Warning: mkdir(): Permission denied in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 87 Warning: chmod() expects exactly 2 parameters, 3 given in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 88 Warning: fopen(/home/virtual/e-kjs/journal/upload/ip_log/ip_log_2026-02.txt): failed to open stream: No such file or directory in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 95 Warning: fwrite() expects parameter 1 to be resource, boolean given in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 96 Long-term Outcomes of Multilevel Anterior Cervical Osteotomy and Posterior Instrumentation for OPLL-Induced Myelopathy With Cervical Kyphosis
Neurospine Search

CLOSE


Neurospine > Volume 22(3); 2025 > Article
Kim, Shahi, Lee, and Bae: Long-term Outcomes of Multilevel Anterior Cervical Osteotomy and Posterior Instrumentation for OPLL-Induced Myelopathy With Cervical Kyphosis

Graphical Abstract

ns-2550256-128f7.jpg

Abstract

Objective

To analyze long-term clinical and radiological outcomes after multilevel anterior osteotomy with posterior instrumentation in patients with ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL)-induced myelopathy and cervical kyphosis.

Methods

Patients who underwent multilevel anterior osteotomy with posterior instrumentation for OPLL-induced myelopathy and cervical kyphosis and had a minimum of 5-year follow-up were included. Clinical outcomes (Japanese Orthopaedic Association score system for cervical myelopathy [C-JOA], 12-item Short Form health survey [SF-12], Neck Disability Index [NDI]) and radiological parameters (C2–7 lordosis, center of gravity of the head [CGH]-C7 sagittal vertical axis [SVA], T1 slope) were analyzed at the preoperative, immediate postoperative, and latest follow-up timepoints.

Results

Twenty-eight patients were included. The average follow-up period was 66.4 months. All clinical outcome parameters showed significant improvement. C-JOA, SF-12, and NDI showed significant improvement at latest follow-up (p<0.001). C2–7 lordosis increased significantly immediately postoperatively (-6.0°±10.4°) compared to preoperatively (+9.2°±9.6°), and was largely maintained at latest follow-up (-5.7°±9.4°). T1 slope significantly increased between the immediate postoperative timepoint (21.9°±7.7°) and latest follow-up (24.2°±9.5°) (p=0.046). CGH-C7 SVA significantly increased between the immediate postoperative timepoint (22.7±14.8 mm) and latest follow-up (32.2±22.6 mm) (p=0.046).

Conclusion

Multilevel anterior osteotomy with posterior instrumentation is a safe and effective surgical option for OPLL-induced myelopathy with kyphotic cervical alignment. Future studies are required to investigate the forward tilting of cervical spine over time after surgery.

INTRODUCTION

Ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL)-induced myelopathy can cause irreversible neurological damage and is an indication for surgery [1]. Surgical strategies for multilevel cervical OPLL include posterior laminoplasty/laminectomy and fusion for indirect decompression and multilevel anterior osteotomy for direct decompression [2]. Posterior approach is usually preferred in patients with >3 affected spinal levels and high age. However, as the posterior approach relies on posterior drift of the spinal cord, it is ineffective in cases with kyphotic cervical alignment and OPLL with canal occupancy ratio of >60% [3]. Anterior surgery allows for direct removal of OPLL and cervical realignment and hence is more suitable for these cases. The K-line index is also useful in deciding between anterior and posterior approaches. Anterior approach is preferred in K-line (-) cases as the posterior approach can further aggravate preexiting kyphosis [4].
Although a combined approach with anterior osteotomy and posterior stabilization has been reported to be the most appropriate for multilevel OPLL with kyphosis [5], no previous study has analyzed long-term outcomes after this surgery. As such, there is a lack of evidence regarding maintenance of clinical improvement and cervical realignment over long term after surgery. The purpose of the study was, therefore, to fill this gap in the literature by assessing long-term clinical and radiological outcomes of multilevel anterior osteotomy and posterior stabilization for multilevel OPLL with kyphotic cervical spine.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

