The introduction of robot-assisted surgery is one of the greatest breakthroughs to have taken place in surgery, and it certainly represents the most significant advancement in minimally invasive surgery this decade. Robots were first used in gynecology, general surgery, and urological surgery, but the robotic revolution is now also occurring in neurosurgery and orthopedic surgery, where robot-assisted surgery is expected to play a crucial role in reproducibly performing procedures requiring very fine manipulations.
Over the past 10 years, spine surgery has adopted robotic technology to develop a new surgical paradigm. However, robot-assisted spine surgery is still in its early stage, and it is sometimes considered as a high-cost surgical tool and as a profitable business model for private spine centers.
This issue of
Neurospine publishes the results of a cost-effectiveness study on robot-assisted spine surgery. Dr. Menger et al. [
1] reported that the application of robotic surgery could be a cost-effective emerging technology resulting in less revision surgery, decreased infection rates, a reduced length of hospital stay, and shortened operative time. Modeling at a major academic center resulted in an estimated $608,546 of savings in 1 academic year. The editors of
Neurospine have selected this article as a featured article because it adds more evidence to the ongoing debate about the value of robot-assisted spine surgery.
Although robot-assisted spine surgery has not achieved the highest level of evidence in medical practice, we believe that this is a matter of time, and not a matter of pursuing the wrong direction.
The emergence of an aging society changes the patient population and patterns of disease, as well as the healthcare system. As we have more aged patients, we also have more aged surgeons and healthcare providers. Therefore, the need for high-quality robot-assisted surgical procedures can be seen as a direct consequence of the increasing proportion of aged surgeons. Surgeons make the highest-quality surgical decisions based on lifelong experience and knowledge combined with high-performance robotics that compensate for age-induced reductions in physical competence.
With the goal of achieving the highest-quality robotic technologies for the spine, the editors of Neurospine present several technological requirements of which surgical robot engineers and companies should be aware.
The first requirement is high-resolution visualization and real-time navigation technology. Real-time intraoperative high-resolution imaging with navigation will be mandatory to perform safe and reproducible surgical procedures while avoiding excessive tissue damage. Three-dimensional augmented virtual reality imaging technology will be required for visual enhancement. High-speed software and computer systems to autocorrect motions or vibrations, such as movements of the patient or of the surgeon’s hand, provide greater safety and allow surgeons to operate more competently.
The second requirement is the application of machine learning and artificial intelligence (AI). Machine learning and AI could provide appropriate surgical options to surgeons who encounter challenging situations, such as surgical bleeding, neural injury, or pedicle breakage. A computer mentoring or information feedback system could be an ideal solution to fulfill this requirement.
With the development of cutting-edge technology in computer science and robotics, we as spine surgeons have the opportunity to provide even safer and higher-quality spine care to our patients. Furthermore, surgeons over 70 years old could be able to practice spine surgery with the same level of physical and cognitive performance as surgeons in their mid-40s.
REFERENCES
- 1. Menger RP, Savardekar AR, Farokhi F, Sin A. A cost-effectiveness analysis of the integration of robotic spine technology in spine surgery. Neurospine 2018 August 29 [Epub]. https://doi.org/10.14245/ns.1836082.041.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by

- Characterizing the complication profile of spinal robotic systems: A MAUDE analysis of device failures and associated complications by device manufacturer and brand name
Neal A. Patel, Nolan J. Brown, Clifford He, Saarang Patel, Zach Pennington, Julian Gendreau, Ronald Sahyouni, Martin H. Pham
Journal of Clinical Neuroscience.2025; 135: 111149. CrossRef - Mixed reality–guided vertebroplasty versus traditional fluoroscopy group in the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture: A randomized controlled trial
Yi Lian, Anwu Xuan, Yanchun Xie, Hailong Yu, Yongcun Wei, Zening Wang, Liangbi Xiang, Hongwen Gu
Spine Research.2025; 1(3): 147. CrossRef - The impact of robotic assistance for lumbar fusion surgery on 90-day surgical outcomes and 1-year revisions
Jeremy C. Heard, Yunsoo A. Lee, Nicholas D. D’Antonio, Rajkishen Narayanan, Mark J. Lambrechts, John Bodnar, Caroline Purtill, Joshua D. Pezzulo, Dominic Farronato, Pat Fitzgerald, Jose A. Canseco, Ian David Kaye, Alan S. Hilibrand, Alexander R. Vaccaro,
Journal of Craniovertebral Junction and Spine.2024; 15(1): 15. CrossRef - Comparison of robot versus fluoroscopy-assisted pedicle screw instrumentation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis surgery: A retrospective study
Canglong Hou, Huan Yang, Yu Chen, Yilin Yang, Beichen Zhang, Kai Chen, Ming Li, Mingyuan Yang, Kai Chen
Frontiers in Surgery.2023;[Epub] CrossRef - Role of Robotics and Spinal Navigation in Reducing Surgical Complications
Guna Pratheep, Chandhan Murugan, Shanmuganathan Rajasekaran, Ajoy Prasad Shetty, Rishi Mugesh Kanna
Indian Spine Journal.2023; 6(1): 37. CrossRef - Great Expectations with Augmented Reality in Spine Surgery: Hope or Hype?A commentary on the article ‘Operator independent reliability of direct augmented reality navigated pedicle screw placement and rod bending’ by Farshad et al.
Bhavuk Garg, Nishank Mehta
North American Spine Society Journal (NASSJ).2022; 10: 100117. CrossRef - Novel C‐arm‐based planning robotic spinal surgery in a cadaver model using quantitative accuracy assessment methodology
Sangman Park, Hyung Cheol Kim, Yeongha Jeong, Dongyun Kim, Seungjae Ryu, Seongpung Lee, Yongyeob Cha, Sungteac Hwang, Donggi Woo, Hongho Kim, Dong Ah Shin, Yoon Ha, Keung Nyun Kim, Do Heum Yoon, Seong Yi
The International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery.2022;[Epub] CrossRef - Novel C‐arm based planning spine surgery robot proved in a porcine model and quantitative accuracy assessment methodology
Hyung Cheol Kim, Hyeongseok Jeon, Seong Bae An, Hongho Kim, Sungteac Hwang, Yongyeob Cha, Seohyun Moon, Dong Ah Shin, Yoon Ha, Keung Nyun Kim, Do Heum Yoon, Seong Yi
The International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery.2021;[Epub] CrossRef - Spine surgical robotics: review of the current application and disadvantages for future perspectives
Junshen Huang, Yuxi Li, Lin Huang
Journal of Robotic Surgery.2020; 14(1): 11. CrossRef - Robotic spine surgery: Ushering in a new era
Bhavuk Garg, Nishank Mehta, Rajesh Malhotra
Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma.2020; 11(5): 753. CrossRef - Robotic Spine Surgery: Current State in Minimally Invasive Surgery
Chau D. Vo, Bowen Jiang, Tej D. Azad, Neil R. Crawford, Ali Bydon, Nicholas Theodore
Global Spine Journal.2020; 10(2_suppl): 34S. CrossRef - Navigation and Robotics in Pediatric Spine Surgery
Daniel Hedequist, A. Noelle Larson, Mark Erickson
Journal of the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America.2020; 2(1): 81. CrossRef