8132XA 1.20 Disruption of internal operation (surgical) wound, not elsewhere classified, initial encounter
T84226A 1.08 Displacement of internal fixation device of vertebrae, initial encounter N390 1.20 Urinary tract infection, site not specified
G9782 1.07 Other postprocedural complications and disorders of nervous system L7632 1.03 Postprocedural hematoma of skin and subcutaneous tissue following other procedure
R1310 0.94 Dysphagia, unspecified T8189XA 1.20 Other complications of procedures, not elsewhere classified, initial encounter
Reasons for 90-day readmission
M4802 6.09 Spinal stenosis, cervical region A419 6.7 Sepsis, unspecified organism
T814XXA 4.77 Infection following a procedure T814XXA 5.87 Infection following a procedure
A419 3.69 Sepsis, unspecified organism J189 2.47 Pneumonia, unspecified organism
M4712 3.39 Other spondylosis with myelopathy, cervical region J690 1.87 Pneumonitis due to inhalation of food and vomit
M4806 1.54 Spinal stenosis, lumbar region N179 1.87 Acute kidney failure, unspecified
T84226A 1.46 Displacement of internal fixation device of vertebrae, initial encounter I2699 1.63 Other pulmonary embolism without acute cor pulmonale
I2699 1.32 Other pulmonary embolism without acute cor pulmonale T8131XA 1.47 Disruption of external operation (surgical) wound, not elsewhere classified, initial encounter
T8131XA 1.32 Disruption of external operation (surgical) wound, not elsewhere classified, initial encounter G8918 1.6 Other acute postprocedural pain
N179 1.28 Acute kidney failure, unspecified M4802 1.23 Spinal stenosis, cervical region
J189 1.25 Pneumonia, unspecified organism R1310 1.2 Dysphagia, unspecified
M4722 1.21 Other spondylosis with radiculopathy, cervical region N390 1.1 Urinary tract infection, site not specified
G8918 0.91 Other acute postprocedural pain I214 1.03 Non-ST elevation myocardial infarction
J690 0.90 Pneumonitis due to inhalation of food and vomit J441 1 Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with acute exacerbation, unspecified
M960 0.87 Pseudarthrosis after fusion or arthrodesis G9782 0.93 Other postprocedural complications and disorders of nervous system
N390 0.83 Urinary tract infection, site not specified T8132XA 0.9 Disruption of internal operation (surgical) wound, not elsewhere classified, initial encounter

ICD-10, International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision.


1. Salzmann SN, Derman PB, Lampe LP, et al. Cervical spinal fusion: 16-year trends in epidemiology, indications, and in-hospital outcomes by surgical approach. World Neurosurg 2018;113:e280-95.
crossref pmid
2. Shen Y, Silverstein JC, Roth S. In-hospital complications and mortality after elective spinal fusion surgery in the united states: a study of the nationwide inpatient sample from 2001 to 2005. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol 2009;21:21-30.
3. Weiss HK, Yamaguchi JT, Garcia RM, et al. Trends in national use of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion from 2006 to 2016. World Neurosurg 2020;138:e42-51.
crossref pmid pmc
4. Hines AL, Barrett ML, Jiang HJ, et al. Conditions with the largest number of adult hospital readmissions by payer, 2011. 2014 Apr. In: Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) statistical briefs [Internet]. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2006.Feb–.

5. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Readmission measures overview. Qualitynet Home [Internet]. Baltimore (MD): Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services; 2022 [cited 2022 Apr 9]. Available from: https://qualitynet.cms.gov/inpatient/measures/readmission.