1. Study Design and Population

This was a retrospective review of prospectively collected data approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of Wooridul Spine Hospital (IRB No. 2012-100). Consecutive patients who underwent multilevel anterior osteotomy plus posterior stabilization for multilevel OPLL-induced myelopathy with kyphotic cervical spine alignment at a single spine hospital between January 2012 and January 2016 were included. All patients had a minimum of 5-year follow-up. Patients with lordotic sagittal alignment (C2–7 lordosis<0°), K-line (+), osteoporosis (bone mineral density (T-score<-2.5), and history of cervical operation were excluded. Osteoporotic patients (bone mineral density T-score<-2.5) were excluded due to the increased risk of implant-related complications and correction loss, even with posterior fixation. Although posterior fixation enhances stability, significant osteoporosis still poses high risk for subsidence and implant loosening, potentially confounding the results. Thus, we excluded these patients to maintain homogeneity and ensure validity of outcomes. Patients with cervical kyphotic deformity, myelopathy symptoms, and K-line negative status uniformly underwent combined anterior multilevel osteotomy and posterior fixation. The decision was consistent across the included cohort, following standardized surgical protocols followed at our institution. Patient selection flowchart is shown in Fig. 1.

2. Surgical Technique

A standard transverse incision along the anterior neck crease was typically made. For extensive 4-level surgeries, the incision length was extended vertically along the medial border of the sternocleidomastoid muscle to adequately expose the surgical field. Grades 3 and 4 anterior osteotomies were performed according to the Ames cervical osteotomy classification [6]. Grade 3 is a partial or complete corpectomy and grade 4 is a complete uncovertebral joint resection to the transverse foramen. Grade 4 osteotomy was performed to ensure sufficient release of bilateral foramen, and grade 3 osteotomy was performed in continuous type OPLL-induced myelopathy patients. Posterior instrumentation was done in form of lateral mass or pedicle screws and rods. We utilized lordotic cages made from polyetheretherketone to achieve and maintain the lordotic curvature. These cages were typically available in angles ranging from 6° to 8° and filled with autologous bone graft harvested during osteotomies. The anterior approach (osteotomies, decompression, and cage insertion) was performed first. Following repositioning, posterior fixation was performed for added stability. The posterior procedure was strictly limited to instrumentation without additional osteotomies. All surgeries were completed in a single session with intraoperative repositioning between the anterior and posterior procedures.

3. Data Collection

Following data were collected: (1) Demographic variables: age, sex, follow-up duration. (2) Operative variables: osteotomy grade and levels, posterior stabilization levels, lower instrumented vertebra (LIV). (3) Clinical outcomes: patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) included Japanese Orthopaedic Association score for cervical myelopathy (C-JOA), 12-item Short Form health survey (SF-12) score, and Neck Disability Index (NDI). C-JOA was used to evaluate the clinical recovery in myelopathy, SF-12 was used to evaluate the patient’s quality of life, and NDI was used to evaluate pain and disability of the neck. These PROMs were recorded preoperatively and at latest followup. (4) Radiological outcomes: (i) Cervical alignment parameters: C2-7 lordosis, center of gravity of the head (CGH)-C7 sagittal vertical axis (SVA) [7], T1 slope (Fig. 2). These were measures on lateral radiographs at the preoperative, immediate postoperative, and latest follow-up timepoints. For C2-7 lordosis, (+) denoted kyphotic angle and (-) denoted lordotic angle. (ii) Subsidence and implant failure: these were assessed on radiographs and computed tomography (CT) at the latest follow-up. Subsidence was defined as >3 mm loss in anterior or posterior interbody space height when comparing immediate postoperative and latest follow-up radiographs. (iii) Adjacent segment degeneration (ASD): presence of ASD was evaluated on magnetic resonance imaging by assessing the disc height, disc signal intensity, disc protrusion, central and foraminal stenosis, and narrowing of disc space.

