1. Lenke LG. Lenke classification system of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: treatment recommendations. Instr Course Lect 2005;54:537-42.
2. Barsi J, Caprio B, Garg S, et al. Do Intraoperative LIV-tilt and disk angle remain stable at 2-year follow-up compared with upright radiographs in patients with idiopathic scoliosis?: a retrospective cohort study. J Spinal Disord Tech 2015;28:264-9.
3. O’Donnell C, Michael N, Pan X, et al. Anterior spinal fusion and posterior spinal fusion both effectively treat Lenke type 5 curves in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a multicenter study. Spine Deform 2018;6:231-40.
4. Zhuang Q, Zhang J, Wang S, et al. How to select the lowest instrumented vertebra in Lenke type 5 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients? Spine J 2021;21:141-9.
10. Auerbach JD, Lonner BS, Errico TJ, et al. Quantification of intradiscal pressures below thoracolumbar spinal fusion constructs: is there evidence to support “saving a level”? Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2012;37:359-66.
12. Chang DG, Yang JH, Suk SI, et al. Importance of distal fusion level in major thoracolumbar and lumbar adolescent idiopathic scoliosis treated by rod derotation and direct vertebral rotation following pedicle screw instrumentation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2017;42:E890-8.
14. Malfair D, Flemming AK, Dvorak MF, et al. Radiographic evaluation of scoliosis: review. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2010;194(3 Suppl):S8-22.
15. King HA, Moe JH, Bradford DS, et al. The selection of fusion levels in thoracic idiopathic scoliosis. JBJS 1983;65:1302-13.
17. Ogura Y, Okada E, Fujii T, et al. Midterm surgical outcomes of a short fusion strategy for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis with Lenke 5C curve. Spine J 2020;20:361-8.
19. Wang Y, Bünger CE, Zhang Y, et al. Lowest instrumented vertebra selection for Lenke 5C scoliosis: a minimum 2-year radiographical follow-up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2013;38:E894-900.
21. Banno T, Yamato Y, Oba H, et al. Should L3 be selected as the lowest instrumented vertebra in patients with Lenke type 5C adolescent idiopathic scoliosis whose lowest end vertebra is L4? J Neurosurg Spine 2021;35:330-9.
23. Chang DG, Suk SI, Song KS, et al. How to avoid distal adding-on phenomenon for rigid curves in major thoracolumbar and lumbar adolescent idiopathic scoliosis? Identifying the incidence of distal adding-on by selection of lowest instrumented vertebra. World Neurosurgery 2019;132:e472-8.
24. Wang Y, Hansen ES, Høy K, et al. Distal adding-on phenomenon in Lenke 1A scoliosis: risk factor identification and treatment strategy comparison. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2011;36:1113-22.
25. Li Y, Bai H, Liu C, et al. Distal adding-on phenomenon in Lenke IA and Lenke IIA: risk analysis and selection of the lowest instrumented vertebra. World Neurosurg 2020;136:e171-80.
26. Cho RH, Yaszay B, Bartley CE, et al. Which Lenke 1A curves are at the greatest risk for adding-on... and why? Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2012;37:1384-90.
28. Yang J, Andras LM, Broom AM, et al. Preventing distal junctional kyphosis by applying the stable sagittal vertebra concept to selective thoracic fusion in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine Deform 2018;6:38-42.
29. Enercan M, Kahraman S, Yilar S, et al. Does it make a difference to stop fusion at L3 versus L4 in terms of disc and facet joint degeneration: an MRI study with minimum 5 years follow-up. Spine Deform 2016;4:237-44.
30. Koller H, Enercan M, Decker S, et al. Resolution of the lumbosacral fractional curve and evaluation of the risk for adding on in 101 patients with posterior correction of Lenke 3, 4, and 6 curves. J Neurosurg Spine 2021;35:471-85.
31. Lee CS, Ha JK, Kim DG, et al. The clinical importance of sacral slanting in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis undergoing surgery. Spine J 2015;15:834-40.