6. Pauls LA, Johnson-Paben R, McGready J, et al. The weekend effect in hospitalized patients: a meta-analysis. J Hosp Med 2017;12:760-6.
crossref pmid pdf
7. Smith SA, Yamamoto JM, Roberts DJ, et al. Weekend surgical care and postoperative mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies. Med Care 2018;56:121-9.
8. Tileston KR, Uzosike M, Segovia N, et al. Day of the week of surgery affects time to discharge for patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Orthopedics 2020;43:8-12.
crossref pmid
9. Nandyala SV, Marquez-Lara A, Fineberg SJ, et al. Comparison of perioperative outcomes and cost of spinal fusion for cervical trauma: weekday versus weekend admissions. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2013;38:2178-83.
10. Rosenberg A, Dominy C, Bueno BT, et al. Weekend admission increases risk of readmissions following elective thoracolumbar spinal fusion. Global Spine J 2022 Aug 15:21925682221120788. doi: 10.1177/21925682221120788. [Epub].
crossref pdf
11. De la Garza Ramos R, Longo M, Gelfand Y, et al. Weekend versus weekday admission in spinal cord injury and its effect on timing of surgical intervention. World Neurosurg 2019;122:e754-8.
crossref pmid
12. Rumalla K, Smith KA, Arnold PM. National rates, causes, risk factors, and outcomes associated with 30-day and 90-day readmissions following degenerative posterior cervical spine surgery utilizing the nationwide readmissions database. Neurosurgery 2017;81:740-51.
crossref pmid pdf
13. Gasparini A, Salmasian H, Williman J, et al. Package ‘comorbidity Version 1.0.5. Computing Comorbidity Scores [Internet]. R Foundation. 2022 [2022 Apr 9]. Available from: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/comorbidity/comorbidity.pdf.