4. Statistical Analysis

Statistical analyses were performed using IBM SPSS Statistics ver. 19.0 (IBM Co., USA). Changes in the postoperative radiologic parameters and clinical outcome parameters were compared using paired t-tests. A p-value of <0.05 was deemed as statistically significant.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight patients were included. The mean age was 59.9±10.2 years. Twenty-four patients (85.7%) were male and 4 (14.3%) were female. The mean follow-up period was 66.4±8.6 months. Twenty-one patients (75%) underwent grade 3 osteotomy and 7 patients (25%) underwent grade 4 osteotomy. Posterior instrumentation ranged from 3 to 5 spinal segments. The LIV was C7 in 24 patients (85.7%) and C6 in 4 patients (14.3%). The average total operative time was 210±60.2 minutes, with a mean estimated blood loss of 73.2±55.6 mL (Table 1).
C2–7 lordosis significantly increased at the immediate postoperative timepoint (-6.0°±10.4°) compared to preoperative (-9.2°±9.6°) (p=0.025). This improvement in C2–7 lordosis was maintained at the latest follow-up (-5.7°±9.4°) and no significant difference was seen in C2–7 lordosis between the immediate postoperative and latest follow-up timepoints (p=0.842). T1 slope did not increase significantly at the immediate postoperative timepoint (21.9°±7.7°) compared to preoperative (19.5°±8.8°) (p=0.103). However, statistically significant increase was seen in T1 slope at the latest follow-up (24.2°±9.5) compared to immediate postoperative (p=0.046). CGH-C7 SVA did not increase significantly at the immediate postoperative timepoint (22.7±14.8 mm) compared to preoperative (19.1±21.3 mm) (p=0.326). However, statistically significant increase was seen in CGH-C7 SVA at the latest follow-up (32.2±22.6 mm) compared to immediate postoperative (p=0.046) (Table 2). None of the patients showed ASD or subsidence until the latest follow-up.
C-JOA score significantly improved from 10.7±0.4 preoperatively to 15.8±0.4 at latest follow-up (p<0.001). SF-12 score significantly improved from 34.1±3.6 preoperatively to 44±4.1 at latest follow-up (p<0.001). NDI score significantly improved from 38.6±6.6 preoperatively to 15.9±4.5 at latest follow-up (p<0.001) (Table 3). There were no preoperative or postoperative complications, such as hematoma, screw malposition, esophageal injury, thoracic duct injury, vessel injury, and recurrent laryngeal nerve injury.

1. Illustrative Cases

1) Case 1 (Ames cervical osteotomy classification grade 3 - partial or complete corpectomy)

A 48-year-old gentleman was diagnosed with OPLL at C4–6 causing myelopathy (Fig. 3). He underwent Ames anterior cervical osteotomy grade 3 at C4–6 levels with posterior instrumentation at C3–7. C2–7 lordosis increased to -1.1° at the immediate postoperative timepoint compared to +5.2° preoperatively (-1.1°) and remained almost unchanged (-0.9°) at latest followup (Fig. 4AC). T1 slope increased from 20.7° preoperatively to 26.3° at the immediate postoperative timepoint and 29.4° at latest follow-up (Fig. 4AC). CGH-C7 SVA increased from 44.3 mm at the immediate postoperative timepoint to 47.1 mm at latest follow-up (Fig. 4B, C). There was no subsidence or implant failure until latest follow-up (Figs. 3F and 4C). C-JOA, SF-12, and NDI scores improved postoperatively.

2) Case 2 (Ames cervical osteotomy classification grade 4 - complete uncovertebral joint resection to the transverse foramen)

A 62-year-old lady progressive paraparesis for 2 years. Imaging showed C3–6 OPLL. Patient underwent grade 4 osteotomy at C3–6 with posterior instrumentation. C2–7 lordosis increased to -3.9° at the immediate postoperative timepoint compared to +10.8° preoperatively (-1.1°) and remained almost unchanged (-3.8°) at latest follow-up (Fig. 4AC). T1 slope increased from 22.8° preoperatively to 26.2° at the immediate postoperative timepoint and 31.3° at latest follow-up (Fig. 5AC). CGH-C7 SVA increased from 3 mm at the immediate postoperative timepoint to 10.5 mm at latest follow-up (Fig. 5B, C). There was no subsidence or implant failure until latest follow-up (Figs. 2F and 5C). C-JOA, SF-12, and NDI scores improved postoperatively.

2. Best Correction Case

Cervical lordosis correction from +15.0° (preoperative) to -12.0° (postoperative) with favorable T1 slope (minimal increase from 19° to 21°). This optimal result was likely due to the patient’s adequate preoperative cervical flexibility and moderate kyphosis severity.

3. Worst Correction Case

Minimal cervical lordosis correction from +3.0° (preoperative) to +1.0° (postoperative) with considerable increase in SVA and T1 slope. This was likely attributable to severe preoperative stiffness, extensive degenerative changes, and poor bone quality that limited the achievable correction.

