1. Amundsen T, Weber H, Nordal HJ, Magnaes B, Abdelnoor M, et al. Lumbar spinal stenosis: conservative or surgical management? A prospective 10-year study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2000 25:1424-1435. PMID:
10828926.
2. Atlas SJ, Keller RB, Robson D, Deyo RA, Singer DE. Surgical and nonsurgical management of lumbar spinal stenosis: four-year outcomes from the main lumbar spine study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2000 25:556-562. PMID:
10749631.
3. Cavuşoğlu H, Kaya RA, Türkmenoglu ON, Tuncer C, Colak I, et al. Midterm outcome after unilateral approach for bilateral decompression of lumbar spinal stenosis: 5-year prospective study. Eur Spine J 2007 16:2133-2142. PMID:
17712577.
4. Ciol MA, Deyo RA, Howell E, Kreif S. An assessment of surgery for spinal stenosis: time trends, geographic variations, complications, and reoperations. J Am Geriatr Soc 1996 44:285-290. PMID:
8600197.
5. Costa F, Sassi M, Cardia A, Ortolina A, De Santis A, et al. Degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: analysis of results in a series of 374 patients treated with unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression. J Neurosurg Spine 2007 7:579-586. PMID:
18074681.
6. Hermansen E, Moen G, Barstad J, Birketvedt R, Indrekvam K. Laminarthrectomy as a surgical approach for decompressing the spinal canal: assessment of preoperative versus postoperative dural sac cross-sectional area. Eur Spine J 2013 22(8):1913-1919. PMID:
23494757.
7. Hong SW, Choi KY, Anh Y, Baek OK, Wang JC, et al. A comparison of unilateral and bilateral laminotomies for decompression of L4-5 spinal stenosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2011 36:E172-E178. PMID:
21192307.
8. Kanno H, Ozawa H, Koizumi Y, Morozumi N, Aizawa T, et al. Dynamic change of dural sac cross-sectional area in axial loaded magnetic resonance imaging correlates with the severity of clinical symptoms in patients with lumbar spinal canal stenosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2012 37:207-213. PMID:
21301392.
9. Lohman CM, Tallroth K, Kettunen JA, Lindgren KA. Comparison of radiologic signs and clinical symptoms of spinal stenosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2006 31:1834-1840. PMID:
16845360.
10. Moon ES, Kim HS, Park JO. Comparison of the predictive value of myelography, computed tomography, and MRI on the treadmill test in lumbar spinal stenosis. Yonsei Med J 2005 46:806-811. PMID:
16385657.
11. Morgalla MH, Noak N, Merkle M, Tatagiba MS. Lumbar spinal stenosis in elderly patients: is a unilateral microsurgical approach sufficient for decompression. J Neurosurg Spine 2011 14:305-312. PMID:
21235300.
12. Oba H, Takahashi J, Futatsugi T, Mogami Y, Shibata S, et al. Study of dural sac cross-sectional area in early and late phase after lumbar decompression surgery. Spine J 2013 13(9):1088-1094. PMID:
23850257.
13. Ogikubo O, Forsberg L, Hansson T. The relationship between the cross-sectional area of the cauda equine and preoperative symptoms in central lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2007 32:1423-1428. PMID:
17545910.
14. Park YJ, Park KH, Kim TW, Kim JC. Unilateral laminectomy and bilateral decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis with microscope and tubular retractor system. Korean J Spine 2008 5(2):77-82.
15. Schonstrom NS, Bolender NF, Spengler DM. The patho-morphology of spinal stenosis as seen on CT scans of the lumbar spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1985 10:806-811. PMID:
4089655.
16. Schonstrom N, Hansson T. Pressure changes following constriction of the cauda equine. An experimental study in situ. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1988 13:385-388. PMID:
3406845.
17. Sigmundsson FG, Kang XP, Jönsson B, Strömqvist B. Correlation between disability and MRI findings in lumbar spinal stenosis: a prospective study of 109 patiens operated on by decompression. Acta Orthop 2011 82:204-210. PMID:
21434811.
18. Sirvanci M, Bhatia M, Ganiyusufoglu KA. Degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: correlation with Oswestry Disability Index and MR imaging. Eur Spine J 2008 17:679-685. PMID:
18324426.
19. Spetzger U, Bertalanffy H, Naujokat C, Von Keyserlingk DG, Gilsbach JM. Unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression of lumbar spinal stenosis. Part I: Anatomical and surgical considerations. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 1997 139:392-396. PMID:
9204106.
20. Spetzger U, Bertalanffy H, Reinges MH, Gilasbach JM. Unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression of lumbar spinal stenosis. Part II: Clinical experiences. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 1997 139:397-403. PMID:
9204107.
21. Thomé C, Zevgaridis D, Leheta O, Bäzner H, Pöckler-Schöniger C, et al. Outcome after less-invasive decompression of lumbar spinal stenosis: a randomized comparison of unilateral laminotomy, bilateral laminotomy, and laminectomy. J Neurosurg Spine 2005 3:129-141. PMID:
16370302.
22. Yamazaki K, Yosida S, Ito T, Toba T, Kato S, et al. Postoperative outcome of lumbar spinal canal stenosis after fenestration: correlation with changes in intradural and extradural tube on magnetic resonance imaging. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 2002 10(2):136-143. PMID:
12493925.