14. Virtanen P, Gommers R, Oliphant TE, et al. SciPy 1.0: fundamental algorithms for scientific computing in Python. Nat Methods 2020;17:261-72.
pmid pmc
15. Goyal A, Bhandarkar AR, Alvi MA, et al. Cost of readmissions following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: insights from the nationwide readmissions database. Neurosurgery 2020;87:679-88.
crossref pmid pdf
16. Martino J, Peterson B, Thompson S, et al. Day of week and surgery location effects on stay length and cost for total joint arthroplasty: academic versus orthopaedic-specific hospital. J Knee Surg 2018;31:815-21.
crossref pmid
17. Adogwa O, Lilly DT, Vuong VD, et al. Extended length of stay in elderly patients after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion is not attributable to baseline illness severity or postoperative complications. World Neurosurg 2018;115:e552-7.
crossref pmid
18. Sonig A, Khan IS, Wadhwa R, et al. The impact of comorbidities, regional trends, and hospital factors on discharge dispositions and hospital costs after acoustic neuroma microsurgery: a United States nationwide inpatient data sample study (2005-2009). Neurosurg Focus 2012;33:E3.
crossref pmc
19. Kwok CS, Martinez SC, Pancholy S, et al. Effect of comorbidity on unplanned readmissions after percutaneous coronary intervention (from The Nationwide Readmission Database). Sci Rep 2018;8:11156.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
20. Hustedt JW, Goltzer O, Bohl DD, et al. Calculating the cost and risk of comorbidities in total joint arthroplasty in the United States. J Arthroplasty 2017;32:355-61.e1.
crossref pmid
21. Kim J, Kim TH. Risk factors for postoperative deep infection after instrumented spinal fusion surgeries for degenerative spinal disease: a nationwide cohort study of 194,036 patients. J Clin Med 2022;11:778.
crossref pmid pmc
22. Almeida ND, Lee R, Wei C, et al. Coagulation profile as a significant risk factor for short-term complications and mortality after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. World Neurosurg 2021;148:e74-86.
crossref pmid
23. Elsamadicy AA, Koo AB, Lee M, et al. Patient risk factors associated with 30- and 90-day readmission after cervical discectomy: a nationwide readmission database study. Clin Spine Surg 2020;33:E434-41.
24. Bernatz JT, Tueting JL, Anderson PA. Thirty-day readmission rates in orthopedics: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 2015;10:e0123593.
crossref pmid pmc
25. Taylor BES, Hilden P, Hansen RTB, et al. National rates, reasons, and risk factors for 30- and 90-day readmission and reoperation among patients undergoing anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: an analysis using the nationwide readmissions database. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2021;46:1302-14.
26. Yarbrough CK, Gamble PG, Burhan Janjua M, et al. Readmission after spinal cord injury: analysis of an institutional cohort of 795 patients. J Neurosurg Sci 2018;62:265-70.
crossref pmid
27. Hajibandeh S, Hajibandeh S, Satyadas T. Impact of weekend effect on postoperative mortality in patients undergoing emergency general surgery procedures: meta-analysis of prospectively maintained national databases across the world. Surgeon 2020;18:231-40.
crossref pmid
28. Neifert SN, Gal JS, Chapman EK, et al. Nonhome discharge as an independent risk factor for adverse events and readmission in patients undergoing anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. Clin Spine Surg 2020;33:E454-9.
crossref pmid
29. Gallego FQ, Miranda CA, Sinzato YK, et al. Temporal analysis of distribution pattern of islet cells and antioxidant enzymes for diabetes onset in postnatal critical development window in rats. Life Sci 2019;226:57-67.
crossref pmid
30. Hendey GW, Barth BE, Soliz T. Overnight and postcall errors in medication orders. Acad Emerg Med 2005;12:629-34.
crossref pmid
31. Wen T, Pease M, Attenello FJ, et al. Evaluation of effect of weekend admission on the prevalence of hospital-acquired conditions in patients receiving cervical fusions. World Neurosurg 2015;84:58-68.
crossref pmid
32. Morton B, Nagaraja S, Collins A, et al. A retrospective evaluation of critical care blood culture yield - do support services contribute to the "weekend effect"? PLoS One 2015;10:e0141361.
crossref pmid pmc
33. Malik AT, Xie J, Xi R, et al. Risk factors for post-discharge complications and readmissions in home-discharges after elective posterior lumbar fusions. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2019;185:105501.
crossref pmid
34. Eastlack RK, Ledesma JB, Tran S, et al. Home versus rehabilitation: factors that influence disposition after minimally invasive surgery in adult spinal deformity surgery. World Neurosurg 2018;118:e610-5.
crossref pmid
35. Mechanic R. Post-acute care--the next frontier for controlling Medicare spending. N Engl J Med 2014;370:692-4.
crossref pmid
36. Ogura Y, Gum JL, Steele P, et al. Drivers for nonhome discharge in a consecutive series of 1502 patients undergoing 1- or 2-level lumbar fusion. Neurosurg Spine 2020:1-6. doi: 10.3171/2020.5.SPINE20410. [Epub].
37. Karhade AV, Ogink PT, Thio Q, et al. Discharge disposition after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. World Neurosurg 2019;132:e14-20.
crossref pmid
38. Di Capua J, Somani S, Kim JS, et al. Predictors for patient discharge destination after elective anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2017;42:1538-44.
crossref pmid
39. Wathen C, Kshettry VR, Krishnaney A, et al. The association between operating room personnel and turnover with surgical site infection in more than 12 000 neurosurgical cases. Neurosurgery 2016;79:889-94.
crossref pmid
40. Schafer E, Bazydlo M, Schultz L, et al. Rates and risk factors associated with 90-day readmission following cervical spine fusion surgery: analysis of the Michigan Spine Surgery Improvement Collaborative (MSSIC) registry. Spine J 2020;20:708-16.
crossref pmid

Editorial Office
CHA University, CHA School of Medicine Bundang Medical Center
59 Yatap-ro, Bundang-gu, Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do 13496, Korea
Tel: +82-31-780-1924  Fax: +82-31-780-5269  E-mail: support@e-neurospine.org
The Korean Spinal Neurosurgery Society
#407, Dong-A Villate 2nd Town, 350 Seocho-daero, Seocho-gu, Seoul 06631, Korea
Tel: +82-2-585-5455  Fax: +82-2-2-523-6812  E-mail: ksns1987@gmail.com
Business License No.: 209-82-62443

Copyright © The Korean Spinal Neurosurgery Society.

Developed in M2PI

Close layer
prev next