DISCUSSION

OPLL needs surgical intervention when presenting with cervical myelopathy. Previous studies have shown that laminoplasty is sufficiently effective in patients with multilevel cervical myelopathy [7-9]. However, the effectiveness of laminoplasty is dependent on posterior drift of the cord and therefore it is not an appropriate option for patients with kyphotic cervical alignment, especially >11°. Laminoplasty has also been shown to worsen malalignment after surgery [10-12]. In this study, we performed multilevel anterior osteotomy combined with posterior instrumentation for myelopathy caused by multilevel OPLL in presence of kyphotic alignment. The findings suggested that the surgery resulted in favorable clinical and radiological outcomes.
The study demonstrated a significant improvement in C2–7 lordosis at the immediate postoperative timepoint that was maintained until the latest follow-up. However, it is important to note that the average correction in the lordotic angle with anterior osteotomy of 3 levels or more was only about 15°. This insufficiently corrected angle is most likely due to failure of setting target values for various indicators such as horizontal gaze, chinbrow angle, and CGH-C7. Surgeries were performed with the aim of correcting the kyphotic alignment to a lordotic alignment. Although insufficient angle correction was obtained, the corrected angle was found to be well maintained at long-term follow-up. This maintenance of alignment correction was likely due to the stability provided by posterior instrumentation. Additionally, none of our patients had implant failure or subsidence over long term. Previous studies reported high rates of subsidence after multilevel anterior osteotomy [13,14]. We believe that this contrast in findings is due to supplementation with posterior stabilization in the current study.
Although the lordosis correction was maintained and the construct remained stable, the entire cervical spine above the cervicothoracic junction (CTJ) was seen to gradually tilt forward over long term (Fig. 6). This was seen likely due to insufficient correction of C2–7 lordosis and T1 slope-lordosis mismatch. Hyun et al. [15] demonstrated that neck disability worsens with progressive cervical sagittal malalignment following cervical reconstructive surgery. They reported that T1 slope-lordosis mismatch >26.1° may indicate cervical sagittal malalignment. The current study demonstrated that T1 slope increased gradually over long term. As such, the possibility of worsening of cervical alignment due to increase in T1 slope and therefore T1 slope-lordosis mismatch over time should be considered.
Inoue et al. [16] conducted a cross-sectional study of 388 asymptomatic subjects to assess age-related changes in T1 slope and found that it significantly increased with age. In a study of 478 subjects conducted by Lamas et al. [17], T1 slope was found to be significantly higher in patients >60 years compared to 40–60 years. Although these studies show that there is a natural progression in T1 slope with age, it is difficult to deduce the rate of progression as there is no evidence regarding it. In our study, the T1 slope increased significantly in 5 years after surgery which we believe is a higher rate than the natural progression. Xie et al. [18] conducted a study of 127 patients who underwent single or multilevel anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) and found that there was no significant difference in T1 slope at the immediate postoperative and latest follow-up timepoints. They also reported that T1 slope had a significant correlation with loss of C2–7 lordosis after ACDF. The mean follow-up in this study was 43.7 months. Das et al. [19] conducted a retrospective cohort study of 265 patients with adult cervical deformity and found that the undercorrected cohort had significantly higher chances of distal junctional kyphosis (DJK). Ani et al. [20] conducted a retrospective review of 69 cervical deformity patients and similarly concluded that severe DJK patients had insufficient correction.
Apart from insufficient lordosis correction, the forward tilting of the cervical spine over time can also be due to an overload on the CTJ to bear the weight of the head. Normally, these loads are divided and distributed amongst the cervical spine segments. However, in cases with C6 or C7 as the LIV, these loads are supported mainly by the CTJ due to a fixed cervical spine. Additionally, weakness of the cervical extensor muscles may also be associated with this phenomenon. Yoon et al. [21] demonstrated that the cervical lordotic angle was positively correlated with the ratio of flexor to extensor muscle cross-sectional areas. They concluded that there is a significant relationship between cervical muscle imbalance, including extensor muscle weakness, and loss of cervical lordosis. It is not clear from the current study whether the increase in T1 slope is due to stoppage of instrumentation at C6–7 or due to a natural phenomenon caused by the aging process during the follow-up period.
This study has several limitations. The retrospective design limits the level of evidence and single-center data reduces generalizability. The sample size was small (n=28) and treatment options were heterogeneous. A subgroup analysis of outcomes based on type of osteotomy would have been valuable. However, due to the low number of patients in each osteotomy subgroup, this comparative analysis was not feasible. Future studies with larger cohorts are required for such subgroup analyses that can provide more granular information. Additionally, assessment of bony fusion would have been valuable considering this was a fusion procedure. However, we lacked the data for fusion assessment. Despite the limitations, the current study shows the effective correction and long-term maintenance after multilevel anterior osteotomy and posterior instrumentation for OPLL with kyphotic alignment.

CONCLUSION

Multilevel anterior osteotomy with posterior instrumentation is a safe and effective surgical option for OPLL-induced myelopathy with kyphotic cervical alignment. Future studies are required to investigate the forward tilting of cervical spine over time after surgery.

NOTES

Conflict of Interest

The authors have nothing to disclose.

Funding/Support

This study received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author Contribution

Conceptualization: SJK, JB; Data curation: SJK; Formal analysis: SJK; Methodology: SJK, JB; Project administration: SHL, JB; Visualization: SHL; Writing – original draft: SJK, PS; Writing – review & editing: SJK, PS, SHL, JB.

Fig. 1.
Flowchart explaining patient selection. CSM, cervical spondylotic myelopathy; OPLL, ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament; CL, C2–7 lordosis; CGH, center of gravity of the head; SVA, sagittal vertical axis; C-JOA, Japanese Orthopaedic Association score system for cervical myelopathy; SF-12, 12-item Short Form health survey; NDI, Neck Disability Index; ASD, adjacent segment degeneration.
ns-2550256-128f1.jpg
Fig. 2.
Radiologic parameters. ① C2–7 lordosis: angle between the lower endplate of the C2 vertebra and lower endplate of the C7 vertebra. ② Center of gravity of the head-C7 sagittal vertical axis: interval between the plumb line of the anterior margin of the external auditory canal and the posterior-cranial corner of the C7 vertebral body. ③ T1 slope: angle formed by drawing a line along the superior endplate of T1 and horizontal reference line.
ns-2550256-128f2.jpg
Fig. 3.
Computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and myelogram of case 1. Sagittal images of preoperative CT (A), MRI (B), and coronal image of MRI myelography (C) showed ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament at C4–6 level and kyphotic cervical alignment. Postoperative sagittal images of CT (D) and MRI (E) showed adequately decompressed with correction of kyphosis.
ns-2550256-128f3.jpg
Fig. 4.
Radiographs of case 1. Lateral (A–C) and anteroposterior (D–F) views. Ames anterior cervical osteotomy grade 3 at C4–6 levels with posterior instrumentation at C3–7. (A–C) C2–7 lordosis increased to -1.1° at the immediate postoperative timepoint compared to +5.2° preoperatively (-1.1°) and remained almost unchanged (-0.9°) at latest follow-up. (A–C) T1 slope increased from 20.7° preoperatively to 26.3° at the immediate postoperative timepoint and 29.4° at latest follow-up. (B, C) CGH-C7 SVA increased from 44.3 mm at the immediate postoperative timepoint to 47.1 mm at latest follow-up. Disc height increased on the immediate postoperative anteroposterior (AP) image (E) compared with the preoperative AP image (D), and no evidence of subsidence or implant failure was observed until the latest follow-up (C, F). CGH, center of gravity of the head; SVA, sagittal vertical axis; preop, preoperative; postop, postoperative; AP, anteroposterior.
ns-2550256-128f4.jpg
Fig. 5.
Radiographs of case 2. Grade 4 osteotomy at C3–6 with posterior instrumentation. (A–C) C2–7 lordosis increased to -3.9° at the immediate postoperative timepoint compared to +10.8° preoperatively (-1.1°) and remained almost unchanged (-3.8°) at latest follow-up. (A–C) T1 slope increased from 22.8° preoperatively to 26.2° at the immediate postoperative timepoint and 31.3° at latest follow-up. (B, C) CGH-C7 SVA increased from 3 mm at the immediate postoperative timepoint to 10.5 mm at latest follow-up. Disc height increased on the immediate postoperative anteroposterior (AP) image (E) compared with the preoperative AP image (D), and no evidence of subsidence or implant failure was observed until the latest follow-up (C, F). CGH, center of gravity of the head; SVA, sagittal vertical axis; preop, preoperative; postop, postoperative; AP, anteroposterior.
ns-2550256-128f5.jpg
Fig. 6.
Long-term changes of radiologic parameters. C2–7 lordosis is increased at the immediate postoperative timepoint (B) compared to preoperative (A). (C) Even after long-term follow-up, its value remains almost unchanged. (B, C) T1 slope gradually increased over long term. The value of center of gravity of the head-C7 sagittal vertical axis showed a significant increase from the immediate postoperative period (B) to the long-term follow-up (C). Preop, preoperative; postop, postoperative.
ns-2550256-128f6.jpg
ns-2550256-128f7.jpg
Table 1.
Demographic data (n=28)
Demographic Value
Age at surgery (yr) 59.9 ± 10.2 (32–74)
Sex, male:female 24 (85.7):4 (14.3)
Follow-up duration (mo) 66.4 ± 8.6
Anterior osteotomy*
 Grade 3
  2 Levels 10 (35.7)
  3 Levels 10 (35.7)
  4 Levels 1 (3.6)
 Grade 4
  3 Levels 5 (17.9)
  4 Levels 2 (7.1)
Posterior instrumentation
 3 Segments 15 (53.6)
 4 Segments 11 (39.3)
 5 Segments 2 (7.1)
LIV level
 C6 4 (14.3)
 C7 24 (85.7)

Values are presented as mean±standard deviation (range) or number (%).

* Based on Ames cervical osteotomy nomenclature.

Table 2.
Changes in radiologic parameters
Radiologic parameter Preoperative period Immediate postoperative period Last follow-up postoperatively p-value
Preoperatively vs. immediate postoperatively Immediate postoperatively vs. last follow-up
CL (°) -9.2 ± 9.6 -6.0 ± 10.4 -5.7 ± 9.4 0.025* 0.842
T1 slope (°) 19.5 ± 8.8 21.9 ± 7.7 24.2 ± 9.5 0.103 0.046*
CGH-C7 SVA (mm) 19.1 ± 21.3 22.7 ± 14.8 32.2 ± 22.6 0.326 0.046*

CL, C2–7 lordosis; CGH, center of gravity of the head; SVA, sagittal vertical axis.

* p<0.05, statistically significant differences.

p-value was calculated using the paired t-test.

Table 3.
Changes in clinical outcome parameters
Clinical outcome parameter Preoperatively Postoperatively p-value
C-JOA score 10.7 ± 0.4 15.8 ± 0.4 < 0.001*
SF-12 score 34.1 ± 3.6 44.0 ± 4.1 < 0.001*
NDI score 38.6 ± 6.6 15.9 ± 4.5 < 0.001*

C-JOA, Japanese Orthopaedic Association score system for cervical myelopathy; SF-12, 12-item Short Form health survey; NDI, Neck Disability Index.

* p<0.05, statistically significant differences.

p-value was calculated using the paired t-test.

REFERENCES

1. Wu JC, Chen YC, Huang WC. Ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament in cervical spine: prevalence, management, and prognosis. Neurospine 2018;15:33-41.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
2. An HS, Al-Shihabi L, Kurd M. Surgical treatment for ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament in the cervical spine. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2014;22:420-9.
crossref pmid
3. Le HV, Wick JB, Van BW, et al. Ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2022;30:820-30.
crossref pmid
4. Ijima Y, Furuya T, Ota M, et al. The K-line in the cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament is different on plain radiographs and CT images. J Spine Surg 2018;4:403-7.
crossref pmid pmc
5. Kuo CH, Kuo YH, Chang CC, et al. Combined anterior and posterior decompression with fusion for cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament. Front Surg 2022;8:730133.
crossref pmid pmc
6. Ames CP, Smith JS, Scheer JK, et al. A standardized nomenclature for cervical spine soft-tissue release and osteotomy for deformity correction. J Neurosurg Spine 2013;19:269-78.
crossref pmid
7. Chung CY, Wong KH, Chiu MY, et al. A study of the clinical outcome of laminoplasty for cervical compressive myelopathy. J Orthop Trauma Rehabil 2012;16:70-4.
crossref pdf
8. Sayana MK, Jamil H, Poynton A. Cervical laminoplasty for multilevel cervical myelopathy. Adv Orthop 2011;2011:241729.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
9. Yang YM, Yoo WK, Bashir S, et al. Spinal cord changes after laminoplasty in cervical compressive myelopathy: a diffusion tensor imaging study. Front Neurol 2018;9:696.
crossref pmid pmc
10. Dugoni D, Mancarella C, Landi A, et al. Post laminoplasty cervical kyphosis—case report. Int J Surg Case Rep 2014;5:853-7.
crossref pmid pmc
11. Yoon S, Park JY, Kuh SU, et al. Risk factors for cervical sagittal malalignment after cervical laminoplasty. Nerve 2017;3:38-43.
crossref pdf
12. Cao J, Zhang J, Yang D, et al. Multivariate analysis of factors associated with kyphotic deformity after laminoplasty in cervical spondylotic myelopathy patients without preoperative kyphotic alignment. Sci Rep 2017;7:43443.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
13. Woo JB, Son DW, Lee SH, et al. Risk factors of allogenous bone graft collapse in two-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 2019;62:450-7.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
14. Weber MH, Fortin M, Shen J, et al. Graft subsidence and revision rates following anterior cervical corpectomy. Clin Spine Surg 2017;30:E1239-45.
crossref pmid
15. Hyun SJ, Kim KJ, Jahng TA, et al. Relationship between T1 slope and cervical alignment following multilevel posterior cervical fusion surgery: impact of T1 slope minus cervical lordosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2016;41:E396-402.
pmid
16. Inoue T, Ando K, Kobayashi K, et al. Age-related changes in T1 and C7 slope and the correlation between them in more than 300 asymptomatic subjects. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2021;46:E474-81.
crossref pmid
17. Lamas V, Chapon R, Prost S, et al. Variation of cervical sagittal alignment parameters according to age and pelvic incidence in degenerative spinal deformity patients. Eur Spine J 2023;32:3624-33.
crossref pmid pdf
18. Xie R, Liu J, Wang M, et al. The effect of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion on cervical sagittal vertical axis and lordosis with minimum 2-year follow-up. World Neurosurg 2021;150:e727-34.
crossref pmid
19. Das A, Yung A, Onafowokan O, et al. So close yet so far: the impact of undercorrection of cervical sagittal alignment during adult cervical deformity surgery - An Incremental correction analysis. J Clin Neurosci 2024;130:110869.
crossref pmid
20. Ani F, Sissman E, Woo D, et al. Are insufficient corrections a major factor in distal junctional kyphosis? A simulated analysis of cervical deformity correction using in-construct measurements. J Neurosurg Spine 2024;40:622-9.
crossref pmid
21. Yoon SY, Moon HI, Lee SC, et al. Association between cervical lordotic curvature and cervical muscle cross‐sectional area in patients with loss of cervical lordosis. Clin Anat 2018;31:710-5.
crossref pmid pdf
  • gs_medical
  • TOOLS
    Share :
    Facebook Twitter Linked In Google+
    METRICS Graph View
    • 2 Web of Science
    • 0 Crossref
    •   Scopus
    • 2,096 View
    • 87 Download
    Journal Impact Factor 3.6
    SURGERY: Q1
    CLINICAL NEUROLOGY: Q1
    Asia Spine 2025
    Asia Spine 2025
    × Asia Spine 2025
    Related articles in NS

    Surgical Strategy for Cervical OPLL with Kyphosis: Balancing Anterior, Posterior, and Combined Approaches – A Commentary on “Long-term Outcomes of Multilevel Anterior Cervical Osteotomy and Posterior Instrumentation for OPLL-Induced Myelopathy With Cervical Kyphosis”2025 September;22(3)

    Long-term Outcomes of Posterior Multilevel Crack Osteotomy: Revisional Surgery for Scoliosis With a Fusion Mass2023 September;20(3)



    Editorial Office
    Department of Neurosurgery, CHA Bundang Medical Center,
    CHA University School of Medicine,
    59 Yatap-ro, Bundang-gu, Seongnam 13496, Korea
    Tel: +82-31-780-1924  Fax: +82-31-780-5269  E-mail: support@e-neurospine.org
    The Korean Spinal Neurosurgery Society
    #407, Dong-A Villate 2 Town, 350 Seocho-daero, Seocho-gu, Seoul 06631, Korea
    Tel: +82-2-585-5455  Fax: +82-2-2-523-6812  E-mail: ksns1987@neurospine.or.kr
    Business License No.: 209-82-62443

    Copyright © The Korean Spinal Neurosurgery Society.

    Developed in M2PI

    Zoom in Close layer